Literature DB >> 23538557

Passive and Active Approach Responses in Preference Assessment for Children With Profound Multiple Disabilities and Minimal Movement.

Sara Spevack1, Lisa Wright, C T Yu, Kerri L Walters, Stephen Holborn.   

Abstract

We assessed the activity preferences of three children with profound multiple disabilities and minimal movement using a single stimulus presentation procedure. We recorded active approach, passive approach, and rejection responses on each trial during the assessments. Active approach included reaching for, touching, or manipulating the stimulus. Passive approach included looking at or orienting toward the stimulus and happiness indicators such as smiling. Active approaches and rejection responses were infrequent, but preference hierarchies based on passive approaches emerged for all three children. Two children were available for reinforcer testing after the preference assessments. The identified high preference activities based on passive approach responses maintained higher rates of switch pressing than the low preference activities for one child and maintained approximately the same rates of switch pressing for the second child.

Entities:  

Keywords:  passive approach; preference assessment; profound multiple disabilities

Year:  2008        PMID: 23538557      PMCID: PMC3608576     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dev Disabl        ISSN: 1188-9136


  11 in total

1.  Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.

Authors:  L P Hagopian; K S Rush; A B Lewin; E S Long
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

2.  A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.

Authors:  W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; L P Hagopian; J C Owens; I Slevin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

Review 3.  Teaching persons with profound multiple handicaps: a review of the effects of behavioral research.

Authors:  D H Reid; J F Phillips; C W Green
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1991

Review 4.  Empirically based methods to assess the preferences of individuals with severe disabilities.

Authors:  S Lohrmann-O'Rourke; D M Browder
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  1998-09

5.  A preliminary procedure for predicting the positive and negative effects of reinforcement-based procedures.

Authors:  C C Piazza; W W Fisher; G P Hanley; K Hilker; K M Derby
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

6.  Defining, validating, and increasing indices of happiness among people with profound multiple disabilities.

Authors:  C W Green; D H Reid
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

7.  Identifying reinforcers for persons with profound handicaps: staff opinion versus systematic assessment of preferences.

Authors:  C W Green; D H Reid; L K White; R C Halford; D P Brittain; S M Gardner
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1988

8.  Teaching choice making during social interactions to students with profound multiple disabilities.

Authors:  C H Kennedy; T G Haring
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1993

9.  A replication to increase happiness indices among some people with profound multiple disabilities.

Authors:  M T Ivancic; G T Barrett; A Simonow; A Kimberly
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb

10.  SENSITIVITY OF PASSIVE APPROACH DURING PREFERENCE AND REINFORCER ASSESSMENTS FOR CHILDREN WITH SEVERE AND PROFOUND INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES AND MINIMAL MOVEMENT.

Authors:  Sara Spevack; C T Yu; May S Lee; Garry L Martin
Journal:  Behav Interv       Date:  2006-07
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.

Authors:  Jordan D Lill; Mark D Shriver; Keith D Allen
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2021-04-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.