Literature DB >> 9779282

Empirically based methods to assess the preferences of individuals with severe disabilities.

S Lohrmann-O'Rourke1, D M Browder.   

Abstract

A literature review was conducted to provide a synthesis of 18 years of research on preference assessment with individuals who have severe disabilities (e.g., severe mental retardation, autism, multiple disabilities). Through this synthesis, several procedural variables were identified that may influence the outcome of preference assessment, including context, assessment stimuli, selection response, and format. Recommendations were given for designing preference assessment, and questions were raised for future research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9779282     DOI: 10.1352/0895-8017(1998)103<0146:EBMTAT>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ment Retard        ISSN: 0895-8017


  7 in total

1.  Examination of relative reinforcement effects of stimuli identified through pretreatment and daily brief preference assessments.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; W W Fisher; V Rodriguez-Catter; K Maglieri; K Herman; J M Marhefka
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

2.  Examination of the influence of contingency on changes in reinforcer value.

Authors:  Iser G DeLeon; Meagan K Gregory; Michelle A Frank-Crawford; Melissa J Allman; Arthur E Wilke; Abbey B Carreau-Webster; Mandy M Triggs
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2011

3.  Tangibles, Pictures, and Verbal Descriptions: Which Should Be Used in Choice Presentations?

Authors:  C T Yu; Garry L Martin
Journal:  J Dev Disabl       Date:  2003

4.  Response acquisition under direct and indirect contingencies of reinforcement.

Authors:  R H Thompson; B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

5.  Predicting the relative efficacy of verbal, pictorial, and tangible stimuli for assessing preferences of leisure activities.

Authors:  Cecile de Vries; C T Yu; Gina Sakko; Kirsten M Wirth; Kerri L Walters; Carole Marion; Garry L Martin
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  2005-03

6.  Innovation of a reinforcer preference assessment with the difficult to test.

Authors:  Muriel D Saunders; Richard R Saunders
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2011-03-15

7.  Passive and Active Approach Responses in Preference Assessment for Children With Profound Multiple Disabilities and Minimal Movement.

Authors:  Sara Spevack; Lisa Wright; C T Yu; Kerri L Walters; Stephen Holborn
Journal:  J Dev Disabl       Date:  2008
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.