Literature DB >> 2002170

A parametric study of cochlear input impedance.

S Puria1, J B Allen.   

Abstract

In this paper various aspects of the cat cochlear input impedance Zc (omega) are implemented using a transmission line model having perilymph viscosity and a varying cross-sectional scalae area. These model results are then compared to the experimental results of Lynch et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72, 108-130 (1982)]. From the model, the following observations are made about the cochlear input impedance: (a) Scalae area variations significantly alter the model Zc (omega); (b) the use of anatomically measured area improves the fits to the experimental data; (c) improved agreement between model and experimental phase is obtained when perilymph viscosity and tapering are included in the cochlear model for frequencies below approximately 150 Hz; (d) when model scalae tapering and perilymph viscosity are chosen to match physiological conditions, the effect of the helicotrema impedance on Zc (omega) is insignificant; and (e) the cochlear map, which is defined as the position of the basilar membrane peak displacement as a function of stimulus frequency, can have an important effect on Zc (omega) for frequencies below 500 Hz. A nonphysiological cochlear map can give rise to cochlear standing waves, which result in oscillations in Zc (omega). Scalae tapering and perilymph viscosity contribute significantly to the damping of these standing waves. These observations should dispel the previous notion that Zc (omega) is determined solely by parameters of the cochlea close to the stapes, and the notion that Zc (omega) is dominated by the helicotrema at low frequencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2002170     DOI: 10.1121/1.400675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  Alterations of bone conducted hearing in cases of modified middle ear mechanics. Conclusions from an electrical model.

Authors:  F Schick
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Outer hair cell somatic electromotility in vivo and power transfer to the organ of Corti.

Authors:  Sripriya Ramamoorthy; Alfred L Nuttall
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-02-07       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Transmission matrix analysis of the chinchilla middle ear.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Songer; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Displacements of the organ of Corti by gel injections into the cochlear apex.

Authors:  Alec N Salt; Daniel J Brown; Jared J Hartsock; Stefan K Plontke
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Simultaneous measurements of ossicular velocity and intracochlear pressure leading to the cochlear input impedance in gerbil.

Authors:  O de la Rochefoucauld; W F Decraemer; S M Khanna; E S Olson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-05-06

6.  Inertial bone conduction: symmetric and anti-symmetric components.

Authors:  Namkeun Kim; Kenji Homma; Sunil Puria
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-01

7.  Infrasound transmission in the human ear: Implications for acoustic and vestibular responses of the normal and dehiscent inner ear.

Authors:  Stefan Raufer; Salwa F Masud; Hideko H Nakajima
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Inner-ear sound pressures near the base of the cochlea in chinchilla: further investigation.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Middle-ear response in the chinchilla and its relationship to mechanics at the base of the cochlea.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; N C Rich; L Robles; B G Shivapuja
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 10.  Limits on normal cochlear 'third' windows provided by previous investigations of additional sound paths into and out of the cat inner ear.

Authors:  John J Rosowski; Peter Bowers; Hideko H Nakajima
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 3.208

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.