Literature DB >> 22087916

The importance for speech intelligibility of random fluctuations in "steady" background noise.

Michael A Stone1, Christian Füllgrabe, Robert C Mackinnon, Brian C J Moore.   

Abstract

Spectrally shaped steady noise is commonly used as a masker of speech. The effects of inherent random fluctuations in amplitude of such a noise are typically ignored. Here, the importance of these random fluctuations was assessed by comparing two cases. For one, speech was mixed with steady speech-shaped noise and N-channel tone vocoded, a process referred to as signal-domain mixing (SDM); this preserved the random fluctuations of the noise. For the second, the envelope of speech alone was extracted for each vocoder channel and a constant was added corresponding to the root-mean-square value of the noise envelope for that channel. This is referred to as envelope-domain mixing (EDM); it removed the random fluctuations of the noise. Sinusoidally modulated noise and a single talker were also used as backgrounds, with both SDM and EDM. Speech intelligibility was measured for N = 12, 19, and 30, with the target-to-background ratio fixed at -7 dB. For SDM, performance was best for the speech background and worst for the steady noise. For EDM, this pattern was reversed. Intelligibility with steady noise was consistently very poor for SDM, but near-ceiling for EDM, demonstrating that the random fluctuations in steady noise have a large effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22087916     DOI: 10.1121/1.3641371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  31 in total

1.  Psychometric functions for sentence recognition in sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noises.

Authors:  Yi Shen; Nicole K Manzano; Virginia M Richards
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Robust Neuronal Discrimination in Primary Auditory Cortex Despite Degradations of Spectro-temporal Acoustic Details: Comparison Between Guinea Pigs with Normal Hearing and Mild Age-Related Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Yonane Aushana; Samira Souffi; Jean-Marc Edeline; Christian Lorenzi; Chloé Huetz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-01-04

3.  Exploring Use of the Coordinate Response Measure in a Multitalker Babble Paradigm.

Authors:  Larry E Humes; Gary R Kidd; Daniel Fogerty
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Modulation masking and glimpsing of natural and vocoded speech during single-talker modulated noise: Effect of the modulation spectrum.

Authors:  Daniel Fogerty; Jiaqian Xu; Bobby E Gibbs
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Speech Perception with Spectrally Non-overlapping Maskers as Measure of Spectral Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Erin R O'Neill; Heather A Kreft; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-11-19

6.  Intelligibility of whispered speech in stationary and modulated noise maskers.

Authors:  Richard L Freyman; Amanda M Griffin; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effects of linguistic experience on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral masker modulation.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Speech masking release in Hybrid cochlear implant users: Roles of spectral and temporal cues in electric-acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Factors Affecting Speech Reception in Background Noise with a Vocoder Implementation of the FAST Algorithm.

Authors:  Shaikat Hossain; Raymond L Goldsworthy
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-05-09

10.  Adaptive temporal encoding leads to a background-insensitive cortical representation of speech.

Authors:  Nai Ding; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.