Literature DB >> 29619963

National Cancer Institute Workshop on Proton Therapy for Children: Considerations Regarding Brainstem Injury.

Daphne Haas-Kogan1, Daniel Indelicato2, Harald Paganetti3, Natia Esiashvili4, Anita Mahajan5, Torunn Yock3, Stella Flampouri2, Shannon MacDonald3, Maryam Fouladi6, Kry Stephen7, John Kalapurakal8, Stephanie Terezakis9, Hanne Kooy3, David Grosshans7, Mike Makrigiorgos10, Kavita Mishra11, Tina Young Poussaint12, Kenneth Cohen13, Thomas Fitzgerald14, Vinai Gondi15, Arthur Liu16, Jeff Michalski17, Dragan Mirkovic7, Radhe Mohan7, Stephanie Perkins17, Kenneth Wong18, Bhadrasain Vikram19, Jeff Buchsbaum19, Larry Kun20.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Proton therapy can allow for superior avoidance of normal tissues. A widespread consensus has been reached that proton therapy should be used for patients with curable pediatric brain tumor to avoid critical central nervous system structures. Brainstem necrosis is a potentially devastating, but rare, complication of radiation. Recent reports of brainstem necrosis after proton therapy have raised concerns over the potential biological differences among radiation modalities. We have summarized findings from the National Cancer Institute Workshop on Proton Therapy for Children convened in May 2016 to examine brainstem injury. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-seven physicians, physicists, and researchers from 17 institutions with expertise met to discuss this issue. The definition of brainstem injury, imaging of this entity, clinical experience with photons and photons, and potential biological differences among these radiation modalities were thoroughly discussed and reviewed. The 3 largest US pediatric proton therapy centers collectively summarized the incidence of symptomatic brainstem injury and physics details (planning, dosimetry, delivery) for 671 children with focal posterior fossa tumors treated with protons from 2006 to 2016.
RESULTS: The average rate of symptomatic brainstem toxicity from the 3 largest US pediatric proton centers was 2.38%. The actuarial rate of grade ≥2 brainstem toxicity was successfully reduced from 12.7% to 0% at 1 center after adopting modified radiation guidelines. Guidelines for treatment planning and current consensus brainstem constraints for proton therapy are presented. The current knowledge regarding linear energy transfer (LET) and its relationship to relative biological effectiveness (RBE) are defined. We review the current state of LET-based planning.
CONCLUSIONS: Brainstem injury is a rare complication of radiation therapy for both photons and protons. Substantial dosimetric data have been collected for brainstem injury after proton therapy, and established guidelines to allow for safe delivery of proton radiation have been defined. Increased capability exists to incorporate LET optimization; however, further research is needed to fully explore the capabilities of LET- and RBE-based planning.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29619963      PMCID: PMC5903576          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  69 in total

1.  MR Imaging Characteristics of Wingless-Type-Subgroup Pediatric Medulloblastoma.

Authors:  Z Patay; L A DeSain; S N Hwang; A Coan; Y Li; D W Ellison
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Rapid RBE-Weighted Proton Radiation Dosimetry Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Mohammad A Z Qutub; Susan B Klein; Jeffrey C Buchsbaum
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-08-17

3.  How Will Big Data Impact Clinical Decision Making and Precision Medicine in Radiation Therapy?

Authors:  Ronald C Chen; Peter E Gabriel; Brian D Kavanagh; Todd R McNutt
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 4.  Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. Variations as a function of biological endpoint, dose, and linear energy transfer.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Variable Proton Relative Biological Effectiveness: How Do We Move Forward?

Authors:  Tracy Underwood; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Compensating for heterogeneities in proton radiation therapy.

Authors:  M Urie; M Goitein; M Wagner
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Quality of life outcomes in proton and photon treated pediatric brain tumor survivors.

