Literature DB >> 28269912

Automatic data source identification for clinical trial eligibility criteria resolution.

Chaitanya Shivade1, Courtney Hebert2, Kelly Regan2, Eric Fosler-Lussier1, Albert M Lai3.   

Abstract

Clinical trial coordinators refer to both structured and unstructured sources of data when evaluating a subject for eligibility. While some eligibility criteria can be resolved using structured data, some require manual review of clinical notes. An important step in automating the trial screening process is to be able to identify the right data source for resolving each criterion. In this work, we discuss the creation of an eligibility criteria dataset for clinical trials for patients with two disparate diseases, annotated with the preferred data source for each criterion (i.e., structured or unstructured) by annotators with medical training. The dataset includes 50 heart-failure trials with a total of 766 eligibility criteria and 50 trials for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with 677 criteria. Further, we developed machine learning models to predict the preferred data source: kernel methods outperform simpler learning models when used with a combination of lexical, syntactic, semantic, and surface features. Evaluation of these models indicates that the performance is consistent across data from both diagnoses, indicating generalizability of our method. Our findings are an important step towards ongoing efforts for automation of clinical trial screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28269912      PMCID: PMC5333255     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc        ISSN: 1559-4076


  21 in total

1.  Effective mapping of biomedical text to the UMLS Metathesaurus: the MetaMap program.

Authors:  A R Aronson
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2001

2.  An ontology of randomized controlled trials for evidence-based practice: content specification and evaluation using the competency decomposition method.

Authors:  Ida Sim; Ben Olasov; Simona Carini
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  Perspectives for medical informatics. Reusing the electronic medical record for clinical research.

Authors:  H U Prokosch; T Ganslandt
Journal:  Methods Inf Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.176

4.  Comparing ICD9-encoded diagnoses and NLP-processed discharge summaries for clinical trials pre-screening: a case study.

Authors:  Li Li; Herbert S Chase; Chintan O Patel; Carol Friedman; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2008-11-06

5.  Analysis of eligibility criteria representation in industry-standard clinical trial protocols.

Authors:  Sanmitra Bhattacharya; Michael N Cantor
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  Textual inference for eligibility criteria resolution in clinical trials.

Authors:  Chaitanya Shivade; Courtney Hebert; Marcelo Lopetegui; Marie-Catherine de Marneffe; Eric Fosler-Lussier; Albert M Lai
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 6.317

7.  Effort required in eligibility screening for clinical trials.

Authors:  Lynne T Penberthy; Bassam A Dahman; Valentina I Petkov; Jonathan P DeShazo
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.840

8.  Analysis of eligibility criteria complexity in clinical trials.

Authors:  Jessica Ross; Samson Tu; Simona Carini; Ida Sim
Journal:  Summit Transl Bioinform       Date:  2010-03-01

9.  Evaluation of data completeness in the electronic health record for the purpose of patient recruitment into clinical trials: a retrospective analysis of element presence.

Authors:  Felix Köpcke; Benjamin Trinczek; Raphael W Majeed; Björn Schreiweis; Joachim Wenk; Thomas Leusch; Thomas Ganslandt; Christian Ohmann; Björn Bergh; Rainer Röhrig; Martin Dugas; Hans-Ulrich Prokosch
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Automated clinical trial eligibility prescreening: increasing the efficiency of patient identification for clinical trials in the emergency department.

Authors:  Yizhao Ni; Stephanie Kennebeck; Judith W Dexheimer; Constance M McAneney; Huaxiu Tang; Todd Lingren; Qi Li; Haijun Zhai; Imre Solti
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Use of Natural Language Processing to Extract Clinical Cancer Phenotypes from Electronic Medical Records.

Authors:  Guergana K Savova; Ioana Danciu; Folami Alamudun; Timothy Miller; Chen Lin; Danielle S Bitterman; Georgia Tourassi; Jeremy L Warner
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Automated NLP Extraction of Clinical Rationale for Treatment Discontinuation in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Matthew S Alkaitis; Monica N Agrawal; Gregory J Riely; Pedram Razavi; David Sontag
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2021-05

Review 3.  Digital tools for the recruitment and retention of participants in randomised controlled trials: a systematic map.

Authors:  Geoff K Frampton; Jonathan Shepherd; Karen Pickett; Gareth Griffiths; Jeremy C Wyatt
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.279

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.