Literature DB >> 23594620

The response of retinal neurons to high-frequency stimulation.

Changsi Cai1, Perry Twyford, Shelley Fried.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: High-rate pulse trains have proven to be effective in cochlear prosthetics and, more recently, have been shown to elicit a wide range of interesting response properties in axons of the peripheral nervous system. Surprisingly, the effectiveness of such trains for use in retinal prostheses has not been explored. APPROACH: Using cell-attached patch clamp methods, we measured the in vitro response of two rabbit retinal ganglion cell types, OFF-brisk transient (OFF-BT) and ON-OFF directionally selective (DS), to trains of biphasic pulses delivered at 2000 pulses per second (PPS). MAIN
RESULTS: For OFF-BT cells, response onset occurred at ~20 µA, and maximum response occurred at ~40 µA. Interestingly, spiking levels decreased for further increases in amplitude. In contrast, DS cells had a spiking onset at ~25 µA and maintained strong spiking as stimulus amplitude was increased, even at the highest levels tested. Thus, a low-amplitude stimulus train at 2000 PPS (~25 µA) will activate OFF-BT cells strongly, while simultaneously activating DS cells only weakly. In contrast, a high amplitude train (~75 µA) will activate DS cells strongly while suppressing responses in OFF-BT cells. SIGNIFICANCE: The response differences between cell types suggest some forms of preferential activation may be possible, and further testing is warranted. Further, the scope of the response differences found here suggests activation mechanisms that are more complex than those described in previous studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23594620      PMCID: PMC3712762          DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/10/3/036009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  58 in total

1.  Electrical multisite stimulation of the isolated chicken retina.

Authors:  A Stett; W Barth; S Weiss; H Haemmerle; E Zrenner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Use of the Argus II retinal prosthesis to improve visual guidance of fine hand movements.

Authors:  Michael P Barry; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Polarized distribution of ion channels within microdomains of the axon initial segment.

Authors:  Audra Van Wart; James S Trimmer; Gary Matthews
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 3.215

4.  A method for generating precise temporal patterns of retinal spiking using prosthetic stimulation.

Authors:  S I Fried; H A Hsueh; F S Werblin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The slow wave component of retinal activity in rd/rd mice recorded with a multi-electrode array.

Authors:  J H Ye; Y S Goo
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 2.833

6.  High-resolution electrical stimulation of primate retina for epiretinal implant design.

Authors:  Chris Sekirnjak; Pawel Hottowy; Alexander Sher; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Blind subjects implanted with the Argus II retinal prosthesis are able to improve performance in a spatial-motor task.

Authors:  A K Ahuja; J D Dorn; A Caspi; M J McMahon; G Dagnelie; L Dacruz; P Stanga; M S Humayun; R J Greenberg
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Multiple components of ganglion cell desensitization in response to prosthetic stimulation.

Authors:  Daniel K Freeman; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 5.379

9.  Activation of retinal ganglion cells in wild-type and rd1 mice through electrical stimulation of the retinal neural network.

Authors:  Ralph J Jensen; Joseph F Rizzo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words.

Authors:  Eberhart Zrenner; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Heval Benav; Dorothea Besch; Anna Bruckmann; Veit-Peter Gabel; Florian Gekeler; Udo Greppmaier; Alex Harscher; Steffen Kibbel; Johannes Koch; Akos Kusnyerik; Tobias Peters; Katarina Stingl; Helmut Sachs; Alfred Stett; Peter Szurman; Barbara Wilhelm; Robert Wilke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  16 in total

1.  Temporal properties of network-mediated responses to repetitive stimuli are dependent upon retinal ganglion cell type.

Authors:  Maesoon Im; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Enhanced Control of Cortical Pyramidal Neurons With Micromagnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Seung Woo Lee; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 3.802

3.  Methodology for Biomimetic Chemical Neuromodulation of Rat Retinas with the Neurotransmitter Glutamate In Vitro.

Authors:  Corey M Rountree; John B Troy; Laxman Saggere
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Implications of Neural Plasticity in Retinal Prosthesis.

Authors:  Daniel Caravaca-Rodriguez; Susana P Gaytan; Gregg J Suaning; Alejandro Barriga-Rivera
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.925

5.  Suppression of subthalamic nucleus activity by micromagnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Seung Woo Lee; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.802

6.  Electric stimulus duration alters network-mediated responses depending on retinal ganglion cell type.

Authors:  Maesoon Im; Paul Werginz; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 5.379

7.  Response of Mouse Visual Cortical Neurons to Electric Stimulation of the Retina.

Authors:  Sang Baek Ryu; Paul Werginz; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Retinal output changes qualitatively with every change in ambient illuminance.

Authors:  Alexandra Tikidji-Hamburyan; Katja Reinhard; Hartwig Seitter; Anahit Hovhannisyan; Christopher A Procyk; Annette E Allen; Martin Schenk; Robert J Lucas; Thomas A Münch
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Implantable microcoils for intracortical magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Seung Woo Lee; Florian Fallegger; Bernard D F Casse; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Closed-Loop Efficient Searching of Optimal Electrical Stimulation Parameters for Preferential Excitation of Retinal Ganglion Cells.

Authors:  Tianruo Guo; Chih Yu Yang; David Tsai; Madhuvanthi Muralidharan; Gregg J Suaning; John W Morley; Socrates Dokos; Nigel H Lovell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.