Literature DB >> 23536086

Adaptive temporal encoding leads to a background-insensitive cortical representation of speech.

Nai Ding1, Jonathan Z Simon.   

Abstract

Speech recognition is remarkably robust to the listening background, even when the energy of background sounds strongly overlaps with that of speech. How the brain transforms the corrupted acoustic signal into a reliable neural representation suitable for speech recognition, however, remains elusive. Here, we hypothesize that this transformation is performed at the level of auditory cortex through adaptive neural encoding, and we test the hypothesis by recording, using MEG, the neural responses of human subjects listening to a narrated story. Spectrally matched stationary noise, which has maximal acoustic overlap with the speech, is mixed in at various intensity levels. Despite the severe acoustic interference caused by this noise, it is here demonstrated that low-frequency auditory cortical activity is reliably synchronized to the slow temporal modulations of speech, even when the noise is twice as strong as the speech. Such a reliable neural representation is maintained by intensity contrast gain control and by adaptive processing of temporal modulations at different time scales, corresponding to the neural δ and θ bands. Critically, the precision of this neural synchronization predicts how well a listener can recognize speech in noise, indicating that the precision of the auditory cortical representation limits the performance of speech recognition in noise. Together, these results suggest that, in a complex listening environment, auditory cortex can selectively encode a speech stream in a background insensitive manner, and this stable neural representation of speech provides a plausible basis for background-invariant recognition of speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23536086      PMCID: PMC3643795          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5297-12.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  48 in total

1.  Sound processing hierarchy within human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Hidehiko Okamoto; Henning Stracke; Patrick Bermudez; Christo Pantev
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-06-03       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Specialized neuronal adaptation for preserving input sensitivity.

Authors:  Paul V Watkins; Dennis L Barbour
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-28       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 3.  Gain control mechanisms in the auditory pathway.

Authors:  Benjamin Louis Robinson; David McAlpine
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  Object-based auditory and visual attention.

Authors:  Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing.

Authors:  Søren Jørgensen; Torsten Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Speech recognition with primarily temporal cues.

Authors:  R V Shannon; F G Zeng; V Kamath; J Wygonski; M Ekelid
Journal:  Science       Date:  1995-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Speech coding in the auditory nerve: V. Vowels in background noise.

Authors:  B Delgutte; N Y Kiang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Neural timing is linked to speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Samira Anderson; Erika Skoe; Bharath Chandrasekaran; Nina Kraus
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Human evoked cortical activity to signal-to-noise ratio and absolute signal level.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Kelly L Tremblay; G Christopher Stecker; Wendy M Tolin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  The importance for speech intelligibility of random fluctuations in "steady" background noise.

Authors:  Michael A Stone; Christian Füllgrabe; Robert C Mackinnon; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  96 in total

1.  Theta and Gamma Bands Encode Acoustic Dynamics over Wide-Ranging Timescales.

Authors:  Xiangbin Teng; David Poeppel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Rapid Transformation from Auditory to Linguistic Representations of Continuous Speech.

Authors:  Christian Brodbeck; L Elliot Hong; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  Recent advances in exploring the neural underpinnings of auditory scene perception.

Authors:  Joel S Snyder; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Cortical Tracking of Speech-in-Noise Develops from Childhood to Adulthood.

Authors:  Marc Vander Ghinst; Mathieu Bourguignon; Maxime Niesen; Vincent Wens; Sergio Hassid; Georges Choufani; Veikko Jousmäki; Riitta Hari; Serge Goldman; Xavier De Tiège
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Rhythmic auditory cortex activity at multiple timescales shapes stimulus-response gain and background firing.

Authors:  Christoph Kayser; Caroline Wilson; Houman Safaai; Shuzo Sakata; Stefano Panzeri
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Evidence for enhanced neural tracking of the speech envelope underlying age-related speech-in-noise difficulties.

Authors:  Lien Decruy; Jonas Vanthornhout; Tom Francart
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  The encoding of auditory objects in auditory cortex: insights from magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 2.997

8.  Attentional Selection in a Cocktail Party Environment Can Be Decoded from Single-Trial EEG.

Authors:  James A O'Sullivan; Alan J Power; Nima Mesgarani; Siddharth Rajaram; John J Foxe; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham; Malcolm Slaney; Shihab A Shamma; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 9.  On the cyclic nature of perception in vision versus audition.

Authors:  Rufin VanRullen; Benedikt Zoefel; Barkin Ilhan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Semantic Context Enhances the Early Auditory Encoding of Natural Speech.

Authors:  Michael P Broderick; Andrew J Anderson; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.