Kathryn R Tringale1, Tanya T Nguyen2, Roshan Karunamuni3, Tyler Seibert3, Minh-Phuong Huynh-Le4, Michael Connor4, Vitali Moiseenko4, Mary Kay Gorman4, Anisa Marshall5, Michelle Devereux Tibbs4, Nikdokht Farid6, Daniel Simpson4, Parag Sanghvi4, Carrie R McDonald7, Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth8. 1. Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences; Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. 2. Department of Psychiatry. 3. Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences; Center for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics. 4. Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences. 5. Center for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics. 6. Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California. 7. Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences; Department of Psychiatry; Center for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics. 8. Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences; Center for Multimodal Imaging and Genetics. Electronic address: jhattangadi@ucsd.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We used quantitative magnetic resonance imaging to prospectively analyze the association between microstructural damage to memory-associated structures within the medial temporal lobe and longitudinal memory performance after brain radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with a primary brain tumor receiving fractionated brain RT were enrolled on a prospective trial (n = 27). Patients underwent high-resolution volumetric brain magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and neurocognitive testing before and 3, 6, and 12 months post-RT. Medial temporal lobe regions (hippocampus; entorhinal, parahippocampal, and temporal pole white matter [WM]) were autosegmented, quantifying volume and diffusion biomarkers of WM integrity (mean diffusivity [MD]; fractional anisotropy [FA]). Reliable change indices measured changes in verbal (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised) and visuospatial (Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised [BVMT-R]) memory. Linear mixed-effects models assessed longitudinal associations between imaging parameters and memory. RESULTS: Visuospatial memory significantly declined at 6 months post-RT (mean reliable change indices, -1.3; P = .012). Concurrent chemotherapy and seizures trended toward a significant association with greater decline in visuospatial memory (P = .053 and P = .054, respectively). Higher mean dose to the left temporal pole WM was significantly associated with decreased FA (r = -0.667; P = .002). Over all time points, smaller right hippocampal volume (P = .021), lower right entorhinal FA (P = .023), greater right entorhinal MD (P = .047), and greater temporal pole MD (BVMT-R total recall, P = .003; BVMT-R delayed recall, P = .042) were associated with worse visuospatial memory. The interaction between right entorhinal MD (BVMT-R total recall, P = .021; BVMT-R delayed recall, P = .004) and temporal pole FA (BVMT-R delayed recall, P = .024) significantly predicted visuospatial memory performance. CONCLUSIONS: Brain tumor patients exhibited visuospatial memory decline post-RT. Microstructural damage to critical memory regions, including the hippocampus and medial temporal lobe WM, were associated with post-RT memory decline. The integrity of medial temporal lobe structures is critical to memory performance post-RT, representing possible avoidance targets for memory preservation.
PURPOSE: We used quantitative magnetic resonance imaging to prospectively analyze the association between microstructural damage to memory-associated structures within the medial temporal lobe and longitudinal memory performance after brain radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with a primary brain tumor receiving fractionated brain RT were enrolled on a prospective trial (n = 27). Patients underwent high-resolution volumetric brain magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and neurocognitive testing before and 3, 6, and 12 months post-RT. Medial temporal lobe regions (hippocampus; entorhinal, parahippocampal, and temporal pole white matter [WM]) were autosegmented, quantifying volume and diffusion biomarkers of WM integrity (mean diffusivity [MD]; fractional anisotropy [FA]). Reliable change indices measured changes in verbal (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised) and visuospatial (Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised [BVMT-R]) memory. Linear mixed-effects models assessed longitudinal associations between imaging parameters and memory. RESULTS: Visuospatial memory significantly declined at 6 months post-RT (mean reliable change indices, -1.3; P = .012). Concurrent chemotherapy and seizures trended toward a significant association with greater decline in visuospatial memory (P = .053 and P = .054, respectively). Higher mean dose to the left temporal pole WM was significantly associated with decreased FA (r = -0.667; P = .002). Over all time points, smaller right hippocampal volume (P = .021), lower right entorhinal FA (P = .023), greater right entorhinal MD (P = .047), and greater temporal pole MD (BVMT-R total recall, P = .003; BVMT-R delayed recall, P = .042) were associated with worse visuospatial memory. The interaction between right entorhinal MD (BVMT-R total recall, P = .021; BVMT-R delayed recall, P = .004) and temporal pole FA (BVMT-R delayed recall, P = .024) significantly predicted visuospatial memory performance. CONCLUSIONS:Brain tumorpatients exhibited visuospatial memory declinepost-RT. Microstructural damage to critical memory regions, including the hippocampus and medial temporal lobe WM, were associated with post-RT memory decline. The integrity of medial temporal lobe structures is critical to memory performance post-RT, representing possible avoidance targets for memory preservation.
Authors: Jorge Jovicich; Silvester Czanner; Douglas Greve; Elizabeth Haley; Andre van der Kouwe; Randy Gollub; David Kennedy; Franz Schmitt; Gregory Brown; James Macfall; Bruce Fischl; Anders Dale Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2005-11-21 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: N Erkut Kucukboyaci; H M Girard; D J Hagler; J Kuperman; E S Tecoma; V J Iragui; E Halgren; C R McDonald Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2011-10-12 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Christopher H Chapman; Vijaya Nagesh; Pia C Sundgren; Henry Buchtel; Thomas L Chenevert; Larry Junck; Theodore S Lawrence; Christina I Tsien; Yue Cao Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-05-11 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Ann M Peiffer; C Marc Leyrer; Dana M Greene-Schloesser; Elaine Shing; William T Kearns; William H Hinson; Stephen B Tatter; Edward H Ip; Stephen R Rapp; Mike E Robbins; Edward G Shaw; Michael D Chan Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-02-06 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Steven H J Nagtegaal; Szabolcs David; Marielle E P Philippens; Tom J Snijders; Alexander Leemans; Joost J C Verhoeff Journal: Clin Transl Radiat Oncol Date: 2020-11-15
Authors: Mia Salans; Michelle D Tibbs; Roshan Karunamuni; Anthony Yip; Minh-Phuong Huynh-Le; Anna Christina Macari; Anny Reyes; Kathryn Tringale; Carrie R McDonald; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2021-08-02 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Minh-Phuong Huynh-Le; Michelle D Tibbs; Roshan Karunamuni; Mia Salans; Kathryn R Tringale; Anthony Yip; Michael Connor; Aaron B Simon; Lucas K Vitzthum; Anny Reyes; Anna Christina Macari; Vitali Moiseenko; Carrie R McDonald; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 8.013
Authors: Bo Xu Ren; Isaac Huen; Zi Jun Wu; Hong Wang; Meng Yun Duan; Ilonka Guenther; K N Bhanu Prakash; Feng Ru Tang Journal: BMC Neurosci Date: 2021-04-21 Impact factor: 3.288
Authors: Ilinca Popp; Alexander Rau; Elias Kellner; Marco Reisert; Jamina Tara Fennell; Thomas Rothe; Carsten Nieder; Horst Urbach; Karl Egger; Anca Ligia Grosu; Christoph P Kaller Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-08-19 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: Mia Salans; Michelle D Tibbs; Minh-Phuong Huynh-Le; Anthony Yip; Kathryn Tringale; Roshan Karunamuni; Ronghui Xu; Anny Reyes; Anna Christina Macari; Tonya Pan-Weisz; Carrie R McDonald; Jona A Hattangadi-Gluth Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2021-06-06 Impact factor: 7.038