Literature DB >> 20521859

Sound processing hierarchy within human auditory cortex.

Hidehiko Okamoto1, Henning Stracke, Patrick Bermudez, Christo Pantev.   

Abstract

Both attention and masking sounds can alter auditory neural processes and affect auditory signal perception. In the present study, we investigated the complex effects of auditory-focused attention and the signal-to-noise ratio of sound stimuli on three different auditory evoked field components (auditory steady-state response, N1m, and sustained field) by means of magnetoencephalography. The results indicate that the auditory steady-state response originating in primary auditory cortex reflects the signal-to-noise ratio of physical sound inputs (bottom-up process) rather than the listener's attentional state (top-down process), whereas the sustained field, originating in nonprimary auditory cortex, reflects the attentional state rather than the signal-to-noise ratio. The N1m was substantially influenced by both bottom-up and top-down neural processes. The differential sensitivity of the components to bottom-up and top-down neural processes, contingent on their level in the processing pathway, suggests a stream from bottom-up driven sensory neural processing to top-down driven auditory perception within human auditory cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20521859     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  20 in total

1.  Emergence of neural encoding of auditory objects while listening to competing speakers.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The modulatory influence of a predictive cue on the auditory steady-state response.

Authors:  Nathan Weisz; Françoise Lecaignard; Nadia Müller; Olivier Bertrand
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Tone language experience-dependent advantage in pitch representation in brainstem and auditory cortex is maintained under reverberation.

Authors:  Ananthanarayan Krishnan; Chandan H Suresh; Jackson T Gandour
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Evidence of degraded representation of speech in noise, in the aging midbrain and cortex.

Authors:  Alessandro Presacco; Jonathan Z Simon; Samira Anderson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Cortical Representations of Speech in a Multitalker Auditory Scene.

Authors:  Krishna C Puvvada; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Plasticity of human auditory-evoked fields induced by shock conditioning and contingency reversal.

Authors:  Christian Kluge; Markus Bauer; Alexander Paul Leff; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Raymond J Dolan; Jon Driver
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Adaptive temporal encoding leads to a background-insensitive cortical representation of speech.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Short and intense tailor-made notched music training against tinnitus: the tinnitus frequency matters.

Authors:  Henning Teismann; Hidehiko Okamoto; Christo Pantev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Spatial orienting in complex audiovisual environments.

Authors:  Davide Nardo; Valerio Santangelo; Emiliano Macaluso
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Effects of musical training and event probabilities on encoding of complex tone patterns.

Authors:  Anja Kuchenbuch; Evangelos Paraskevopoulos; Sibylle C Herholz; Christo Pantev
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.