Literature DB >> 18008363

Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review.

Jean G Ford1, Mollie W Howerton, Gabriel Y Lai, Tiffany L Gary, Shari Bolen, M Chris Gibbons, Jon Tilburt, Charles Baffi, Teerath Peter Tanpitukpongse, Renee F Wilson, Neil R Powe, Eric B Bass.   

Abstract

Racial and ethnic minorities, older adults, rural residents, and individuals of low socioeconomic status are underrepresented among participants in cancer-related trials. The authors conducted a systematic review to determine the barriers to participation of underrepresented populations in cancer-related trials. Their search included English-language publications that reported original data on the recruitment of underrepresented groups to cancer treatment or prevention trials between 1966 and December 2005 in multiple electronic databases. They also hand-searched titles in 34 journals from January 2003 to December 2005 and they examined reference lists for eligible articles. Titles and abstracts were reviewed to identify relevant studies. Data on barriers to participation were synthesized both qualitatively and based on statistically significant associations with trial enrollment. Of 5257 studies that were cited, 65 studies were eligible for inclusion in the current analysis, including 46 studies on recruitment into cancer therapeutic trials, 15 studies on recruitment into prevention trials, and 4 studies on recruitment into both prevention and treatment trials. Numerous factors were reported as barriers to participation in cancer-related trials. However, only 20 of the studies reported statistically significant associations between hypothesized barriers and enrollment. The available evidence had limitations in quality regarding representativeness, justification of study methods, the reliability and validity of data-collection methods, potential for bias, and data analysis. The results indicated that underrepresented populations face numerous barriers to participation in cancer-related trials. The current systematic review highlighting the literature on recruitment of underrepresented populations to cancer trials and may be used as the evidence base toward developing an agenda for etiologic and intervention research to reduce the disparities in participation in cancer-related trials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18008363     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  413 in total

1.  Training Needs of Clinical and Research Professionals to Optimize Minority Recruitment and Retention in Cancer Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Soumya J Niranjan; Raegan W Durant; Jennifer A Wenzel; Elise D Cook; Mona N Fouad; Selwyn M Vickers; Badrinath R Konety; Sarah B Rutland; Zachary R Simoni; Michelle Y Martin
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Socioeconomic and clinical factors are key to uncovering disparity in accrual onto therapeutic trials for breast cancer.

Authors:  Carolyn E Behrendt; Arti Hurria; Lusine Tumyan; Joyce C Niland; Joanne E Mortimer
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 11.908

3.  The in vivo adherence intervention for at risk adolescents with asthma: report of a randomized pilot trial.

Authors:  Michael Seid; Elizabeth J D'Amico; James W Varni; Jennifer K Munafo; Maria T Britto; Carolyn M Kercsmar; Dennis Drotar; Eileen C King; Lynn Darbie
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2011-12-13

4.  "The promise of community-based advocacy and education efforts for increasing cancer clinical trials accrual".

Authors:  Margo Michaels; Elisa S Weiss; John A Guidry; Natasha Blakeney; Liz Swords; Brian Gibbs; Samantha Yeun; Bruce Rytkonen; Robert Goodman; S Lisbeth Jarama; Amanda L Greene; Shilpa Patel
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Can claims-based data be used to recruit black and Hispanic subjects into clinical trials?

Authors:  Ana M Palacio; Leonardo J Tamariz; Claudia Uribe; Hua Li; Ellen J Salkeld; Leslie Hazel-Fernandez; Olveen Carrasquillo
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Racial/ethnic differences in clinical trial enrollment, refusal rates, ineligibility, and reasons for decline among patients at sites in the National Cancer Institute's Community Cancer Centers Program.

Authors:  Aisha T Langford; Ken Resnicow; Eileen P Dimond; Andrea M Denicoff; Diane St Germain; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Rebecca A Enos; Angela Carrigan; Kathy Wilkinson; Ronald S Go
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Barriers to therapeutic clinical trials enrollment: differences between African-American and white cancer patients identified at the time of eligibility assessment.

Authors:  Lynne Penberthy; Richard Brown; Maureen Wilson-Genderson; Bassam Dahman; Gordon Ginder; Laura A Siminoff
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.486

8.  Patient and family member perspectives on searching for cancer clinical trials: A qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Jennifer L Ridgeway; Gladys B Asiedu; Katherine Carroll; Meaghan Tenney; Aminah Jatoi; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-08-22

9.  Clinical trial participation among ethnic/racial minority and majority patients with advanced cancer: what factors most influence enrollment?

Authors:  Rachel Jimenez; Baohui Zhang; Steven Joffe; Matthew Nilsson; Lorna Rivera; Jan Mutchler; Christopher Lathan; M Elizabeth Paulk; Holly G Prigerson
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 2.947

Review 10.  Lung cancer care: the impact of facilities and area measures.

Authors:  Christopher S Lathan
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.