Literature DB >> 23539237

SENSITIVITY OF PASSIVE APPROACH DURING PREFERENCE AND REINFORCER ASSESSMENTS FOR CHILDREN WITH SEVERE AND PROFOUND INTELLECTUAL DISABILITIES AND MINIMAL MOVEMENT.

Sara Spevack1, C T Yu, May S Lee, Garry L Martin.   

Abstract

We evaluated the use of passive approach to assess preferences of two children, with severe and profound intellectual disabilities. Both children had physical challenges and exhibited minimal physical movement. We also compared the relative reinforcing effects of the identified high and low preference stimuli for a switch pressing response, and for a more passive looking response. High and low preference stimuli were identified for both children. Moreover, the high preference stimulus maintained higher rates of responding than the low preference stimulus for both children for the passive looking response, but not for switch pressing. The study extended the use of passive approach to assess preferences and identified the choice of target response as a potential limiting factor during reinforcer tests for these children.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 23539237      PMCID: PMC3608574          DOI: 10.1002/bin.216

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Interv        ISSN: 1072-0847


  5 in total

1.  A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.

Authors:  W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; L P Hagopian; J C Owens; I Slevin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

Review 2.  Teaching persons with profound multiple handicaps: a review of the effects of behavioral research.

Authors:  D H Reid; J F Phillips; C W Green
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1991

3.  Defining, validating, and increasing indices of happiness among people with profound multiple disabilities.

Authors:  C W Green; D H Reid
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

4.  Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.

Authors:  G M Pace; M T Ivancic; G L Edwards; B A Iwata; T J Page
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985

5.  Current limits to reinforcer identification for some persons with profound multiple disabilities.

Authors:  M T Ivancic; J S Bailey
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb
  5 in total
  3 in total

1.  Innovation of a reinforcer preference assessment with the difficult to test.

Authors:  Muriel D Saunders; Richard R Saunders
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2011-03-15

2.  Passive and Active Approach Responses in Preference Assessment for Children With Profound Multiple Disabilities and Minimal Movement.

Authors:  Sara Spevack; Lisa Wright; C T Yu; Kerri L Walters; Stephen Holborn
Journal:  J Dev Disabl       Date:  2008

3.  Eye-tracking-based experimental paradigm to assess social-emotional abilities in young individuals with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities.

Authors:  Thalia Cavadini; Yannick Courbois; Edouard Gentaz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 3.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.