Literature DB >> 23039439

Chinchilla middle-ear admittance and sound power: high-frequency estimates and effects of inner-ear modifications.

Michael E Ravicz1, John J Rosowski.   

Abstract

The middle-ear input admittance relates sound power into the middle ear (ME) and sound pressure at the tympanic membrane (TM). ME input admittance was measured in the chinchilla ear canal as part of a larger study of sound power transmission through the ME into the inner ear. The middle ear was open, and the inner ear was intact or modified with small sensors inserted into the vestibule near the cochlear base. A simple model of the chinchilla ear canal, based on ear canal sound pressure measurements at two points along the canal and an assumption of plane-wave propagation, enables reliable estimates of Y(TM,) the ME input admittance at the TM, from the admittance measured relatively far from the TM. Y(TM) appears valid at frequencies as high as 17 kHz, a much higher frequency than previously reported. The real part of Y(TM) decreases with frequency above 2 kHz. Effects of the inner-ear sensors (necessary for inner ear power computation) were small and generally limited to frequencies below 3 kHz. Computed power reflectance was ~0.1 below 3.5 kHz, lower than with an intact ME below 2.5 kHz, and nearly 1 above 16 kHz.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23039439      PMCID: PMC3477186          DOI: 10.1121/1.4750487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  33 in total

1.  Methods for estimating the sound pressure at the eardrum.

Authors:  H Hudde; A Engel; A Lodwig
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The effects of experimentally induced conductive hearing loss on spectral and temporal aspects of sound transmission through the ear.

Authors:  J Eric Lupo; Kanthaiah Koka; Jennifer L Thornton; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Structures that contribute to middle-ear admittance in chinchilla.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Michael E Ravicz; Jocelyn E Songer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Sound pressure distribution and power flow within the gerbil ear canal from 100 Hz to 80 kHz.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Elizabeth S Olson; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  An in situ calibration for hearing thresholds.

Authors:  Robert H Withnell; Patricia S Jeng; Kelly Waldvogel; Kari Morgenstein; Jont B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Comparison of in-situ calibration methods for quantifying input to the middle ear.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Ryan W McCreery; Stephen T Neely; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Postnatal development of cochlear microphonic and compound action potentials in a precocious species, Chinchilla lanigera.

Authors:  Heath G Jones; Kanthaiah Koka; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Otoreflectance of the cochlea and middle ear.

Authors:  D H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Three-dimensional acoustic waves in the ear canal and their interaction with the tympanic membrane.

Authors:  R D Rabbitt; M H Holmes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Measurement of the acoustic input immittance of the human ear.

Authors:  W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  8 in total

1.  Middle-ear velocity transfer function, cochlear input immittance, and middle-ear efficiency in chinchilla.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Sound pressure distribution within natural and artificial human ear canals: forward stimulation.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Jeffrey Tao Cheng; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Chinchilla middle ear transmission matrix model and middle-ear flexibility.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Inner-ear sound pressures near the base of the cochlea in chinchilla: further investigation.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A lumped-element model of the chinchilla middle ear.

Authors:  Peter Bowers; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Stapes Vibration in the Chinchilla Middle Ear: Relation to Behavioral and Auditory-Nerve Thresholds.

Authors:  Luis Robles; Andrei N Temchin; Yun-Hui Fan; Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2015-06-12

7.  Mouse middle-ear forward and reverse acoustics.

Authors:  Hamid Motallebzadeh; Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The onset of nonlinear growth of middle-ear responses to high intensity sounds.

Authors:  Jeffrey Tao Cheng; Iman Ghanad; Aaron Remenschneider; John Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.672

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.