Literature DB >> 22922331

Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids.

Julian R Jones1.   

Abstract

Bioactive glasses are reported to be able to stimulate more bone regeneration than other bioactive ceramics but they lag behind other bioactive ceramics in terms of commercial success. Bioactive glass has not yet reached its potential but research activity is growing. This paper reviews the current state of the art, starting with current products and moving onto recent developments. Larry Hench's 45S5 Bioglass® was the first artificial material that was found to form a chemical bond with bone, launching the field of bioactive ceramics. In vivo studies have shown that bioactive glasses bond with bone more rapidly than other bioceramics, and in vitro studies indicate that their osteogenic properties are due to their dissolution products stimulating osteoprogenitor cells at the genetic level. However, calcium phosphates such as tricalcium phosphate and synthetic hydroxyapatite are more widely used in the clinic. Some of the reasons are commercial, but others are due to the scientific limitations of the original Bioglass 45S5. An example is that it is difficult to produce porous bioactive glass templates (scaffolds) for bone regeneration from Bioglass 45S5 because it crystallizes during sintering. Recently, this has been overcome by understanding how the glass composition can be tailored to prevent crystallization. The sintering problems can also be avoided by synthesizing sol-gel glass, where the silica network is assembled at room temperature. Process developments in foaming, solid freeform fabrication and nanofibre spinning have now allowed the production of porous bioactive glass scaffolds from both melt- and sol-gel-derived glasses. An ideal scaffold for bone regeneration would share load with bone. Bioceramics cannot do this when the bone defect is subjected to cyclic loads, as they are brittle. To overcome this, bioactive glass polymer hybrids are being synthesized that have the potential to be tough, with congruent degradation of the bioactive inorganic and the polymer components. Key to this is creating nanoscale interpenetrating networks, the organic and inorganic components of which have covalent coupling between them, which involves careful control of the chemistry of the sol-gel process. Bioactive nanoparticles can also now be synthesized and their fate tracked as they are internalized in cells. This paper reviews the main developments in the field of bioactive glass and its variants, covering the importance of control of hierarchical structure, synthesis, processing and cellular response in the quest for new regenerative synthetic bone grafts. The paper takes the reader from Hench's Bioglass 45S5 to new hybrid materials that have tailorable mechanical properties and degradation rates.
Copyright © 2012 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22922331     DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  233 in total

Review 1.  Bioactive-glass in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Andrea Corrado Profeta; Christoph Huppa
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2015-05-21

2.  Rheological evaluations and in vitro studies of injectable bioactive glass-polycaprolactone-sodium alginate composites.

Authors:  Shokoufeh Borhan; Saeed Hesaraki; Ali-Asghar Behnamghader; Ebrahim Ghasemi
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Enhanced osteointegration of poly(methylmethacrylate) bone cements by incorporating strontium-containing borate bioactive glass.

Authors:  Xu Cui; Chengcheng Huang; Meng Zhang; Changshun Ruan; Songlin Peng; Li Li; Wenlong Liu; Ting Wang; Bing Li; Wenhai Huang; Mohamed N Rahaman; William W Lu; Haobo Pan
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 4.  The future of bioactive ceramics.

Authors:  Larry L Hench
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Investigating the influence of Na+ and Sr2+ on the structure and solubility of SiO2-TiO2-CaO-Na2O/SrO bioactive glass.

Authors:  Y Li; L M Placek; A Coughlan; F R Laffir; D Pradhan; N P Mellott; A W Wren
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 3.896

6.  Mechanical properties of bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds fabricated by robotic deposition for structural bone repair.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Mohamed N Rahaman; Gregory E Hilmas; B Sonny Bal
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 8.947

7.  A unified in vitro evaluation for apatite-forming ability of bioactive glasses and their variants.

Authors:  Anthony L B Maçon; Taek B Kim; Esther M Valliant; Kathryn Goetschius; Richard K Brow; Delbert E Day; Alexander Hoppe; Aldo R Boccaccini; Ill Yong Kim; Chikara Ohtsuki; Tadashi Kokubo; Akiyoshi Osaka; Maria Vallet-Regí; Daniel Arcos; Leandro Fraile; Antonio J Salinas; Alexandra V Teixeira; Yuliya Vueva; Rui M Almeida; Marta Miola; Chiara Vitale-Brovarone; Enrica Verné; Wolfram Höland; Julian R Jones
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Functionally graded biomaterials for use as model systems and replacement tissues.

Authors:  Jeremy M Lowen; J Kent Leach
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 18.808

9.  Nano-Structured Gelatin/Bioactive Glass Hybrid Scaffolds for the Enhancement of Odontogenic Differentiation of Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells.

Authors:  Tiejun Qu; Xiaohua Liu
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2013-10-07       Impact factor: 6.331

10.  Compressive fatigue and fracture toughness behavior of injectable, settable bone cements.

Authors:  Andrew J Harmata; Sasidhar Uppuganti; Mathilde Granke; Scott A Guelcher; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2015-08-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.