Literature DB >> 8473259

Teaching choice making during social interactions to students with profound multiple disabilities.

C H Kennedy1, T G Haring.   

Abstract

We taught 4 students with profound multiple disabilities to use a microswitch communication system to request a change in recreational stimuli during social interactions with nondisabled peers. In Study 1, we conducted a preference assessment across a range of stimuli for each student. The most and least preferred stimuli were incorporated into microswitch communication system training in Study 2. During the second study, 3 of the 4 students (a) learned to use the microswitch communication system to control stimulus presentation, (b) more clearly differentiated their time among stimuli, and (c) increased their level of general alertness. Study 3 extended the use of the microswitch communication system to social interactions with nondisabled peers. Two students were more engaged in interactions when they chose when to change stimuli; 1 student was more alert when a peer chose when to change activities; a 4th student showed an undifferentiated pattern. The outcomes of the investigation are discussed in terms of the effects of controlling stimulus presentation on the behavior of students with profound multiple disabilities and the stability of preference hierarchies over time.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8473259      PMCID: PMC1297720          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1993.26-63

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  14 in total

1.  Effects of choice making on the serious problem behaviors of students with severe handicaps.

Authors:  K Dyer; G Dunlap; V Winterling
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1990

2.  Vibration as a reinforcer with a profoundly retarded child.

Authors:  J Bailey; L Meyerson
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1969

Review 3.  Teaching persons with profound multiple handicaps: a review of the effects of behavioral research.

Authors:  D H Reid; J F Phillips; C W Green
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1991

4.  Identifying reinforcers for persons with profound handicaps: staff opinion versus systematic assessment of preferences.

Authors:  C W Green; D H Reid; L K White; R C Halford; D P Brittain; S M Gardner
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1988

5.  Computerized assessment of preference for severely handicapped individuals.

Authors:  J Dattilo
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1986

6.  Training students with profound or multiple handicaps to make requests via microswitches.

Authors:  D P Wacker; B Wiggins; M Fowler; W K Berg
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1988

7.  The influence of task variation and maintenance tasks on the learning and affect of autistic children.

Authors:  G Dunlap
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1984-02

8.  Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.

Authors:  G M Pace; M T Ivancic; G L Edwards; B A Iwata; T J Page
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985

9.  Evaluation of reinforcer preferences for profoundly handicapped students.

Authors:  D P Wacker; W K Berg; B Wiggins; M Muldoon; J Cavanaugh
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985

10.  Motivating autistic children through stimulus variation.

Authors:  G Dunlap; R L Koegel
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1980
View more
  7 in total

1.  Examination of relative reinforcement effects of stimuli identified through pretreatment and daily brief preference assessments.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; W W Fisher; V Rodriguez-Catter; K Maglieri; K Herman; J M Marhefka
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

2.  A review of interventions to teach a mand repertoire.

Authors:  E Shafer
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  1995

3.  Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities.

Authors:  D C Lerman; B A Iwata; B Rainville; J D Adelinis; K Crosland; J Kogan
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

4.  Effects of subject- versus experimenter-selected reinforcers on the behavior of individuals with profound developmental disabilities.

Authors:  R G Smith; B A Iwata; B A Shore
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1995

5.  Passive and Active Approach Responses in Preference Assessment for Children With Profound Multiple Disabilities and Minimal Movement.

Authors:  Sara Spevack; Lisa Wright; C T Yu; Kerri L Walters; Stephen Holborn
Journal:  J Dev Disabl       Date:  2008

6.  Systematic assessment of food item preference and reinforcer effectiveness: Enhancements in training laboratory-housed rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Allison L Martin; Andrea N Franklin; Jaine E Perlman; Mollie A Bloomsmith
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  Comparing Single Case Design Overlap-Based Effect Size Metrics From Studies Examining Speech Generating Device Interventions.

Authors:  Mo Chen; Jolene K Hyppa-Martin; Joe E Reichle; Frank J Symons
Journal:  Am J Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2016-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.