Literature DB >> 16359252

Bone graft substitutes.

Cato Laurencin1, Yusuf Khan, Saadiq F El-Amin.   

Abstract

The current gold standard of bone grafts is the autograft since it possesses all the characteristics necessary for new bone growth, namely osteoconductivity, osteogenicity and osteoinductivity. However, the autograft has its limitations, including donor-site morbidity and supply limitations, hindering this as an option for bone repair. An extensive list of currently available alternatives to bone grafts is provided, along with a classification scheme that divides these bone graft substitutes into five groups depending on the primary material composition: allograft, cell, factor, ceramic and polymer. Of the bone graft substitutes listed, several are discussed in detail. Beyond the current state of the art, attention is paid to what lies ahead in the field of bone graft substitutes. Biodegradable composite structures and various new architectures are discussed, as are newly developed polymeric materials, with tissue engineering providing the platform for future directions within this discipline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16359252     DOI: 10.1586/17434440.3.1.49

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Med Devices        ISSN: 1743-4440            Impact factor:   3.166


  134 in total

1.  Development of non-invasive Raman spectroscopy for in vivo evaluation of bone graft osseointegration in a rat model.

Authors:  Paul I Okagbare; Francis W L Esmonde-White; Steven A Goldstein; Michael D Morris
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 4.616

2.  Differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells on niobium-doped fluorapatite glass-ceramics.

Authors:  Meenakshi Kushwaha; Xueliang Pan; Julie A Holloway; Isabelle L Denry
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.304

Review 3.  Strategies for controlled delivery of growth factors and cells for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Tiffany N Vo; F Kurtis Kasper; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 15.470

4.  Optimally porous and biomechanically compatible scaffolds for large-area bone regeneration.

Authors:  Ami R Amini; Douglas J Adams; Cato T Laurencin; Syam P Nukavarapu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 5.  [Bridging posttraumatic bony defects. Established and new methods].

Authors:  M Schieker; W Mutschler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  Effect of multiple unconfined compression on cellular dense collagen scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Malak Bitar; Vehid Salih; Robert A Brown; Showan N Nazhat
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Mineralized collagen scaffolds induce hMSC osteogenesis and matrix remodeling.

Authors:  Daniel W Weisgerber; Steven R Caliari; Brendan A C Harley
Journal:  Biomater Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 6.843

8.  POLYMERIC BIOMATERIALS FOR SCAFFOLD-BASED BONE REGENERATIVE ENGINEERING.

Authors:  Kenneth S Ogueri; Tahereh Jafari; Jorge L Escobar Ivirico; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Regen Eng Transl Med       Date:  2018-07-20

9.  Non-destructive evaluation of mechanical properties of poly (vinyl) alcohol-hydroxyapatite nanocomposites.

Authors:  Suprabha Nayar; Sharmistha P Sagar; Avijit Guha
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 10.  Biomaterials for Bone Regenerative Engineering.

Authors:  Xiaohua Yu; Xiaoyan Tang; Shalini V Gohil; Cato T Laurencin
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 9.933

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.