PURPOSE: To characterize therapy-induced changes in normal-appearing brainstems of childhood brain tumor patients by serial diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We analyzed 109 DTI studies from 20 brain tumor patients, aged 4 to 23 years, with normal-appearing brainstems included in the treatment fields. Those with medulloblastomas, supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors, and atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors (n = 10) received postoperative craniospinal irradiation (23.4-39.6 Gy) and a cumulative dose of 55.8 Gy to the primary site, followed by four cycles of high-dose chemotherapy. Patients with high-grade gliomas (n = 10) received erlotinib during and after irradiation (54-59.4 Gy). Parametric maps of fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were computed and spatially registered to three-dimensional radiation dose data. Volumes of interest included corticospinal tracts, medial lemnisci, and the pons. Serving as an age-related benchmark for comparison, 37 DTI studies from 20 healthy volunteers, aged 6 to 25 years, were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The median DTI follow-up time was 3.5 years (range, 1.6-5.0 years). The median mean dose to the pons was 56 Gy (range, 7-59 Gy). Three patterns were seen in longitudinal FA and apparent diffusion coefficient changes: (1) a stable or normal developing time trend, (2) initial deviation from normal with subsequent recovery, and (3) progressive deviation without evidence of complete recovery. The maximal decline in FA often occurred 1.5 to 3.5 years after the start of radiation therapy. A full recovery time trend could be observed within 4 years. Patients with incomplete recovery often had a larger decline in FA within the first year. Radiation dose alone did not predict long-term recovery patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Variations existed among individual patients after therapy in longitudinal evolution of brainstem white matter injury and recovery. Early response in brainstem anisotropy may serve as an indicator of the recovery time trend over 5 years after radiation therapy. Copyright Â
PURPOSE: To characterize therapy-induced changes in normal-appearing brainstems of childhood brain tumorpatients by serial diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We analyzed 109 DTI studies from 20 brain tumorpatients, aged 4 to 23 years, with normal-appearing brainstems included in the treatment fields. Those with medulloblastomas, supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumors, and atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors (n = 10) received postoperative craniospinal irradiation (23.4-39.6 Gy) and a cumulative dose of 55.8 Gy to the primary site, followed by four cycles of high-dose chemotherapy. Patients with high-grade gliomas (n = 10) received erlotinib during and after irradiation (54-59.4 Gy). Parametric maps of fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were computed and spatially registered to three-dimensional radiation dose data. Volumes of interest included corticospinal tracts, medial lemnisci, and the pons. Serving as an age-related benchmark for comparison, 37 DTI studies from 20 healthy volunteers, aged 6 to 25 years, were included in the analysis. RESULTS: The median DTI follow-up time was 3.5 years (range, 1.6-5.0 years). The median mean dose to the pons was 56 Gy (range, 7-59 Gy). Three patterns were seen in longitudinal FA and apparent diffusion coefficient changes: (1) a stable or normal developing time trend, (2) initial deviation from normal with subsequent recovery, and (3) progressive deviation without evidence of complete recovery. The maximal decline in FA often occurred 1.5 to 3.5 years after the start of radiation therapy. A full recovery time trend could be observed within 4 years. Patients with incomplete recovery often had a larger decline in FA within the first year. Radiation dose alone did not predict long-term recovery patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Variations existed among individual patients after therapy in longitudinal evolution of brainstem white matter injury and recovery. Early response in brainstem anisotropy may serve as an indicator of the recovery time trend over 5 years after radiation therapy. Copyright Â
Authors: Pek-Lan Khong; Lucullus H T Leung; Godfrey C F Chan; Dora L W Kwong; Wilfred H S Wong; Guang Cao; Gaik-Cheng Ooi Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: K J Helton; N S Phillips; R B Khan; F A Boop; R A Sanford; P Zou; C S Li; J W Langston; R J Ogg Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Yvonne W Lui; Meng Law; Jeena Chacko-Mathew; James S Babb; Keren Tuvia; Jeffrey C Allen; David Zagzag; Glyn Johnson Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Pek-Lan Khong; Lucullus H T Leung; Amy S M Fung; Daniel Y T Fong; Deqiang Qiu; Dora L W Kwong; Gaik-Cheng Ooi; Grainne McAlonan; Grainne McAlanon; Guang Cao; Godfrey C F Chan Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-02-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Pek-Lan Khong; Dora L W Kwong; Godfrey C F Chan; Jonathan S T Sham; Fu-Luk Chan; Gaik-Cheng Ooi Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Jinsoo Uh; Thomas E Merchant; Yimei Li; Xingyu Li; Noah D Sabin; Daniel J Indelicato; Robert J Ogg; Frederick A Boop; John A Jane; Chiaho Hua Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2015-05-16 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Iman Sahnoune; Taeko Inoue; Shelli R Kesler; Shaefali P Rodgers; Omaima M Sabek; Steen E Pedersen; Janice A Zawaski; Katharine H Nelson; M Douglas Ris; J Leigh Leasure; M Waleed Gaber Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2018-04-09 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Mary Baron Nelson; Peggy Compton; Paul M Macey; Sunita K Patel; Eufemia Jacob; Sharon O'Neil; Jennifer Ogren; Jonathan L Finlay; Ronald M Harper Journal: J Pediatr Oncol Nurs Date: 2015-07-27 Impact factor: 1.636
Authors: Tong Zhu; Christopher H Chapman; Christina Tsien; Michelle Kim; Daniel E Spratt; Theodore S Lawrence; Yue Cao Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2016-07-21 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: J Nowak; C Seidel; F Berg; T Pietsch; C Friedrich; K von Hoff; S Rutkowski; M Warmuth-Metz Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-06-19 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Reza Farjam; Priyanka Pramanik; Madhava P Aryal; Ashok Srinivasan; Christopher H Chapman; Christina I Tsien; Theodore S Lawrence; Yue Cao Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2015-08-08 Impact factor: 7.038