Literature DB >> 19326068

The minimally invasive anterolateral approach combined with hip onlay resurfacing.

Ludger Gerdesmeyer1, Hans Gollwitzer, Peter Diehl, Björn Buttgereit, Maximilian Rudert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive anterolateral approach in hip resurfacing with complete preservation of muscular integrity. INDICATIONS: Primary or secondary osteoarthritis of the hip. APPROACH: None. Onlay implant: Females>55 years with osteoporosis. Males>60 years with osteoporosis. Severe varus deformity (CCD [collodiaphyseal] angle<100 degrees). History of metal allergy. Clinically relevant renal insufficiency. Radiologic appearance of avascular necrosis stage 3 and 4 according to Ficat. Femoral head cysts>1 cm in diameter. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Supine position with possible overextension of the hip, longitudinal incision along the intermuscular septum and blunt intermuscular dissection between gluteus medius and tensor fasciae latae, partial resection of the anterior capsule and anterior dislocation of the hip with complete proximal release of the capsule. Dislocation of the femoral head and dorsal positioning, reaming of the acetabulum to implant the cementless acetabular component, exposition and reaming of the femoral head in extension/adduction and external rotation, implantation of the cemented onlay endoprosthesis. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Prophylaxis of thromboembolism and periarticular ossification. Rehabilitation with weight bearing as tolerated starting on the day of surgery, ergometer training from day 4 after surgery.
RESULTS: 31 patients with osteoarthritis underwent onlay resurfacing via a minimally invasive approach. The Harris Hip Score improved from 43.9 to 97.1 at 12 months after surgery. Adverse events such as fracture, dislocation, nerve or muscle lesions did not occur, and clinically significant thromboembolism or infection was not observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19326068     DOI: 10.1007/s00064-009-1606-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol        ISSN: 0934-6694            Impact factor:   1.154


  9 in total

1.  Surgical approaches to total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel Kelmanovich; Michael L Parks; Raj Sinha; William Macaulay
Journal:  J South Orthop Assoc       Date:  2003

2.  Minimally invasive hip resurfacing.

Authors:  C Allison
Journal:  Issues Emerg Health Technol       Date:  2005-03

Review 3.  [Perioperative pain therapy for knee endoprosthetics].

Authors:  K J Wagner; E F Kochs; V Krautheim; L Gerdesmeyer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  Hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Biomechanical, morphological, and histological analysis of early failures in hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  M M Morlock; N Bishop; W Rüther; G Delling; M Hahn
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.617

6.  [Resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip].

Authors:  M Rudert; L Gerdesmeyer; H Rechl; P Juhnke; R Gradinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  [Experiences with Wagner's hip joint cup endoprosthesis. Indication, results complications].

Authors:  H O Dustmann; G Godolias
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb

8.  Surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  H Wagner
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1978 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty. The results of one hundred consecutive arthroplasties after eight to ten years.

Authors:  D W Howie; D Campbell; M McGee; B L Cornish
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.284

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  [Approach to painful hip resurfacing].

Authors:  L Gerdesmeyer; H Gollwitzer; P Diehl; M Fuerst; M Schmitt-Sody
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.087

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.