Literature DB >> 30745419

Cortical Tracking of Speech-in-Noise Develops from Childhood to Adulthood.

Marc Vander Ghinst1,2, Mathieu Bourguignon3,4,5, Maxime Niesen3,2, Vincent Wens3,6, Sergio Hassid2, Georges Choufani2, Veikko Jousmäki7,8, Riitta Hari9, Serge Goldman3,6, Xavier De Tiège3,6.   

Abstract

In multitalker backgrounds, the auditory cortex of adult humans tracks the attended speech stream rather than the global auditory scene. Still, it is unknown whether such preferential tracking also occurs in children whose speech-in-noise (SiN) abilities are typically lower compared with adults. We used magnetoencephalography (MEG) to investigate the frequency-specific cortical tracking of different elements of a cocktail party auditory scene in 20 children (age range, 6-9 years; 8 females) and 20 adults (age range, 21-40 years; 10 females). During MEG recordings, subjects attended to four different 5 min stories, mixed with different levels of multitalker background at four signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs; noiseless, +5, 0, and -5 dB). Coherence analysis quantified the coupling between the time courses of the MEG activity and attended speech stream, multitalker background, or global auditory scene, respectively. In adults, statistically significant coherence was observed between MEG signals originating from the auditory system and the attended stream at <1, 1-4, and 4-8 Hz in all SNR conditions. Children displayed similar coupling at <1 and 1-4 Hz, but increasing noise impaired the coupling more strongly than in adults. Also, children displayed drastically lower coherence at 4-8 Hz in all SNR conditions. These results suggest that children's difficulties to understand speech in noisy conditions are related to an immature selective cortical tracking of the attended speech streams. Our results also provide unprecedented evidence for an acquired cortical tracking of speech at syllable rate and argue for a progressive development of SiN abilities in humans.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Behaviorally, children are less proficient than adults at understanding speech-in-noise. Here, neuromagnetic signals were recorded while healthy adults and typically developing 6- to 9-year-old children attended to a speech stream embedded in a multitalker background noise with varying intensity. Results demonstrate that auditory cortices of both children and adults selectively track the attended speaker's voice rather than the global acoustic input at phrasal and word rates. However, increments of noise compromised the tracking significantly more in children than in adults. Unexpectedly, children displayed limited tracking of both the attended voice and the global acoustic input at the 4-8 Hz syllable rhythm. Thus, both speech-in-noise abilities and cortical tracking of speech syllable repetition rate seem to mature later in adolescence.
Copyright © 2019 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coherence analysis; magnetoencephalography; speech-in-noise

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30745419      PMCID: PMC6462442          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1732-18.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  75 in total

1.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions.

Authors:  J Ashburner; K J Friston
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: a primer with examples.

Authors:  Thomas E Nichols; Andrew P Holmes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Central auditory processing assessment: a French-speaking battery.

Authors:  L Demanez; B Dony-Closon; E Lhonneux-Ledoux; J P Demanez
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg       Date:  2003

4.  Surrogate data analysis for assessing the significance of the coherence function.

Authors:  Luca Faes; Gian Domenico Pinna; Alberto Porta; Roberto Maestri; Giandomenico Nollo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.538

5.  Consonant identification in N-talker babble is a nonmonotonic function of N.

Authors:  Sarah A Simpson; Martin Cooke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Assessment of story comprehension deficits after brain damage.

Authors:  Evelyn C Ferstl; Katrin Walther; Thomas Guthke; D Yves von Cramon
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.475

7.  Dynamic imaging of coherent sources: Studying neural interactions in the human brain.

Authors:  J Gross; J Kujala; M Hamalainen; L Timmermann; A Schnitzler; R Salmelin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-01-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Left thalamo-cortical network implicated in successful speech separation and identification.

Authors:  Claude Alain; Karen Reinke; Kelly L McDonald; Wilkin Chau; Fred Tam; Anda Pacurar; Simon Graham
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Children's phoneme identification in reverberation and noise.

Authors:  C E Johnson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Statistical parametric mapping: assessment of application in children.

Authors:  O Muzik; D C Chugani; C Juhász; C Shen; H T Chugani
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  7 in total

1.  Lip-Reading Enables the Brain to Synthesize Auditory Features of Unknown Silent Speech.

Authors:  Mathieu Bourguignon; Martijn Baart; Efthymia C Kapnoula; Nicola Molinaro
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Gratifying Gizmos for Research and Clinical MEG.

Authors:  Veikko Jousmäki
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 3.  Oscillatory entrainment to our early social or physical environment and the emergence of volitional control.

Authors:  S V Wass; M Perapoch Amadó; J Ives
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 5.811

Review 4.  Studying the Developing Brain in Real-World Contexts: Moving From Castles in the Air to Castles on the Ground.

Authors:  Sam V Wass; Louise Goupil
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-13

5.  Development of neural oscillatory activity in response to speech in children from 4 to 6 years old.

Authors:  Paula Ríos-López; Nicola Molinaro; Mathieu Bourguignon; Marie Lallier
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2020-03-03

6.  A New Recognition Method for the Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields.

Authors:  Yulong Feng; Wei Xiao; Teng Wu; Jianwei Zhang; Jing Xiang; Hong Guo
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2021-02-09

7.  Nicotine Enhances Amplitude and Consistency of Timing of Responses to Acoustic Trains in A1.

Authors:  Irakli Intskirveli; Raju Metherate
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 3.342

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.