Literature DB >> 25054821

Emerging methods for disease monitoring in malignant gliomas.

Prakash Ambady1, Chetan Bettegowda, Matthias Holdhoff.   

Abstract

MRI remains the backbone of measuring disease burden and treatment response in individuals with malignant gliomas. Traditional radiographic approaches, however, are largely limited to depicting anatomic changes and are not a direct measure of disease burden. For example, contrast enhancement is related to blood-brain barrier integrity rather than actual tumor size. Without accurate measures of disease, common clinical dilemmas include 'pseudo-progression' (e.g., after chemoradiation) or 'pseudo-response' (e.g., with steroid treatment and antiangiogenic agents), which can lead to delays in therapy, premature discontinuation of successful treatments and to unnecessary surgical procedures. This overview focuses on novel, minimally invasive approaches in the area of imaging and blood-based biomarkers that aim to more accurately determine disease status and response to treatment in malignant brain tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 25054821      PMCID: PMC4986516          DOI: 10.2217/cns.13.44

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CNS Oncol        ISSN: 2045-0907


  90 in total

1.  Acute effects of stereotactic radiosurgery on the kinetics of glucose metabolism in metastatic brain tumors: FDG PET study.

Authors:  T Yamamoto; S Nishizawa; I Maruyama; M Yoshida; T Tsuchida; A Waki; Y Fujibayashi; T Kubota; Y Yonekura; H Itoh
Journal:  Ann Nucl Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.668

2.  Diffusion tensor imaging for differentiation of recurrent brain tumor and radiation necrosis after radiotherapy--three case reports.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kashimura; Takashi Inoue; Takaaki Beppu; Kuniaki Ogasawara; Akira Ogawa
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 1.876

Review 3.  Molecular imaging of gliomas with PET: opportunities and limitations.

Authors:  Christian la Fougère; Bogdana Suchorska; Peter Bartenstein; Friedrich-Wilhelm Kreth; Jörg-Christian Tonn
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Blood alterations preceding clinical manifestation of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Aysegül Ilhan-Mutlu; Ludwig Wagner; Adelheid Wöhrer; Susanne Jungwirth; Christine Marosi; Peter Fischer; Matthias Preusser
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 2.176

5.  O6-methyl-guanine-DNA methyltransferase methylation in serum and tumor DNA predicts response to 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea but not to temozolamide plus cisplatin in glioblastoma multiforme.

Authors:  Carme Balaña; Jose Luis Ramirez; Miquel Taron; Yannis Roussos; Aurelio Ariza; Rosa Ballester; Carme Sarries; Pedro Mendez; Jose Javier Sanchez; Rafael Rosell
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Contiguous glioblastoma multiforme and fibrosarcoma with extracranial metastasis.

Authors:  D R Smith; J M Hardman; K M Earle
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1969-08       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Prospective analysis of parametric response map-derived MRI biomarkers: identification of early and distinct glioma response patterns not predicted by standard radiographic assessment.

Authors:  Craig J Galbán; Thomas L Chenevert; Charles R Meyer; Christina Tsien; Theodore S Lawrence; Daniel A Hamstra; Larry Junck; Pia C Sundgren; Timothy D Johnson; Stefanie Galbán; Judith S Sebolt-Leopold; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 12.531

8.  Glial tumor grading and outcome prediction using dynamic spin-echo MR susceptibility mapping compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR: confounding effect of elevated rCBV of oligodendrogliomas [corrected].

Authors:  Michael H Lev; Yelda Ozsunar; John W Henson; Amjad A Rasheed; Glenn D Barest; Griffith R Harsh; Markus M Fitzek; E Antonio Chiocca; James D Rabinov; Andrew N Csavoy; Bruce R Rosen; Fred H Hochberg; Pamela W Schaefer; R Gilberto Gonzalez
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Comparison of 18F-FDG and 11C-methionine for PET-guided stereotactic brain biopsy of gliomas.

Authors:  Benoit Pirotte; Serge Goldman; Nicolas Massager; Philippe David; David Wikler; Arlette Vandesteene; Isabelle Salmon; Jacques Brotchi; Marc Levivier
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Self-assembling nanocomplexes by combining ferumoxytol, heparin and protamine for cell tracking by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Mya S Thu; L Henry Bryant; Tiziana Coppola; E Kay Jordan; Matthew D Budde; Bobbi K Lewis; Aneeka Chaudhry; Jiaqiang Ren; Nadimpalli Ravi S Varma; Ali S Arbab; Joseph A Frank
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 53.440

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Glioblastoma multiforme: emerging treatments and stratification markers beyond new drugs.

Authors:  C von Neubeck; A Seidlitz; H H Kitzler; B Beuthien-Baumann; M Krause
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Liquid Biopsy Strategies to Distinguish Progression from Pseudoprogression and Radiation Necrosis in Glioblastomas.

Authors:  Anudeep Yekula; Koushik Muralidharan; Zachary S Rosh; Anna E Youngkin; Keiko M Kang; Leonora Balaj; Bob S Carter
Journal:  Adv Biosyst       Date:  2020-06-02

3.  Patterns of relapse in primary central nervous system lymphoma: inferences regarding the role of the neuro-vascular unit and monoclonal antibodies in treating occult CNS disease.

Authors:  Prakash Ambady; Rongwei Fu; Joao Prola Netto; Cymon Kersch; Jenny Firkins; Nancy D Doolittle; Edward A Neuwelt
Journal:  Fluids Barriers CNS       Date:  2017-06-02

4.  The consistency of neuropathological diagnoses in patients undergoing surgery for suspected recurrence of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Matthias Holdhoff; Xiaobu Ye; Anna F Piotrowski; Peter C Burger; Roy E Strowd; Shannon Seopaul; Yao Lu; Norman J Barker; Ananyaa Sivakumar; Fausto J Rodriguez; Stuart A Grossman
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Biomarkers Reflecting The Destruction Of The Blood-Brain Barrier Are Valuable In Predicting The Risk Of Lymphomas With Central Nervous System Involvement.

Authors:  Wenjun Yu; Mengya Si; Li Li; Ping He; Zhiqiang Fan; Qiaoxin Zhang; Xiaoyang Jiao
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 4.147

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.