Literature DB >> 17218166

Costs of recruiting couples to a clinical trial.

Georgia Robins Sadler1, Celine M Ko, Vanessa L Malcarne, Rajni Banthia, Ivan Gutierrez, James W Varni.   

Abstract

Multiple barriers contribute to the slow recruitment of participants to research studies, which in turn extends the time required to translate promising scientific discoveries into proven therapeutic interventions. A small but growing literature is developing on the extraordinary costs of recruiting participants to studies, and thereby demonstrating that underestimating the cost of participant recruitment can contribute to these recruitment problems. These recruitment challenges and costs are exacerbated when the participants' study eligibility is determined by relatively narrowly defined illness parameters. Recruitment challenges are further compounded when dyads (two individuals engaged in a sociologically significant relationship, such as husbands and wives, siblings or extended families) must be recruited to an illness-focused study. For these latter groups, there are no data to guide researchers in how to anticipate those participant recruitment costs. This paper describes the staff costs for a variety of strategies used to recruit participants to a randomized supportive care study for couples who were within 18 months of a prostate cancer diagnosis. Pegged to the value of the U.S. dollar for the period, the average cost of staff time was $288 per recruited and enrolled dyad, plus a promised additional $100 incentive for study retention. Within the strategies used, the staff costs per recruited dyad ranged from $152 to $1688. Accrual per strategy ranged from 0 to 107 enrolled couples. When asked for secondary sources of information about the study, many participants reported more than one source of study referral, reflective of the multifaceted recruitment strategies deployed. In spite of innovative, culturally competent, and broad based recruitment methods, attainment of a diverse sample was difficult to accomplish in this study. Having estimates of the actual cost of recruiting dyads to research studies can help investigators prepare realistic study budgets.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17218166      PMCID: PMC2819400          DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials        ISSN: 1551-7144            Impact factor:   2.226


  39 in total

1.  Therapeutic trial participants: where do we find them and what does it cost?

Authors:  R J Bielski; R B Lydiard
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  1997

2.  Monitoring recruitment effectiveness and cost in a clinical trial.

Authors:  W M Bjornson-Benson; T B Stibolt; K A Manske; K J Zavela; D J Youtsey; A S Buist
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1993-04

3.  Exclusion of elderly people from clinical research: a descriptive study of published reports.

Authors:  G Bugeja; A Kumar; A K Banerjee
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-10-25

4.  Including elderly people in clinical trials.

Authors:  J Avorn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-10-25

5.  Recruiting older adults for clinical trials.

Authors:  J Adams; M Silverman; D Musa; P Peele
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1997-02

Review 6.  Recruiting minorities into clinical trials: toward a participant-friendly system.

Authors:  G M Swanson; A J Ward
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1995-12-06       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Comparison of recruitment strategies for a large-scale clinical trial in the elderly.

Authors:  C A Silagy; K Campion; J J McNeil; B Worsam; G A Donnan; A M Tonkin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 8.  Cancer clinical trials in the community setting: a 20 year retrospective.

Authors:  R A Avent; R O Dillman
Journal:  Cancer Biother       Date:  1995

Review 9.  Current issues in oncology reimbursement.

Authors:  J S Bailes
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.990

10.  Representation of African-Americans, Hispanics, and whites in National Cancer Institute cancer treatment trials.

Authors:  H A Tejeda; S B Green; E L Trimble; L Ford; J L High; R S Ungerleider; M A Friedman; O W Brawley
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1996-06-19       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  13 in total

1.  Understanding recruitment and retention in neurological research.

Authors:  Alyssa Newberry; Paula Sherwood; Allison Hricik; Sarah Bradley; Jean Kuo; Elizabeth Crago; Leslie A Hoffman; Barbara A Given
Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.230

2.  A dance intervention for cancer survivors and their partners (RHYTHM).

Authors:  Maria Pisu; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Kelly M Kenzik; Robert A Oster; Chee Paul Lin; Sharon Manne; Ronald Alvarez; Michelle Y Martin
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 4.442

3.  Increasing Asian American women's research participation: the Asian grocery store-based cancer education program.

Authors:  Georgia Robins Sadler; Celine M Ko; Mitsuko Takahashi; Christy R Ching; Irene Lee; Gin C Chuang; Kathy K Lee
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 2.226

4.  Developing partnerships and recruiting dyads for a prostate cancer informed decision making program: lessons learned from a community-academic-clinical team.

Authors:  Daniela B Friedman; Kim M Johnson; Otis L Owens; Tracey L Thomas; Delisa S Dawkins; Lucy Gansauer; Sharon Bartelt; Nancy M Waddell; Pastor J Talley; James D Bearden; James R Hébert
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Mother-Daughter Dyad Recruitment and Cancer Intervention Challenges in an African American Sample.

Authors:  Maghboeba Mosavel; Katie Ports; Ellyn Leighton-Herrmann
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2014-06-01

6.  Effort required in eligibility screening for clinical trials.

Authors:  Lynne T Penberthy; Bassam A Dahman; Valentina I Petkov; Jonathan P DeShazo
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Web-based recruiting for health research using a social networking site: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Yeshe Fenner; Suzanne M Garland; Elya E Moore; Yasmin Jayasinghe; Ashley Fletcher; Sepehr N Tabrizi; Bharathy Gunasekaran; John D Wark
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Social media and internet driven study recruitment: evaluating a new model for promoting collaborator engagement and participation.

Authors:  Chetan Khatri; Stephen J Chapman; James Glasbey; Michael Kelly; Dmitri Nepogodiev; Aneel Bhangu; J Edward Fitzgerald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Effectiveness and cost of recruiting healthy volunteers for clinical research studies using an electronic patient portal: A randomized study.

Authors:  Mary H Samuels; Robert Schuff; Peter Beninato; Adriel Gorsuch; James Dursch; Sarah Egan; Bridget Adams; Kate F Hollis; Rachel Navarro; Timothy E Burdick
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2017-12

10.  Examining the challenges of family recruitment to behavioral intervention trials: factors associated with participation and enrollment in a multi-state colonoscopy intervention trial.

Authors:  Rebecca G Simmons; Yuan-Chin Amy Lee; Antoinette M Stroup; Sandra L Edwards; Amy Rogers; Christopher Johnson; Charles L Wiggins; Deirdre A Hill; Rosemary D Cress; Jan Lowery; Scott T Walters; Kory Jasperson; John C Higginbotham; Marc S Williams; Randall W Burt; Marc D Schwartz; Anita Y Kinney
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-04-30       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.