Literature DB >> 16150562

The effect of superior canal dehiscence on cochlear potential in response to air-conducted stimuli in chinchilla.

Jocelyn E Songer1, John J Rosowski.   

Abstract

A superior semicircular canal dehiscence (SCD) is a break or hole in the bony wall of the superior semicircular canal. Patients with SCD syndrome present with a variety of symptoms: some with vestibular symptoms, others with auditory symptoms (including low-frequency conductive hearing loss) and yet others with both. We are interested in whether or not mechanically altering the superior canal by introducing a dehiscence is sufficient to cause the low-frequency conductive hearing loss associated with SCD syndrome. We evaluated the effect of a surgically introduced dehiscence on auditory responses to air-conducted (AC) stimuli in 11 chinchilla ears. Cochlear potential (CP) was recorded at the round-window before and after a dehiscence was introduced. In each ear, a decrease in CP in response to low frequency (<2 kHz) sound stimuli was observed after the introduction of the dehiscence. The dehiscence was then patched with cyanoacrylate glue leading to a reversal of the dehiscence-induced changes in CP. The reversible decrease in auditory sensitivity observed in chinchilla is consistent with the elevated AC thresholds observed in patients with SCD. According to the 'third-window' hypothesis the SCD shunts sound-induced stapes velocity away from the cochlea, resulting in decreased auditory sensitivity to AC sounds. The data collected in this study are consistent with predictions of this hypothesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16150562      PMCID: PMC1513126          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2005.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  16 in total

1.  Acoustic mechanisms that determine the ear-canal sound pressures generated by earphones.

Authors:  S E Voss; J J Rosowski; C A Shera; W T Peake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Superior canal dehiscence: mechanisms of pressure sensitivity in a chinchilla model.

Authors:  T P Hirvonen; J P Carey; C J Liang; L B Minor
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2001-11

3.  Middle ear pathology can affect the ear-canal sound pressure generated by audiologic earphones.

Authors:  S E Voss; J J Rosowski; S N Merchant; A R Thornton; C A Shera; W T Peake
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Symptoms, findings and treatment in patients with dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal.

Authors:  K Brantberg; J Bergenius; L Mendel; H Witt; A Tribukait; J Ygge
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Superior canal dehiscence syndrome.

Authors:  L B Minor
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  2000-01

6.  Dehiscence of bone overlying the superior canal as a cause of apparent conductive hearing loss.

Authors:  Lloyd B Minor; John P Carey; Phillip D Cremer; Lawrence R Lustig; Sven-Olrik Streubel; Michael J Ruckenstein
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Eye movements in patients with superior canal dehiscence syndrome align with the abnormal canal.

Authors:  P D Cremer; L B Minor; J P Carey; C C Della Santina
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2000-12-26       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Sound- and/or pressure-induced vertigo due to bone dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal.

Authors:  L B Minor; D Solomon; J S Zinreich; D S Zee
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1998-03

9.  Superior semicircular canal dehiscence presenting as conductive hearing loss without vertigo.

Authors:  Anthony A Mikulec; Michael J McKenna; Mitchell J Ramsey; John J Rosowski; Barbara S Herrmann; Steven D Rauch; Hugh D Curtin; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Semicircular canal fenestration - improvement of bone- but not air-conducted auditory thresholds.

Authors:  Haim Sohmer; Sharon Freeman; Ronen Perez
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.208

View more
  27 in total

1.  Structures that contribute to middle-ear admittance in chinchilla.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Michael E Ravicz; Jocelyn E Songer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  The effect of superior-canal opening on middle-ear input admittance and air-conducted stapes velocity in chinchilla.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Songer; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Measurements of human middle- and inner-ear mechanics with dehiscence of the superior semicircular canal.

Authors:  Wade Chien; Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  A mechano-acoustic model of the effect of superior canal dehiscence on hearing in chinchilla.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Songer; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Transmission matrix analysis of the chinchilla middle ear.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Songer; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Conductive hearing loss caused by third-window lesions of the inner ear.

Authors:  Saumil N Merchant; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 7.  Characteristics and management of superior semicircular canal dehiscence.

Authors:  Andrew Yew; Golmah Zarinkhou; Marko Spasic; Andy Trang; Quinton Gopen; Isaac Yang
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2012-08-08

8.  Semicircular canal dehiscence in HR multislice computed tomography: distribution, frequency, and clinical relevance.

Authors:  H Stimmer; K F Hamann; S Zeiter; A Naumann; E J Rummeny
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-07-08       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 9.  How does high-frequency sound or vibration activate vestibular receptors?

Authors:  I S Curthoys; J W Grant
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Differentiating Middle Ear and Medial Olivocochlear Effects on Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  Kendra L Marks; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-04-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.