Literature DB >> 31371424

Semantic Context Enhances the Early Auditory Encoding of Natural Speech.

Michael P Broderick1, Andrew J Anderson2,3, Edmund C Lalor4,2,3.   

Abstract

Speech perception involves the integration of sensory input with expectations based on the context of that speech. Much debate surrounds the issue of whether or not prior knowledge feeds back to affect early auditory encoding in the lower levels of the speech processing hierarchy, or whether perception can be best explained as a purely feedforward process. Although there has been compelling evidence on both sides of this debate, experiments involving naturalistic speech stimuli to address these questions have been lacking. Here, we use a recently introduced method for quantifying the semantic context of speech and relate it to a commonly used method for indexing low-level auditory encoding of speech. The relationship between these measures is taken to be an indication of how semantic context leading up to a word influences how its low-level acoustic and phonetic features are processed. We record EEG from human participants (both male and female) listening to continuous natural speech and find that the early cortical tracking of a word's speech envelope is enhanced by its semantic similarity to its sentential context. Using a forward modeling approach, we find that prediction accuracy of the EEG signal also shows the same effect. Furthermore, this effect shows distinct temporal patterns of correlation depending on the type of speech input representation (acoustic or phonological) used for the model, implicating a top-down propagation of information through the processing hierarchy. These results suggest a mechanism that links top-down prior information with the early cortical entrainment of words in natural, continuous speech.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT During natural speech comprehension, we use semantic context when processing information about new incoming words. However, precisely how the neural processing of bottom-up sensory information is affected by top-down context-based predictions remains controversial. We address this discussion using a novel approach that indexes a word's similarity to context and how well a word's acoustic and phonetic features are processed by the brain at the time of its utterance. We relate these two measures and show that lower-level auditory tracking of speech improves for words that are more related to their preceding context. These results suggest a mechanism that links top-down prior information with bottom-up sensory processing in the context of natural, narrative speech listening.
Copyright © 2019 the authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  EEG; computational linguistics; natural speech; perception; semantic processing; top-down effects

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31371424      PMCID: PMC6750931          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0584-19.2019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  58 in total

1.  Merging information in speech recognition: feedback is never necessary.

Authors:  D Norris; J M McQueen; A Cutler
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Predictive coding in the visual cortex: a functional interpretation of some extra-classical receptive-field effects.

Authors:  R P Rao; D H Ballard
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Speech comprehension is correlated with temporal response patterns recorded from auditory cortex.

Authors:  E Ahissar; S Nagarajan; M Ahissar; A Protopapas; H Mahncke; M M Merzenich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Hierarchical processing in spoken language comprehension.

Authors:  Matthew H Davis; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis.

Authors:  Arnaud Delorme; Scott Makeig
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 2.390

6.  Neural substrates of phonemic perception.

Authors:  Einat Liebenthal; Jeffrey R Binder; Stephanie M Spitzer; Edward T Possing; David A Medler
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Dissociable controlled retrieval and generalized selection mechanisms in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  David Badre; Russell A Poldrack; E Juliana Paré-Blagoev; Rachel Z Insler; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity.

Authors:  Katherine A DeLong; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-10       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 9.  A theory of cortical responses.

Authors:  Karl Friston
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials.

Authors:  G A MILLER; G A HEISE; W LICHTEN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1951-05
View more
  19 in total

1.  Dynamic EEG analysis during language comprehension reveals interactive cascades between perceptual processing and sentential expectations.

Authors:  McCall E Sarrett; Bob McMurray; Efthymia C Kapnoula
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2020-10-18       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 2.  Speech rhythms and their neural foundations.

Authors:  David Poeppel; M Florencia Assaneo
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Preparatory delta phase response is correlated with naturalistic speech comprehension performance.

Authors:  Jiawei Li; Bo Hong; Guido Nolte; Andreas K Engel; Dan Zhang
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Envelope reconstruction of speech and music highlights stronger tracking of speech at low frequencies.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Zuk; Jeremy W Murphy; Richard B Reilly; Edmund C Lalor
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  Generalizable EEG Encoding Models with Naturalistic Audiovisual Stimuli.

Authors:  Maansi Desai; Jade Holder; Cassandra Villarreal; Nat Clark; Brittany Hoang; Liberty S Hamilton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  A hierarchy of linguistic predictions during natural language comprehension.

Authors:  Micha Heilbron; Kristijan Armeni; Jan-Mathijs Schoffelen; Peter Hagoort; Floris P de Lange
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 12.779

7.  Neural synchronization is strongest to the spectral flux of slow music and depends on familiarity and beat salience.

Authors:  Kristin Weineck; Olivia Xin Wen; Molly J Henry
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 8.713

8.  Rapid computations of spectrotemporal prediction error support perception of degraded speech.

Authors:  Ediz Sohoglu; Matthew H Davis
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Modulation Spectra Capture EEG Responses to Speech Signals and Drive Distinct Temporal Response Functions.

Authors:  Xiangbin Teng; Qinglin Meng; David Poeppel
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-01-14

10.  Effects of Hearing Aid Noise Reduction on Early and Late Cortical Representations of Competing Talkers in Noise.

Authors:  Emina Alickovic; Elaine Hoi Ning Ng; Lorenz Fiedler; Sébastien Santurette; Hamish Innes-Brown; Carina Graversen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.