Literature DB >> 17672642

Transmission matrix analysis of the chinchilla middle ear.

Jocelyn E Songer1, John J Rosowski.   

Abstract

Despite the common use of the chinchilla as an animal model in auditory research, a complete characterization of the chinchilla middle ear using transmission matrix analysis has not been performed. In this paper we describe measurements of middle-ear input admittance and stapes velocity in ears with the middle-ear cavity opened under three conditions: intact tympano-ossicular system and cochlea, after the cochlea has been drained, and after the stapes has been fixed. These measurements, made with stimulus frequencies of 100-8000 Hz, are used to define the transmission matrix parameters of the middle ear and to calculate the cochlear input impedance as well as the middle-ear output impedance. This transmission characterization of the chinchilla middle ear will be useful for modeling auditory sensitivity in the normal and pathological chinchilla ear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17672642      PMCID: PMC2262148          DOI: 10.1121/1.2747157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  28 in total

1.  Acoustic responses of the human middle ear.

Authors:  S E Voss; J J Rosowski; S N Merchant; W T Peake
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE ACOUSTIC IMPEDANCE OF THE MIDDLE EAR AND ITS TRANSMISSION PROPERTIES.

Authors:  A R MOLLER
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1965 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.494

3.  The effect of superior canal dehiscence on cochlear potential in response to air-conducted stimuli in chinchilla.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Songer; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  Structures that contribute to middle-ear admittance in chinchilla.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Michael E Ravicz; Jocelyn E Songer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Simultaneous measurement of middle-ear input impedance and forward/reverse transmission in cat.

Authors:  Susan E Voss; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The effect of superior-canal opening on middle-ear input admittance and air-conducted stapes velocity in chinchilla.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Songer; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  A mechano-acoustic model of the effect of superior canal dehiscence on hearing in chinchilla.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Songer; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The effect of methodological differences in the measurement of stapes motion in live and cadaver ears.

Authors:  Wade Chien; Michael E Ravicz; Saumil N Merchant; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 1.854

9.  A human temporal bone study of stapes footplate movement.

Authors:  K E Heiland; R L Goode; M Asai; A M Huber
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1999-01

10.  Measurements and model of the cat middle ear: evidence of tympanic membrane acoustic delay.

Authors:  S Puria; J B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  14 in total

1.  Coherent reflection without traveling waves: on the origin of long-latency otoacoustic emissions in lizards.

Authors:  Christopher Bergevin; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  A mechano-acoustic model of the effect of superior canal dehiscence on hearing in chinchilla.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Songer; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Testing coherent reflection in chinchilla: Auditory-nerve responses predict stimulus-frequency emissions.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Arnold Tubis; Carrick L Talmadge
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Obtaining reliable phase-gradient delays from otoacoustic emission data.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Christopher Bergevin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Chinchilla middle ear transmission matrix model and middle-ear flexibility.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Estimation of Round-Trip Outer-Middle Ear Gain Using DPOAEs.

Authors:  Maryam Naghibolhosseini; Glenis R Long
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-10-28

7.  Basilar-membrane interference patterns from multiple internal reflection of cochlear traveling waves.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; Nigel P Cooper
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Otoacoustic estimation of cochlear tuning: validation in the chinchilla.

Authors:  Christopher A Shera; John J Guinan; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2010-05-04

9.  Frequency selectivity in Old-World monkeys corroborates sharp cochlear tuning in humans.

Authors:  Philip X Joris; Christopher Bergevin; Radha Kalluri; Myles Mc Laughlin; Pascal Michelet; Marcel van der Heijden; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-10       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Chinchilla middle-ear admittance and sound power: high-frequency estimates and effects of inner-ear modifications.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.