Literature DB >> 18813892

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: risk factors for failure over 25 years.

Eric J Yue1, Miguel E Cabanela, Gavan P Duffy, Michael G Heckman, Mary I O'Connor.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Many early metal-on-polyethylene hip resurfacing arthroplasty designs were abandoned after reports of high short-term and midterm failure rates. To investigate factors associated with failure, we retrospectively reviewed our experience with early-design hip resurfacing implants in 75 patients during a 25-year period (median followup, 7.9 years; range, 0.1-25.2 years). Implant failure was defined as revision for any reason. One of 75 patients was lost to followup. The estimated rate of implant survival was 73% at 5 years, 34% at 10 years, 27% at 15 years, 12% at 20 years, and 8% at 25 years. Of the many clinical and radiographic factors considered, only age, implant type, and gender were associated with implant survival independent of other variables considered. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty showed poor overall long-term survival in this series. Particular attention should be paid to the identified risk factors as long-term followup data become available for modern designs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18813892      PMCID: PMC2650042          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0506-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  42 in total

1.  The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mauricio Silva; Kee Haeng Lee; Christian Heisel; Mylene A Dela Rosa; Thomas P Schmalzried
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Orientation of the femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip. A biomechanical and clinical analysis.

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; Jessica L Lee; Michel J Le Duff; Harlan C Amstutz; Edward Ebramzadeh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Risk factors affecting outcome of metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  Paul E Beaulé; Frederick J Dorey; Michel J Le Duff; Michel LeDuff; Thomas Gruen; Harlan C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Failure mechanisms of total hip resurfacing: implications for the present.

Authors:  Merrill A Ritter; Joseph D Lutgring; Michael E Berend; Jeffery L Pierson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation.

Authors:  W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Innovations in design and technology. The story of hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  H C Amstutz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Pat A Campbell; Michel J Le Duff
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Harlan C Amstutz; Paul E Beaulé; Frederick J Dorey; Michel J Le Duff; Pat A Campbell; Thomas A Gruen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Charnley low-friction arthroplasty: a worldwide retrospective review at 15 to 20 years.

Authors:  John Older
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis.

Authors:  J Daniel; P B Pynsent; D J W McMinn
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2004-03
View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review comparing standardized outcomes.

Authors:  Deborah A Marshall; Karen Pykerman; Jason Werle; Diane Lorenzetti; Tracy Wasylak; Tom Noseworthy; Donald A Dick; Greg O'Connor; Aish Sundaram; Sanne Heintzbergen; Cy Frank
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Painful prosthesis: approaching the patient with persistent pain following total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Prisco Piscitelli; Giovanni Iolascon; Massimo Innocenti; Roberto Civinini; Alessandro Rubinacci; Maurizio Muratore; Michele D'Arienzo; Paolo Tranquilli Leali; Anna Maria Carossino; Maria Luisa Brandi
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2013-05

Review 3.  The clinical and radiological outcomes of hip resurfacing versus total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Toby O Smith; Rachel Nichols; Simon T Donell; Caroline B Hing
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 3.717

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.