Literature DB >> 2341666

Middle-ear response in the chinchilla and its relationship to mechanics at the base of the cochlea.

M A Ruggero1, N C Rich, L Robles, B G Shivapuja.   

Abstract

The responses of the malleus and the stapes to sinusoidal acoustic stimulation have been measured in the middle ears of anesthetized chinchillas using the Mössbauer technique. With "intact" bullas (i.e., closed except for venting via capillary tubing), the vibrations of the tip of the malleus reach a maximal peak velocity of about 2 mm/s in responses to 100-dB SPL tones in the frequency range 500-6000 Hz; vibration velocity diminishes toward lower frequencies with a slope of about 6 dB/oct. Opening the bulla widely increases the responses to low-frequency stimuli by as much as 16 dB. At low frequencies, malleus response sensitivity with either open or intact bullas far exceeds all previous measurements in cats and matches or exceeds such measurements in guinea pigs. Whether measured in open or intact bullas, phase-versus-frequency curves closely approximate those predicted from the magnitude-versus-frequency curves by minimum phase theory. The stapes responses are similar to those of the malleus, except that stapes response magnitude is lower, on the average, by 7.5 dB at frequencies below 2 kHz and 10.7 dB at 2 kHz and above. Comparison of the responses of the middle ear with those of the basilar membrane at a site 3.5 mm from the stapes indicates that, at frequencies below 150 Hz, the basilar membrane displacement is proportional to stapes acceleration. At frequencies between 150 and 2000 Hz, basilar membrane displacement is proportional to stapes velocity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2341666      PMCID: PMC3580955          DOI: 10.1121/1.399409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  44 in total

1.  Some observations on cochlear mechanics.

Authors:  W S Rhode
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A parametric study of cochlear input impedance.

Authors:  S Puria; J B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Some properties of sound transmission in the middle and outer ears of cats.

Authors:  J Tonndorf; S M Khanna
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1967-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. II. Responses to low-frequency tones and relationship to microphonics and spike initiation in the VIII nerve.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; L Robles; N C Rich
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. I. Input-output functions, tuning curves, and response phases.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero; N C Rich
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  The peripheral auditory apparatus.

Authors:  B M Johnstone; P M Sellick
Journal:  Q Rev Biophys       Date:  1972-02       Impact factor: 5.318

7.  Middle-ear function in the guinea pig.

Authors:  G A Manley; B M Johnstone
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Middle-ear function in a monotreme: the Echidna (Tachyglossus aculeatus).

Authors:  L M Aitkin; B M Johnstone
Journal:  J Exp Zool       Date:  1972-05

9.  Structural implications of basilar membrane compliance measurements.

Authors:  C E Miller
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Laser--Doppler velocity meter applied to tympanic membrane vibrations in cat.

Authors:  T J Buunen; M S Vlaming
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  46 in total

1.  Mechanical bases of frequency tuning and neural excitation at the base of the cochlea: comparison of basilar-membrane vibrations and auditory-nerve-fiber responses in chinchilla.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; S S Narayan; A N Temchin; A Recio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  The roles of the external, middle, and inner ears in determining the bandwidth of hearing.

Authors:  Mario A Ruggero; Andrei N Temchin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-18       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Responses to sound of the basilar membrane of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  M A Ruggero
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 6.627

5.  The effect of superior canal dehiscence on cochlear potential in response to air-conducted stimuli in chinchilla.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Songer; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Structures that contribute to middle-ear admittance in chinchilla.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Michael E Ravicz; Jocelyn E Songer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Wiener kernels of chinchilla auditory-nerve fibers: verification using responses to tones, clicks, and noise and comparison with basilar-membrane vibrations.

Authors:  Andrei N Temchin; Alberto Recio-Spinoso; Pim van Dijk; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-01-19       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The effect of superior-canal opening on middle-ear input admittance and air-conducted stapes velocity in chinchilla.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Songer; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Transmission matrix analysis of the chinchilla middle ear.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Songer; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Chinchilla middle-ear admittance and sound power: high-frequency estimates and effects of inner-ear modifications.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.