Literature DB >> 20800948

Axial-shear strain imaging for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses.

Haiyan Xu1, Min Rao, Tomy Varghese, Amy Sommer, Sara Baker, Timothy J Hall, Gale A Sisney, Elizabeth S Burnside.   

Abstract

Axial strain imaging has been utilized for the characterization of breast masses for over a decade; however, another important feature namely the shear strain distribution around breast masses has only recently been used. In this article, we examine the feasibility of utilizing in vivo axial-shear strain imaging for differentiating benign from malignant breast masses. Radio-frequency data was acquired using a VFX 13-5 linear array transducer on 41 patients using a Siemens SONOLINE Antares real-time clinical scanner at the University of Wisconsin Breast Cancer Center. Free-hand palpation using deformations of up to 10% was utilized to generate axial strain and axial-shear strain images using a two-dimensional cross-correlation algorithm from the radio-frequency data loops. Axial-shear strain areas normalized to the lesion size, applied strain and lesion strain contrast was utilized as a feature for differentiating benign from malignant masses. The normalized axial-shear strain area feature estimated on eight patients with malignant tumors and 33 patients with fibroadenomas was utilized to demonstrate its potential for lesion differentiation. Biopsy results were considered the diagnostic standard for comparison. Our results indicate that the normalized axial-shear strain area is significantly larger for malignant tumors compared with benign masses such as fibroadenomas. Axial-shear strain pixel values greater than a specified threshold, including only those with correlation coefficient values greater than 0.75, were overlaid on the corresponding B-mode image to aid in diagnosis. A scatter plot of the normalized area feature demonstrates the feasibility of developing a linear classifier to differentiate benign from malignant masses. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve utilizing the normalized axial-shear strain area feature was 0.996, demonstrating the potential of this feature to noninvasively differentiate between benign and malignant breast masses.
Copyright © 2010 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20800948      PMCID: PMC3033738          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.07.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  49 in total

Review 1.  Elastography: ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues.

Authors:  J Ophir; S K Alam; B Garra; F Kallel; E Konofagou; T Krouskop; T Varghese
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.617

2.  Estimation of displacement vectors and strain tensors in elastography using angular insonifications.

Authors:  U Techavipoo; Q Chen; T Varghese; J A Zagzebski
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features.

Authors:  Andrea S Hong; Eric L Rosen; Mary S Soo; Jay A Baker
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.959

4.  Breast lesions: evaluation with US strain imaging--clinical experience of multiple observers.

Authors:  Dawn M Regner; Gina K Hesley; Nicholas J Hangiandreou; Marilyn J Morton; Michelle R Nordland; Duane D Meixner; Timothy J Hall; Michael A Farrell; Jayawant N Mandrekar; W Scott Harmsen; J William Charboneau
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Timothy J Hall; Amy M Sommer; Gina K Hesley; Gale A Sisney; William E Svensson; Jason P Fine; Jinfeng Jiang; Nicholas J Hangiandreou
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Tissue response to mechanical vibrations for "sonoelasticity imaging".

Authors:  K J Parker; S R Huang; R A Musulin; R M Lerner
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  A pulsed Doppler ultrasonic system for making noninvasive measurements of the mechanical properties of soft tissue.

Authors:  T A Krouskop; D R Dougherty; F S Vinson
Journal:  J Rehabil Res Dev       Date:  1987

8.  The natural history of breast carcinoma: what have we learned from screening?

Authors:  L Tabár; S W Duffy; B Vitak; H H Chen; T C Prevost
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1999-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Fibroadenoma of the breast: sonomammography correlated with pathology in 122 patients.

Authors:  C Cole-Beuglet; R Z Soriano; A B Kurtz; B B Goldberg
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Quantitative assessment of breast lesion viscoelasticity: initial clinical results using supersonic shear imaging.

Authors:  Mickael Tanter; Jeremy Bercoff; Alexandra Athanasiou; Thomas Deffieux; Jean-Luc Gennisson; Gabriel Montaldo; Marie Muller; Anne Tardivon; Mathias Fink
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  10 in total

1.  Analysis of shear strain imaging for classifying breast masses: finite element and phantom results.

Authors:  Haiyan Xu; Tomy Varghese; Ernest L Madsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Normal and shear strain imaging using 2D deformation tracking on beam steered linear array datasets.

Authors:  Haiyan Xu; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  On the advantages of imaging the axial-shear strain component of the total shear strain in breast tumors.

Authors:  Arun K Thittai; Belfor Galaz; Jonathan Ophir
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  In vivo classification of breast masses using features derived from axial-strain and axial-shear images.

Authors:  Haiyan Xu; Tomy Varghese; Jingfeng Jiang; James A Zagzebski
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.578

5.  Bayesian regularization applied to ultrasound strain imaging.

Authors:  Matthew McCormick; Nicholas Rubert; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-01-17       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Tissue mimicking materials for the detection of prostate cancer using shear wave elastography: a validation study.

Authors:  Rui Cao; Zhihong Huang; Tomy Varghese; Ghulam Nabi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Comparison of cardiac displacement and strain imaging using ultrasound radiofrequency and envelope signals.

Authors:  Chi Ma; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 2.890

8.  An analysis of the segmentation threshold used in axial-shear strain elastography.

Authors:  Arun K Thittai; Rongmin Xia
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 2.890

9.  Nonlinear characterization of breast cancer using multi-compression 3D ultrasound elastography in vivo.

Authors:  Ahmed Sayed; Ginger Layne; Jame Abraham; Osama Mukdadi
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.890

10.  The nanomechanical signature of breast cancer.

Authors:  Marija Plodinec; Marko Loparic; Christophe A Monnier; Ellen C Obermann; Rosanna Zanetti-Dallenbach; Philipp Oertle; Janne T Hyotyla; Ueli Aebi; Mohamed Bentires-Alj; Roderick Y H Lim; Cora-Ann Schoenenberger
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2012-10-21       Impact factor: 39.213

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.