Literature DB >> 24429136

Attentional Selection in a Cocktail Party Environment Can Be Decoded from Single-Trial EEG.

James A O'Sullivan1, Alan J Power2, Nima Mesgarani3, Siddharth Rajaram4, John J Foxe5, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham4, Malcolm Slaney6, Shihab A Shamma7, Edmund C Lalor1.   

Abstract

How humans solve the cocktail party problem remains unknown. However, progress has been made recently thanks to the realization that cortical activity tracks the amplitude envelope of speech. This has led to the development of regression methods for studying the neurophysiology of continuous speech. One such method, known as stimulus-reconstruction, has been successfully utilized with cortical surface recordings and magnetoencephalography (MEG). However, the former is invasive and gives a relatively restricted view of processing along the auditory hierarchy, whereas the latter is expensive and rare. Thus it would be extremely useful for research in many populations if stimulus-reconstruction was effective using electroencephalography (EEG), a widely available and inexpensive technology. Here we show that single-trial (≈60 s) unaveraged EEG data can be decoded to determine attentional selection in a naturalistic multispeaker environment. Furthermore, we show a significant correlation between our EEG-based measure of attention and performance on a high-level attention task. In addition, by attempting to decode attention at individual latencies, we identify neural processing at ∼200 ms as being critical for solving the cocktail party problem. These findings open up new avenues for studying the ongoing dynamics of cognition using EEG and for developing effective and natural brain-computer interfaces.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BCI; EEG; attention; cocktail party; speech; stimulus-reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24429136      PMCID: PMC4481604          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bht355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  25 in total

1.  At what time is the cocktail party? A late locus of selective attention to natural speech.

Authors:  Alan J Power; John J Foxe; Emma-Jane Forde; Richard B Reilly; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.386

2.  Neural coding of continuous speech in auditory cortex during monaural and dichotic listening.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Reading a neural code.

Authors:  W Bialek; F Rieke; R R de Ruyter van Steveninck; D Warland
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-06-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Influence of context and behavior on stimulus reconstruction from neural activity in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Nima Mesgarani; Stephen V David; Jonathan B Fritz; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Human auditory evoked potentials. II. Effects of attention.

Authors:  T W Picton; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1974-02

6.  Event-related brain potentials reveal similar attentional mechanisms during selective listening and shadowing.

Authors:  D L Woods; S A Hillyard; J C Hansen
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Mechanisms underlying selective neuronal tracking of attended speech at a "cocktail party".

Authors:  Elana M Zion Golumbic; Nai Ding; Stephan Bickel; Peter Lakatos; Catherine A Schevon; Guy M McKhann; Robert R Goodman; Ronald Emerson; Ashesh D Mehta; Jonathan Z Simon; David Poeppel; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Neuronal oscillations and speech perception: critical-band temporal envelopes are the essence.

Authors:  Oded Ghitza; Anne-Lise Giraud; David Poeppel
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Reconstructing speech from human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Brian N Pasley; Stephen V David; Nima Mesgarani; Adeen Flinker; Shihab A Shamma; Nathan E Crone; Robert T Knight; Edward F Chang
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Quantifying attentional modulation of auditory-evoked cortical responses from single-trial electroencephalography.

Authors:  Inyong Choi; Siddharth Rajaram; Lenny A Varghese; Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  129 in total

1.  Neural decoding of attentional selection in multi-speaker environments without access to clean sources.

Authors:  James O'Sullivan; Zhuo Chen; Jose Herrero; Guy M McKhann; Sameer A Sheth; Ashesh D Mehta; Nima Mesgarani
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-08-04       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Effects of Spectral Degradation on Attentional Modulation of Cortical Auditory Responses to Continuous Speech.

Authors:  Ying-Yee Kong; Ala Somarowthu; Nai Ding
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-09-11

Review 3.  Recent advances in exploring the neural underpinnings of auditory scene perception.

Authors:  Joel S Snyder; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 4.  Machine Learning Approaches to Analyze Speech-Evoked Neurophysiological Responses.

Authors:  Zilong Xie; Rachel Reetzke; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Evidence for enhanced neural tracking of the speech envelope underlying age-related speech-in-noise difficulties.

Authors:  Lien Decruy; Jonas Vanthornhout; Tom Francart
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Cortical encoding of acoustic and linguistic rhythms in spoken narratives.

Authors:  Cheng Luo; Nai Ding
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Neural tracking of attended versus ignored speech is differentially affected by hearing loss.

Authors:  Eline Borch Petersen; Malte Wöstmann; Jonas Obleser; Thomas Lunner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-05       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Semantic Context Enhances the Early Auditory Encoding of Natural Speech.

Authors:  Michael P Broderick; Andrew J Anderson; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  A Framework for Speech Activity Detection Using Adaptive Auditory Receptive Fields.

Authors:  Michael A Carlin; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Audio Speech Lang Process       Date:  2015-09-23

10.  Attention selectively modulates cortical entrainment in different regions of the speech spectrum.

Authors:  Lucas S Baltzell; Cort Horton; Yi Shen; Virginia M Richards; Michael D'Zmura; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.