Literature DB >> 17682824

Participation in surgical oncology clinical trials: gender-, race/ethnicity-, and age-based disparities.

John H Stewart1, Alain G Bertoni, Jennifer L Staten, Edward A Levine, Cary P Gross.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the representation of racial/ethnic minorities, women, and older persons among participants in surgical trials sponsored by the National Cancer Institute (NCI).
METHODS: The NCI Clinical Trial Cooperative Group surgical oncology trials database was queried for breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers treated during the period 2000-2002 (n=13,991). Data from the SEER program and the Census were used to estimate age-, gender-, and race/ethnicity-specific incidence of the same cancers among U.S. adults during the same period. Enrollment fraction (EF), defined as the number of trial enrollees divided by the estimated U.S. cancer cases in each demographic group, was the primary outcome measure. Logistic regression was used to compare the enrollment of racial/ethnic, gender and age subgroups in this analysis.
RESULTS: Relative to white patients (EF=0.72%), lower EFs were noted in African-American (0.48%, odds ratio [OR] vs whites 0.67, P<0.001), Hispanic (0.54%, OR 0.76, P<0.001), and Asian/Pacific islander (0.59%, OR 0.82, P=0.001) patients. Overall, women were more likely to enroll in surgical trials (1.12%) than men (0.22%, OR 5.06, P<0.001). Patients 65-74 years of age (EF 0.45%) were less likely to be enrolled than those 20-44 years of age (EF=2.28%, OR 0.20, P=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The enrollment in surgical oncology trials is very low across all demographics. However, racial/ethnic minorities and older persons are less likely to be enrolled in cooperative group surgical oncology trials than are whites and younger patients. The high EF for women is due to the high availability of trials for women with breast cancer. Strategies to increase accrual to surgical trials and ameliorate disparities related to race/ethnicity, gender, and age are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17682824     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-007-9500-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  94 in total

1.  Socioeconomic and clinical factors are key to uncovering disparity in accrual onto therapeutic trials for breast cancer.

Authors:  Carolyn E Behrendt; Arti Hurria; Lusine Tumyan; Joyce C Niland; Joanne E Mortimer
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 11.908

2.  Community health workers' support for cancer clinical trials: description and explanation.

Authors:  Russell K Schutt; Lidia Schapira; Jennifer Maniates; Jessica Santiccioli; Silas Henlon; Judyann Bigby
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2010-08

3.  Characterization of clinical study populations by race and ethnicity in biomedical literature.

Authors:  Priyanka Kanakamedala; Susanne B Haga
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.847

4.  Participation of older patients with prostate cancer in Medicare eligible trials.

Authors:  Benjamin M Craig; Scott M Gilbert; Jill Boylston Herndon; Bruce Vogel; Gwendolyn P Quinn
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Opportunities for the cost reduction of medical care.

Authors:  Monte Malach; W J Baumol
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2009-08

6.  EDICT policy recommendations support protection of research participants.

Authors:  Wanda K Jones
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.037

7.  Insurance Clearance for Early-Phase Oncology Clinical Trials Following the Affordable Care Act.

Authors:  Kenneth L Kehl; Cheryl P Fullmer; Siqing Fu; Goldy C George; Kenneth R Hess; Filip Janku; Daniel D Karp; Shumei Kato; Cynthia K Kizer; Razelle Kurzrock; Aung Naing; Shubham Pant; Sarina A Piha-Paul; Vivek Subbiah; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; David S Hong
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Barriers to therapeutic clinical trials enrollment: differences between African-American and white cancer patients identified at the time of eligibility assessment.

Authors:  Lynne Penberthy; Richard Brown; Maureen Wilson-Genderson; Bassam Dahman; Gordon Ginder; Laura A Siminoff
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 2.486

Review 9.  Project PLACE: Enhancing community and academic partnerships to describe and address health disparities.

Authors:  Nadine J Barrett; Kearston L Ingraham; Kenisha Bethea; Pao Hwa-Lin; Maritza Chirinos; Laura J Fish; Schenita Randolph; Ping Zhang; Peter Le; Demetrius Harvey; Ronald L Godbee; Steven R Patierno
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 6.242

10.  Impact of primary care provider knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about cancer clinical trials: implications for referral, education and advocacy.

Authors:  Margo Michaels; Thomas A D'Agostino; Natasha Blakeney; Elisa S Weiss; Maria C Binz-Scharf; Mitch Golant; Carma L Bylund
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.037

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.