Literature DB >> 11800186

Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.

L P Hagopian1, K S Rush, A B Lewin, E S Long.   

Abstract

Most preference assessments require individuals to choose among two or more stimuli. More recently, the duration of engagement with items has been used as an index of preference. In the current study, the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement (SSE) preference assessment was evaluated with 4 individuals. Stimuli were presented singly for a brief period while engagement with that stimulus was recorded. Although SSE preference rankings closely matched paired stimulus preference assessment rankings for only 2 of the 4 participants, relative preference rankings based on duration of engagement predicted relative reinforcer effectiveness for all participants in a subsequent concurrent-schedule reinforcer assessment. The SSE procedure took less time to administer than the paired stimulus procedure but produced less stable preference rankings across administrations. The SSE procedure may be appropriate for individuals who have difficulty selecting one stimulus from among two or more stimuli, and it may be well suited for evaluating activities that are difficult to present in a paired stimulus format.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11800186      PMCID: PMC1284341          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2001.34-475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  8 in total

1.  Examination of ambiguous stimulus preferences with duration-based measures.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata; J Conners; M D Wallace
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1999

2.  A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.

Authors:  W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; L P Hagopian; J C Owens; I Slevin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

3.  Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.

Authors:  H S Roane; T R Vollmer; J E Ringdahl; B A Marcus
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1998

4.  Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification.

Authors:  W W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; A Amari
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  1996-07

5.  Using a choice assessment to predict reinforcer effectiveness.

Authors:  C C Piazza; W W Fisher; L P Hagopian; L G Bowman; L Toole
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

6.  Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

7.  Displacement of leisure reinforcers by food during preference assessments.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata; E M Roscoe
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1997

8.  Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.

Authors:  G M Pace; M T Ivancic; G L Edwards; B A Iwata; T J Page
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985
  8 in total
  15 in total

1.  Evaluation of the rate of problem behavior maintained by different reinforcers across preference assessments.

Authors:  Soyeon Kang; Mark F O'Reilly; Christina L Fragale; Jeannie M Aguilar; Mandy Rispoli; Russell Lang
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2011

2.  Schedule thinning following communication training: using competing stimuli to enhance tolerance to decrements in reinforcer density.

Authors:  Louis P Hagopian; Stephanie A Contrucci Kuhn; Ethan S Long; Karena S Rush
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005

3.  The effects of brief and extended stimulus availability on preference.

Authors:  Jody Steinhilber; Cammarie Johnson
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007

4.  An Evaluation of Assistive Technology in Determining Job-Specific Preference for Adults With Autism and Intellectual Disabilities.

Authors:  Edith Walsh; Helena Lydon; Jennifer Holloway
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2019-08-05

5.  Progressing from identification and functional analysis of precursor behavior to treatment of self-injurious behavior.

Authors:  Joseph D Dracobly; Richard G Smith
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012

6.  Differential Reinforcement of Other Behaviour for the Reduction of Severe Nail Biting.

Authors:  Louise Heffernan; Danielle Lyons
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2016-01-26

7.  Sensitivity to Changing Environmental Conditions across Individuals with Subtype 2 Automatically Reinforced and Socially Reinforced Self-injury.

Authors:  Griffin W Rooker; Louis P Hagopian; Jennifer N Haddock; Nabil Mezhoudi; Alexander R Arevalo
Journal:  Behav Dev Bull       Date:  2019-10

8.  Effects of a Preferred Stimulus and Mother's Attention on Infant Behavior During Tummy Time.

Authors:  Rika Ortega; Daniel M Fienup
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2014-11-11

9.  Passive and Active Approach Responses in Preference Assessment for Children With Profound Multiple Disabilities and Minimal Movement.

Authors:  Sara Spevack; Lisa Wright; C T Yu; Kerri L Walters; Stephen Holborn
Journal:  J Dev Disabl       Date:  2008

10.  Modifying a behavior intervention plan according to classroom aides acceptability ratings: effects on treatment integrity and challenging behavior.

Authors:  Benjamin R Thomas; Michael Lafasakis
Journal:  Int J Dev Disabil       Date:  2019-06-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.