Literature DB >> 31259201

Evaluation of non-Gaussian statistical properties in virtual breast phantoms.

Craig K Abbey1, Predrag R Bakic2, David D Pokrajac3, Andrew D A Maidment2, Miguel P Eckstein1, John M Boone4.   

Abstract

Images derived from a "virtual phantom" can be useful in characterizing the performance of imaging systems. This has driven the development of virtual breast phantoms implemented in simulation environments. In breast imaging, several such phantoms have been proposed. We analyze the non-Gaussian statistical properties from three classes of virtual breast phantoms and compare them to similar statistics from a database of breast images. These include clustered-blob lumpy backgrounds (CBLBs), truncated binary textures, and the UPenn virtual breast phantoms. We use Laplacian fractional entropy (LFE) as a measure of the non-Gaussian statistical properties of each simulation procedure. Our results show that, despite similar power spectra, the simulation approaches differ considerably in LFE with very low scores for the CBLB to high values for the UPenn phantom at certain frequencies. These results suggest that LFE may have value in developing and tuning virtual phantom simulation procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laplacian fractional entropy; breast phantoms; image statistics; natural scene statistics

Year:  2019        PMID: 31259201      PMCID: PMC6566002          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.6.2.025502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  27 in total

1.  On the statistical nature of mammograms.

Authors:  J J Heine; S R Deans; R P Velthuizen; L P Clarke
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Receptive field structure of neurons in monkey primary visual cortex revealed by stimulation with natural image sequences.

Authors:  Dario L Ringach; Michael J Hawken; Robert Shapley
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Mammogram synthesis using a 3D simulation. I. Breast tissue model and image acquisition simulation.

Authors:  Predrag R Bakic; Michael Albert; Dragana Brzakovic; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Effect of random background inhomogeneity on observer detection performance.

Authors:  J P Rolland; H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics.

Authors:  Hamid Rahim Sheikh; Alan Conrad Bovik; Gustavo de Veciana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 10.856

Review 6.  Diagnostic imaging over the last 50 years: research and development in medical imaging science and technology.

Authors:  Kunio Doi
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  A computer simulation study comparing lesion detection accuracy with digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, and cone-beam CT breast imaging.

Authors:  Xing Gong; Stephen J Glick; Bob Liu; Aruna A Vedula; Samta Thacker
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise.

Authors:  A E Burgess; F L Jacobson; P F Judy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Mammographic texture synthesis: second-generation clustered lumpy backgrounds using a genetic algorithm.

Authors:  Cyril Castella; Karen Kinkel; François Descombes; Miguel P Eckstein; Pierre-Edouard Sottas; Francis R Verdun; François O Bochud
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2008-05-26       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Characterizing anatomical variability in breast CT images.

Authors:  Kathrine G Metheany; Craig K Abbey; Nathan Packard; John M Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  1 in total

1.  Computational Breast Anatomy Simulation Using Multi-Scale Perlin Noise.

Authors:  Bruno Barufaldi; Craig K Abbey; Miguel A Lago; Trevor L Vent; Raymond J Acciavatti; Predrag R Bakic; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 10.048

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.