Literature DB >> 23685899

Dedicated breast CT: geometric design considerations to maximize posterior breast coverage.

Srinivasan Vedantham1, Andrew Karellas, Margaret M Emmons, Lawrence J Moss, Sarwat Hussain, Stephen P Baker.   

Abstract

An Institutional Review Board-approved protocol was used to quantify breast tissue inclusion in 52 women, under conditions simulating both craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views in mammography, dedicated breast CT in the upright subject position, and dedicated breast CT in the prone subject position. Using skin as a surrogate for the underlying breast tissue, the posterior aspect of the breast that is aligned with the chest-wall edge of the breast support in a screen-film mammography system was marked with the study participants positioned for CC and MLO views. The union of skin marks with the study participants positioned for CC and MLO views was considered to represent chest-wall tissue available for imaging with mammography and served as the reference standard. For breast CT, a prone stereotactic breast biopsy unit and a custom-fabricated barrier were used to simulate conditions during prone and upright breast CT, respectively. For the same breast marked on the mammography system, skin marks were made along the breast periphery that was just anterior to the apertures of the prone biopsy unit and the upright barrier. The differences in skin marks between subject positioning simulating breast CT (prone, upright) and mammography were quantified at six anatomic locations. For each location, at least one study participant had a skin mark from breast CT (prone, upright) posterior to mammography. However for all study participants, there was at least one anatomic location where the skin mark from mammography was posterior to that from breast CT (prone, upright) positioning. The maximum amount by which the skin mark from mammography was posterior to breast CT (prone and upright) over all six locations was quantified for each study participant and pair-wise comparison did not exhibit statistically significant difference between prone and upright breast CT (paired t- test, p = 0.4). Quantitatively, for 95% of the study participants the skin mark from mammography was posterior to breast CT (prone or upright) by at the most 9 mm over all six locations. Based on the study observations, geometric design considerations targeting chest-wall coverage with breast CT equivalent to mammography, wherein part of the x-ray beam images through the swale during breast CT are provided. Assuming subjects can extend their chest in to a swale, the optimal swale-depth required to achieve equivalent coverage with breast CT images as mammograms for 95% of the subjects varies in the range of ~30-50 mm for clinical prototypes and was dependent on the system geometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23685899      PMCID: PMC3711264          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/12/4099

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  28 in total

1.  Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation.

Authors:  J M Boone; T R Nelson; K K Lindfors; J A Seibert
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Breast tomography with synchrotron radiation: preliminary results.

Authors:  Silvia Pani; Renata Longo; Diego Dreossi; Francesco Montanari; Alessandro Olivo; Fulvia Arfelli; Anna Bergamaschi; Paolo Poropat; Luigi Rigon; Fabrizio Zanconati; Ludovico Dalla Palma; Edoardo Castelli
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Normalized glandular dose (DgN) coefficients for flat-panel CT breast imaging.

Authors:  Samta C Thacker; Stephen J Glick
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-12-21       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Quality control for digital mammography in the ACRIN DMIST trial: part I.

Authors:  Aili K Bloomquist; Martin J Yaffe; Etta D Pisano; R Edward Hendrick; Gordon E Mawdsley; Stewart Bright; Sam Z Shen; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Edward L Nickoloff; Richard C Fleischman; Mark B Williams; Andrew D A Maidment; Daniel J Beideck; Joseph Och; J A Seibert
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Cone-beam mammo-computed tomography from data along two tilting arcs.

Authors:  Kai Zeng; Hengyong Yu; Laurie L Fajardo; Ge Wang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Performance of dedicated emission mammotomography for various breast shapes and sizes.

Authors:  C N Brzymialkiewicz; M P Tornai; R L McKinley; S J Cutler; J E Bowsher
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-09-19       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  High resolution CT mammography of surgical biopsy specimens.

Authors:  V Raptopoulos; J K Baum; M Hochman; A Karellas; M J Houlihan; C J D'Orsi
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Specific value of computed tomographic breast scanner (CT/M) in diagnosis of breast diseases.

Authors:  C H Chang; J L Sibala; S L Fritz; S J Dwyer; A W Templeton
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Computed tomography of breast lesions: comparison with x-ray mammography.

Authors:  J W Muller; P F van Waes; P R Koehler
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  Technical note: Skin thickness measurements using high-resolution flat-panel cone-beam dedicated breast CT.

Authors:  Linxi Shi; Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Avice M O'Connell
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Newer Technologies in Breast Cancer Imaging: Dedicated Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Avice M O'Connell; Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham; Daniel T Kawakyu-O'Connor
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 1.875

Review 2.  Ultrasound Imaging Technologies for Breast Cancer Detection and Management: A Review.

Authors:  Rongrong Guo; Guolan Lu; Binjie Qin; Baowei Fei
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Radiochromic film dosimetry in synchrotron radiation breast computed tomography: a phantom study.

Authors:  Giovanni Mettivier; Marica Masi; Fulvia Arfelli; Luca Brombal; Pasquale Delogu; Francesca Di Lillo; Sandro Donato; Christian Fedon; Bruno Golosio; Piernicola Oliva; Luigi Rigon; Antonio Sarno; Angelo Taibi; Paolo Russo
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.616

4.  Breast Cancer Screening: Opportunities and Challenges with Fully 3D Tomographic X-Ray Imaging.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Bridge (Wash D C)       Date:  2022-03-28

5.  Personalized estimates of radiation dose from dedicated breast CT in a diagnostic population and comparison with diagnostic mammography.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Linxi Shi; Andrew Karellas; Avice M O'Connell; David L Conover
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  The potential role of dedicated 3D breast CT as a diagnostic tool: review and early clinical examples.

Authors:  Avice M O'Connell; Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 2.431

7.  Dedicated cone-beam breast CT using laterally-shifted detector geometry: Quantitative analysis of feasibility for clinical translation.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Hsin-Wu Tseng; Souleymane Konate; Linxi Shi; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  J Xray Sci Technol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 1.535

8.  Sparse-view, short-scan, dedicated cone-beam breast computed tomography: image quality assessment.

Authors:  Hsin Wu Tseng; Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2020-09-28

Review 9.  Dedicated breast CT: state of the art-Part I. Historical evolution and technical aspects.

Authors:  Yueqiang Zhu; Avice M O'Connell; Yue Ma; Aidi Liu; Haijie Li; Yuwei Zhang; Xiaohua Zhang; Zhaoxiang Ye
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 7.034

10.  Radiation dosimetry of a clinical prototype dedicated cone-beam breast CT system with offset detector.

Authors:  Hsin Wu Tseng; Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 4.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.