Literature DB >> 22661464

Use of the Argus II retinal prosthesis to improve visual guidance of fine hand movements.

Michael P Barry1, Gislin Dagnelie.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We studied the capabilities of the Argus II retinal prosthesis for guiding fine hand movement, and demonstrated and quantified guidance improvement when using the device over when not using the device for progressively less predictable trajectories.
METHODS: A total of 21 patients with retinitis pigmentosa (RP), remaining vision no more than bare light perception, and an implanted Argus II epiretinal prostheses used a touchscreen to trace white paths on black backgrounds. Sets of paths were divided into three categories: right-angle/single-turn, mixed-angle/single-turn, and mixed-angle/two-turn. Subjects trained on paths by using prosthetic vision and auditory feedback, and then were tested without auditory feedback, with and without prosthetic vision. Custom software recorded position and timing information for any contact that subjects made with the screen. The area between the correct path and the trace, and the elapsed time to trace a path were used to evaluate subject performance.
RESULTS: For right-angle/single-turn sets, average tracing error was reduced by 63% and tracing time increased by 156% when using the prosthesis, relative to residual vision. With mixed-angle/single-turn sets, error was reduced by 53% and time to complete tracing increased by 184%. Prosthesis use decreased error by 38% and increased tracing time by 252% for paths that incorporated two turns.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of an epiretinal visual prosthesis can allow RP patients with no more than bare light perception to guide fine hand movement visually. Further, prosthetic input tends to make subjects slower when performing tracing tasks, presumably reflecting greater effort. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01123928.)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22661464      PMCID: PMC3416020          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.12-9536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  13 in total

1.  Restoration of useful vision up to letter recognition capabilities using subretinal microphotodiodes.

Authors:  Heval Benav; Karl U Bartz-Schmidt; Dorothea Besch; Anna Bruckmann; Florian Gekeler; Udo Greppmaier; Alex Harscher; Steffen Kibbel; Akos Kusnyerik; Tobias Peters; Helmut Sachs; Alfred Stett; Katarina Stingl; Barbara Wilhelm; Robert Wilke; Walter Wrobel; Eberhart Zrenner
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2010

2.  Visual performance using a retinal prosthesis in three subjects with retinitis pigmentosa.

Authors:  Douglas Yanai; James D Weiland; Manjunatha Mahadevappa; Robert J Greenberg; Ione Fine; Mark S Humayun
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Mark S Humayun; James D Weiland; Gildo Y Fujii; Robert Greenberg; Richard Williamson; Jim Little; Brian Mech; Valerie Cimmarusti; Gretchen Van Boemel; Gislin Dagnelie; Eugene de Juan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Psychophysical evaluation for visual prosthesis.

Authors:  Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.590

Review 5.  [Subretinal visual implants].

Authors:  K Stingl; U Greppmaier; B Wilhelm; E Zrenner
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2010-12-14       Impact factor: 0.700

6.  Preliminary 6 month results from the Argus II epiretinal prosthesis feasibility study.

Authors:  Mark S Humayun; Jessy D Dorn; Ashish K Ahuja; Avi Caspi; Eugene Filley; Gislin Dagnelie; Joël Salzmann; Arturo Santos; Jacque Duncan; Lyndon daCruz; Saddek Mohand-Said; Dean Eliott; Matthew J McMahon; Robert J Greenberg
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2009

7.  Persistent behavioural blindness after early visual deprivation and active visual rehabilitation: a case report.

Authors:  S Carlson; L Hyvärinen; A Raninen
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 4.638

8.  Visual rehabilitation after long lasting early blindness.

Authors:  S Carlson; L Hyvärinen
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1983-08

9.  Visual perception elicited by electrical stimulation of retina in blind humans.

Authors:  M S Humayun; E de Juan; G Dagnelie; R J Greenberg; R H Propst; D H Phillips
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-01

10.  Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words.

Authors:  Eberhart Zrenner; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Heval Benav; Dorothea Besch; Anna Bruckmann; Veit-Peter Gabel; Florian Gekeler; Udo Greppmaier; Alex Harscher; Steffen Kibbel; Johannes Koch; Akos Kusnyerik; Tobias Peters; Katarina Stingl; Helmut Sachs; Alfred Stett; Peter Szurman; Barbara Wilhelm; Robert Wilke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

View more
  22 in total

Review 1.  Neurophysiology and neural engineering: a review.

Authors:  Arthur Prochazka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Spatially patterned electrical stimulation to enhance resolution of retinal prostheses.

Authors:  Lauren H Jepson; Paweł Hottowy; Keith Mathieson; Deborah E Gunning; Władysław Dąbrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Photochemical approaches to vision restoration.

Authors:  Russell N Van Gelder
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Retinal implants: emergence of a multidisciplinary field.

Authors:  Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.710

Review 5.  Retinal Prosthesis System for Advanced Retinitis Pigmentosa: A Health Technology Assessment.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2016-06-01

6.  The response of retinal neurons to high-frequency stimulation.

Authors:  Changsi Cai; Perry Twyford; Shelley Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 7.  The Evolution of Neuroprosthetic Interfaces.

Authors:  Dayo O Adewole; Mijail D Serruya; James P Harris; Justin C Burrell; Dmitriy Petrov; H Isaac Chen; John A Wolf; D Kacy Cullen
Journal:  Crit Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2016

Review 8.  [Visual prostheses].

Authors:  P Walter
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.059

9.  High-fidelity reproduction of spatiotemporal visual signals for retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Lauren H Jepson; Pawel Hottowy; Geoffrey A Weiner; Władysław Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 10.  The functional performance of the Argus II retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  H Christiaan Stronks; Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.