Literature DB >> 23402843

Nonlinear characterization of breast cancer using multi-compression 3D ultrasound elastography in vivo.

Ahmed Sayed1, Ginger Layne, Jame Abraham, Osama Mukdadi.   

Abstract

The main objective of this article is to introduce a new nonlinear elastography based classification method for human breast masses. Multi-compression elastography imaging is elucidated in this study to differentiate malignant from benign lesions, based on their nonlinear mechanical behavior under compression. Three classification parameters were used and compared in this work: a new nonlinear parameter based on a power-law behavior of the strain difference between breast masses and healthy tissues, mass-soft tissue strain ratio and the mass relative volume between B-mode and elastography imaging. Using 3D elastography, these parameters were tested in vivo. A pilot study on 10 patients was performed, and results were compared with biopsy diagnosis as a gold standard. Initial elastography results showed a good agreement with biopsy outcomes. The new estimated nonlinear parameter had an average value of 0.163±0.063 and 1.642±0.261 for benign and malignant masses, respectively. Strain ratio values for the benign and malignant masses had an average value of 2.135±0.707 and 4.21±2.108, respectively. Relative mass volume was 0.848±0.237 and 2.18±0.522 for benign and malignant masses. In addition to the traditional normal axial strain, new strain types were used for elastography and constructed in 3D, including the first principal, maximum shear and Von Mises strains. The new strains provided an enhanced distinction of the stiff lesion from the soft tissue. In summary, the proposed elastographic techniques can be used as a noninvasive quantitative characterization tool for breast cancer, with the capability of visualizing and separating the masses in a three dimensional space. This may reduce the number of unnecessary painful breast biopsies. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23402843      PMCID: PMC3624066          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2013.01.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  46 in total

1.  A freehand elastographic imaging approach for clinical breast imaging: system development and performance evaluation.

Authors:  M M Doyley; J C Bamber; F Fuechsel; N L Bush
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Analysis of shear strain imaging for classifying breast masses: finite element and phantom results.

Authors:  Haiyan Xu; Tomy Varghese; Ernest L Madsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Resolution of axial shear strain elastography.

Authors:  Arun Thitaikumar; Raffaella Righetti; Thomas A Krouskop; Jonathan Ophir
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Timothy J Hall; Amy M Sommer; Gina K Hesley; Gale A Sisney; William E Svensson; Jason P Fine; Jinfeng Jiang; Nicholas J Hangiandreou
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  A new elastographic method for estimation and imaging of lateral displacements, lateral strains, corrected axial strains and Poisson's ratios in tissues.

Authors:  E Konofagou; J Ophir
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Fundamental limitations on the contrast-transfer efficiency in elastography: an analytic study.

Authors:  F Kallel; M Bertrand; J Ophir
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Axial-shear strain imaging for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses.

Authors:  Haiyan Xu; Min Rao; Tomy Varghese; Amy Sommer; Sara Baker; Timothy J Hall; Gale A Sisney; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Linear and nonlinear elasticity imaging of soft tissue in vivo: demonstration of feasibility.

Authors:  Assad A Oberai; Nachiket H Gokhale; Sevan Goenezen; Paul E Barbone; Timothy J Hall; Amy M Sommer; Jingfeng Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  A microscale model for prediction of breast cancer cell damage during cryosurgery.

Authors:  Aili Zhang; Lisa X Xu; George A Sandison; Jiayao Zhang
Journal:  Cryobiology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.487

10.  A new nonlinear parameter in the developed strain-to-applied strain of the soft tissues and its application in ultrasound elasticity imaging.

Authors:  Jingping Xu; Sakya Tripathy; Jonathan M Rubin; Ryan W Stidham; Laura A Johnson; Peter D R Higgins; Kang Kim
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-01-21       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  8 in total

1.  Five-dimensional ultrasound system for soft tissue visualization.

Authors:  Nishikant P Deshmukh; Jesus J Caban; Russell H Taylor; Gregory D Hager; Emad M Boctor
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Difference-Frequency Ultrasound Imaging With Non-Linear Contrast.

Authors:  Yilei Li; Dina Polyak; Eli Johnson; Derek Yecies; Saba Shevidi; Adam de la Zerda; Melanie Hayden Gephart; Steven Chu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Nonlinear Elasticity Assessment with Optical Coherence Elastography for High-Selectivity Differentiation of Breast Cancer Tissues.

Authors:  Ekaterina V Gubarkova; Aleksander A Sovetsky; Lev A Matveev; Aleksander L Matveyev; Dmitry A Vorontsov; Anton A Plekhanov; Sergey S Kuznetsov; Sergey V Gamayunov; Alexey Y Vorontsov; Marina A Sirotkina; Natalia D Gladkova; Vladimir Y Zaitsev
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Large-Strain 3-D in Vivo Breast Ultrasound Strain Elastography Using a Multi-compression Strategy and a Whole-Breast Scanning System.

Authors:  Yuqi Wang; Matthew Bayer; Jingfeng Jiang; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  An analysis of the segmentation threshold used in axial-shear strain elastography.

Authors:  Arun K Thittai; Rongmin Xia
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 2.890

6.  Application of Acoustoelasticity to Evaluate Nonlinear Modulus in Ex Vivo Kidneys.

Authors:  Sara Aristizabal; Carolina Amador Carrascal; Ivan Z Nenadic; James F Greenleaf; Matthew W Urban
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  3-D H-Scan Ultrasound Imaging and Use of a Convolutional Neural Network for Scatterer Size Estimation.

Authors:  Haowei Tai; Mawia Khairalseed; Kenneth Hoyt
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  Diagnostic value of a spiral breast computed tomography system equipped with photon counting detector technology in patients with implants: An observational study of our initial experiences.

Authors:  Lisa Ruby; Sojin Shim; Nicole Berger; Magda Marcon; Thomas Frauenfelder; Andreas Boss
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.