Authors:  Torunn I Yock; Sundeep Bhat; Jackie Szymonifka; Beow Y Yeap; Jennifer Delahaye; Sarah S Donaldson; Shannon M MacDonald; Margaret B Pulsifer; Kristen S Hill; Thomas F DeLaney; David Ebb; Mary Huang; Nancy J Tarbell; Paul Graham Fisher; Karen A Kuhlthau
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2014-10-07       Impact factor: 6.280

8.  Proton radiotherapy for childhood ependymoma: initial clinical outcomes and dose comparisons.

Authors:  Shannon M MacDonald; Sairos Safai; Alexei Trofimov; John Wolfgang; Barbara Fullerton; Beow Y Yeap; Thomas Bortfeld; Nancy J Tarbell; Torunn Yock
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Significance and implementation of RBE variations in proton beam therapy.

Authors:  H Paganetti
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2003-10

10.  Low early ototoxicity rates for pediatric medulloblastoma patients treated with proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  Benjamin J Moeller; Murali Chintagumpala; Jimmy J Philip; David R Grosshans; Mary F McAleer; Shiao Y Woo; Paul W Gidley; Tribhawan S Vats; Anita Mahajan
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  34 in total

Review 1.  Treatment planning for proton therapy: what is needed in the next 10 years?

Authors:  Hakan Nystrom; Maria Fuglsang Jensen; Petra Witt Nystrom
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Proton beam therapy for cancer.

Authors:  Derek S Tsang; Samir Patel
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Particle Radiation Induced Neurotoxicity in the Central Nervous System.

Authors:  David R Grosshans; Joseph G Duman; M Waleed Gaber; Gabriel Sawakuchi
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2018-09-21

Review 4.  Proton beam therapy: perspectives on the National Health Service England clinical service and research programme.

Authors:  Neil G Burnet; Ranald I Mackay; Ed Smith; Amy L Chadwick; Gillian A Whitfield; David J Thomson; Matthew Lowe; Norman F Kirkby; Adrian M Crellin; Karen J Kirkby
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Reply to S.A. Milgrom et al.

Authors:  Lisa S Kahalley; Rachel Peterson; M Douglas Ris; Laura Janzen; M Fatih Okcu; David R Grosshans; Vijay Ramaswamy; Arnold C Paulino; David Hodgson; Anita Mahajan; Derek S Tsang; Normand Laperriere; William E Whitehead; Robert C Dauser; Michael D Taylor; Eric Bouffet; Murali Chintagumpala; Donald Mabbott
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Proton therapy for brain tumours in the area of evidence-based medicine.

Authors:  Damien C Weber; Pei S Lim; Sebastien Tran; Marc Walser; Alessandra Bolsi; Ulrike Kliebsch; Jürgen Beer; Barbara Bachtiary; Tony Lomax; Alessia Pica
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Increased risk of pseudoprogression among pediatric low-grade glioma patients treated with proton versus photon radiotherapy.

Authors:  Ethan B Ludmir; Anita Mahajan; Arnold C Paulino; Jeremy Y Jones; Leena M Ketonen; Jack M Su; David R Grosshans; Mary Frances McAleer; Susan L McGovern; Yasmin A Lassen-Ramshad; Adekunle M Adesina; Robert C Dauser; Jeffrey S Weinberg; Murali M Chintagumpala
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 12.300

8.  Radiation-induced brain injury in patients with meningioma treated with proton or photon therapy.

Authors:  Jiheon Song; Saif Aljabab; Lulwah Abduljabbar; Yolanda D Tseng; Jason K Rockhill; James R Fink; Lynn Chang; Lia M Halasz
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 4.130

9.  Clinical Implementation of Proton Therapy Using Pencil-Beam Scanning Delivery Combined With Static Apertures.

Authors:  Christian Bäumer; Sandija Plaude; Dalia Ahmad Khalil; Dirk Geismar; Paul-Heinz Kramer; Kevin Kröninger; Christian Nitsch; Jörg Wulff; Beate Timmermann
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Postsurgical geometrical variations of tumor bed and brainstem during photon and proton therapy for pediatric tumors of the posterior fossa: dosimetric impact and predictive factors.

Authors:  Stefania Volpe; Pierre-Yves Bondiau; Line Claude; Audrey Claren; Laetitia Padovani; Hamza AlGhamdi; Gwenaëlle Duhil De Benaze; Lucas Opitz; Guillaume Baudin; Catherine Dejean; Daniel Maneval; Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa; Jérôme Doyen
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2021-08-05       Impact factor: 3.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.