PURPOSE: To determine whether radiation-induced changes in white matter tracts are uniform across the brainstem. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We analyzed serial diffusion tensor imaging data, acquired before radiation therapy and over 48 to 72 months of follow-up, from 42 pediatric patients (age 6-20 years) with medulloblastoma. FSL software (FMRIB, Oxford, UK) was used to calculate fractional anisotropy (FA) and axial, radial, and mean diffusivities. For a consistent identification of volumes of interest (VOIs), the parametric maps of each patient were transformed to a standard brain space (MNI152), on which we identified VOIs including corticospinal tract (CST), medial lemniscus (ML), transverse pontine fiber (TPF), and middle cerebellar peduncle (MCP) at the level of pons. Temporal changes of DTI parameters in VOIs were compared using a linear mixed effect model. RESULTS: Radiation-induced white matter injury was marked by a decline in FA after treatment. The decline was often accompanied by decreased axial diffusivity, increased radial diffusivity, or both. This implied axonal damage and demyelination. We observed that the magnitude of the changes was not always uniform across substructures of the brainstem. Specifically, the changes in DTI parameters for TPF were more pronounced than in other regions (P<.001 for FA) despite similarities in the distribution of dose. We did not find a significant difference among CST, ML, and MCP in these patients (P>.093 for all parameters). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in the structural integrity of white matter tracts, assessed by DTI, were not uniform across the brainstem after radiation therapy. These results support a role for tract-based assessment in radiation treatment planning and determination of brainstem tolerance.
PURPOSE: To determine whether radiation-induced changes in white matter tracts are uniform across the brainstem. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We analyzed serial diffusion tensor imaging data, acquired before radiation therapy and over 48 to 72 months of follow-up, from 42 pediatric patients (age 6-20 years) with medulloblastoma. FSL software (FMRIB, Oxford, UK) was used to calculate fractional anisotropy (FA) and axial, radial, and mean diffusivities. For a consistent identification of volumes of interest (VOIs), the parametric maps of each patient were transformed to a standard brain space (MNI152), on which we identified VOIs including corticospinal tract (CST), medial lemniscus (ML), transverse pontine fiber (TPF), and middle cerebellar peduncle (MCP) at the level of pons. Temporal changes of DTI parameters in VOIs were compared using a linear mixed effect model. RESULTS:Radiation-induced white matter injury was marked by a decline in FA after treatment. The decline was often accompanied by decreased axial diffusivity, increased radial diffusivity, or both. This implied axonal damage and demyelination. We observed that the magnitude of the changes was not always uniform across substructures of the brainstem. Specifically, the changes in DTI parameters for TPF were more pronounced than in other regions (P<.001 for FA) despite similarities in the distribution of dose. We did not find a significant difference among CST, ML, and MCP in these patients (P>.093 for all parameters). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in the structural integrity of white matter tracts, assessed by DTI, were not uniform across the brainstem after radiation therapy. These results support a role for tract-based assessment in radiation treatment planning and determination of brainstem tolerance.
Authors: Hendrik P Bijl; Peter van Luijk; Rob P Coppes; Jacobus M Schippers; Antonius W T Konings; Albert J van Der Kogel Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2005-02-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Dimitrios C Karampinos; Anh T Van; William C Olivero; John G Georgiadis; Bradley P Sutton Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Chiaho Hua; Thomas E Merchant; Amar Gajjar; Alberto Broniscer; Yong Zhang; Yimei Li; George R Glenn; Larry E Kun; Robert J Ogg Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-06-12 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: J Debus; E B Hug; N J Liebsch; D O'Farrel; D Finkelstein; J Efird; J E Munzenrider Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1997-12-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Vijaya Nagesh; Christina I Tsien; Thomas L Chenevert; Brian D Ross; Theodore S Lawrence; Larry Junick; Yue Cao Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-03-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Deqiang Qiu; Dora L W Kwong; Godfrey C F Chan; Lucullus H T Leung; Pek-Lan Khong Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-06-04 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jinsoo Uh; Thomas E Merchant; Yimei Li; Xingyu Li; Noah D Sabin; Daniel J Indelicato; Robert J Ogg; Frederick A Boop; John A Jane; Chiaho Hua Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2015-05-16 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Kathryn R Tringale; Tanya T Nguyen; Roshan Karunamuni; Tyler Seibert; Minh-Phuong Huynh-Le; Michael Connor; Vitali Moiseenko; Mary Kay Gorman; Anisa Marshall; Michelle Devereux Tibbs; Nikdokht Farid; Daniel Simpson; Parag Sanghvi; Carrie R McDonald; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2019-08-10 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Reza Farjam; Priyanka Pramanik; Madhava P Aryal; Ashok Srinivasan; Christopher H Chapman; Christina I Tsien; Theodore S Lawrence; Yue Cao Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2015-08-08 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Daniel M Trifiletti; Cheng-Chia Lee; William Winardi; Nirav V Patel; Chun-Po Yen; James M Larner; Jason P Sheehan Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2015-09-04 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Mary Baron Nelson; Paul M Macey; Ronald M Harper; Eufemia Jacob; Sunita K Patel; Jonathan L Finlay; Marvin D Nelson; Peggy Compton Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-05-16 Impact factor: 4.130