Literature DB >> 3782616

Basilar membrane mechanics at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. II. Responses to low-frequency tones and relationship to microphonics and spike initiation in the VIII nerve.

M A Ruggero, L Robles, N C Rich.   

Abstract

Low-frequency stimuli (40- to 1000-Hz tones) have been used to correlate the motion of the 8-to 9-kHz place of the chinchilla basilar membrane with the cochlear microphonics recorded at the round window and with the responses of auditory nerve fibers with appropriate characteristic frequency. At the lowest stimulus frequencies, maximum displacement of the basilar membrane toward scala tympani occurs in near synchrony with maximum rarefaction at the eardrum and maximum negativity at the round window; at higher frequencies, the mechanical and microphonic response phases progressively lag rarefaction, reaching - 240 deg at 1000 Hz. At most frequencies (40-1000 Hz) near-threshold neural responses, once corrected for neural travel-time and synaptic delays, somewhat lead (by some 40 deg) maximal scala tympani displacement and maximal negativity of the round window microphonics. The variation of sensitivity with frequency is similar for basilar membrane displacement and microphonic responses: Under open-bulla conditions, sensitivity is constant for frequencies between 100 and 1000 Hz; below 100 Hz, sensitivity decreases at rates close to 12 dB/oct toward lower frequencies. Neural response sensitivity matches BM displacement more closely than BM velocity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3782616     DOI: 10.1121/1.394390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  16 in total

1.  Mechanical bases of frequency tuning and neural excitation at the base of the cochlea: comparison of basilar-membrane vibrations and auditory-nerve-fiber responses in chinchilla.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; S S Narayan; A N Temchin; A Recio
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Mechanics of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  L Robles; M A Ruggero
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Temporal integration of sound pressure determines thresholds of auditory-nerve fibers.

Authors:  P Heil; H Neubauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Longitudinal pattern of basilar membrane vibration in the sensitive cochlea.

Authors:  Tianying Ren
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-12-02       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Application of a commercially-manufactured Doppler-shift laser velocimeter to the measurement of basilar-membrane vibration.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; N C Rich
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Estimating the operating point of the cochlear transducer using low-frequency biased distortion products.

Authors:  Daniel J Brown; Jared J Hartsock; Ruth M Gill; Hillary E Fitzgerald; Alec N Salt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Nonlinear feedback models for the tuning of auditory nerve fibers.

Authors:  L H Carney; M Friedman
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Cochlear electrically evoked emissions modulated by mechanical transduction channels.

Authors:  G K Yates; D L Kirk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Relationship Between Behavioral and Stimulus Frequency Otoacoustic Emissions Delay-Based Tuning Estimates.

Authors:  Uzma Shaheen Wilson; Jenna Browning-Kamins; Sriram Boothalingam; Arturo Moleti; Renata Sisto; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Middle-ear response in the chinchilla and its relationship to mechanics at the base of the cochlea.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; N C Rich; L Robles; B G Shivapuja
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.