Literature DB >> 17148702

Hip resurfacing: a technology reborn.

Steven Cutts1, Paul B Carter.   

Abstract

In recent years there has been a resurgence of interest in the concept of hip resurfacing. Much of this interest has stemmed from the work of McMinn in the West Midlands. Hip resurfacing is now emerging as a viable alternative to conventional hip replacement. In this article, we discuss the conceptual advantages offered by hip resurfacing and review the early clinical results and the ongoing clinical concerns regarding this technology.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17148702      PMCID: PMC2653925          DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.2005.044594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Postgrad Med J        ISSN: 0032-5473            Impact factor:   2.401


  37 in total

1.  Mid-term migration of a cemented total hip replacement assessed by radiostereometric analysis.

Authors:  J Alfaro-Adrian; H S Gill; B E Marks; D W Murray
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Using Teflon in arthroplasty of the hip-joint.

Authors:  J Charnley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1966-06       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years.

Authors:  R B C Treacy; C W McBryde; P B Pynsent
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-02

4.  Stability of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty at two years. A radiostereophotogrammetric analysis study.

Authors:  R Itayem; A Arndt; L Nistor; D McMinn; A Lundberg
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-02

5.  Comparative study of total hip arthroplasty between younger and older patients.

Authors:  S Kobayashi; N S Eftekhar; K Terayama; R P Joshi
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Osteonecrosis in retrieved femoral heads after failed resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  C P Little; A L Ruiz; I J Harding; P McLardy-Smith; R Gundle; D W Murray; N A Athanasou
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-03

7.  Uncemented total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years of age or younger.

Authors:  P A Dowdy; C H Rorabeck; R B Bourne
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Accumulation in liver and spleen of metal particles generated at nonbearing surfaces in hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Robert M Urban; Michael J Tomlinson; Deborah J Hall; Joshua J Jacobs
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Does the placenta inhibit the passage of chromium and cobalt after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty?

Authors:  Wolfram Brodner; Josef Georg Grohs; Dagmar Bancher-Todesca; Ronald Dorotka; Vanee Meisinger; Florian Gottsauner-Wolf; Rainer Kotz
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 10.  Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: the concerns.

Authors:  S J MacDonald
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  3 in total

1.  Markers of thrombin generation during resurfacing and noncemented total hip arthroplasty: a pilot study.

Authors:  Edwin P Su; Nikos Chatzoudis; Vasileios Sioros; George Go; Nigel E Sharrock
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Bipolar hip arthroplasty for avascular necrosis of femoral head in young adults.

Authors:  Baldev Dudani; Ashok K Shyam; Pankush Arora; Arjun Veigus
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 3.  Balancing innovation and medical device regulation: the case of modern metal-on-metal hip replacements.

Authors:  Jason J Howard
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2016-08-09
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.