Literature DB >> 19364526

Human evoked cortical activity to signal-to-noise ratio and absolute signal level.

Curtis J Billings1, Kelly L Tremblay, G Christopher Stecker, Wendy M Tolin.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of signal level and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on the latency and amplitude of evoked cortical activity to further our understanding of how the human central auditory system encodes signals in noise. Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) were recorded from 15 young normal-hearing adults in response to a 1000 Hz tone presented at two tone levels in quiet and while continuous background noise levels were varied in five equivalent SNR steps. These 12 conditions were used to determine the effects of signal level and SNR level on CAEP components P1, N1, P2, and N2. Based on prior signal-in-noise experiments conducted in animals, we hypothesized that SNR, would be a key contributor to human CAEP characteristics. As hypothesized, amplitude increased and latency decreased with increasing SNR; in addition, there was no main effect of tone level across the two signal levels tested (60 and 75 dB SPL). Morphology of the P1-N1-P2 complex was driven primarily by SNR, highlighting the importance of noise when recording CAEPs. Results are discussed in terms of the current interest in recording CAEPs in hearing aid users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19364526      PMCID: PMC2732364          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2009.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  45 in total

1.  Characterization of external ear impulse responses using Golay codes.

Authors:  B Zhou; D M Green; J C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Data reduction of multichannel fields: global field power and principal component analysis.

Authors:  W Skrandies
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1989 Fall-Winter       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Effects of continuous noise maskers on tone-evoked potentials in cat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  D P Phillips; J B Kelly
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Frontal auditory evoked potentials and augmenting-reducing.

Authors:  N Bruneau; S Roux; B Garreau; G Lelord
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1985-09

5.  Influence of stimulus intensity on AEP components in the 80- to 200-millisecond latency range.

Authors:  G Adler; J Adler
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1989

6.  Neural representation of sound amplitude in the auditory cortex: effects of noise masking.

Authors:  D P Phillips
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1990-03-26       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Plasticity of frequency organization in auditory cortex of guinea pigs with partial unilateral deafness.

Authors:  D Robertson; D R Irvine
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1989-04-15       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure.

Authors:  R Näätänen; T Picton
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Temporal response features of cat auditory cortex neurons contributing to sensitivity to tones delivered in the presence of continuous noise.

Authors:  D P Phillips
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 10.  Evoked potential assessment of auditory system integrity in infants.

Authors:  D R Stapells; D Kurtzberg
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 3.430

View more
  43 in total

1.  Cortical encoding of signals in noise: effects of stimulus type and recording paradigm.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Keri O Bennett; Michelle R Molis; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Predicting perception in noise using cortical auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Garnett P McMillan; Tina M Penman; Sun Mi Gille
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-13

3.  Masking Differentially Affects Envelope-following Responses in Young and Aged Animals.

Authors:  Jesyin Lai; Edward L Bartlett
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Electrophysiological responses to lateral shifts are not consistent with opponent-channel processing of interaural level differences.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins; Ann Clock Eddins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Neural encoding and perception of speech signals in informational masking.

Authors:  Keri O'Connell Bennett; Curtis J Billings; Michelle R Molis; Marjorie R Leek
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Aided cortical auditory evoked potentials in response to changes in hearing aid gain.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Kelly L Tremblay; Christi W Miller
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  Aided Electrophysiology Using Direct Audio Input: Effects of Amplification and Absolute Signal Level.

Authors:  Ingyu Chun; Curtis J Billings; Christi W Miller; Kelly L Tremblay
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.493

8.  Signal type and signal-to-noise ratio interact to affect cortical auditory evoked potentials.

Authors:  Curtis J Billings; Leslie D Grush
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Adaptive temporal encoding leads to a background-insensitive cortical representation of speech.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Sensitivity of the human auditory cortex to acoustic degradation of speech and non-speech sounds.

Authors:  Ismo Miettinen; Hannu Tiitinen; Paavo Alku; Patrick J C May
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.