Literature DB >> 25173068

An analysis of the segmentation threshold used in axial-shear strain elastography.

Arun K Thittai1, Rongmin Xia2.   

Abstract

Axial-shear strain elastography was introduced recently to image the tumor-host tissue boundary bonding characteristics. The image depicting the axial-shear strain distribution in a tissue under axial compression was termed as an axial-shear strain elastogram (ASSE). It has been demonstrated through simulation, tissue-mimicking phantom experiments, and retrospective analysis of in vivo breast lesion data that metrics quantifying the pattern of axial-shear strain distribution on ASSE can be used as features for identifying the lesion boundary condition as loosely-bonded or firmly-bonded. Consequently, features from ASSE have been shown to have potential in non-invasive breast lesion classification into benign versus malignant. Although there appears to be a broad concurrence in the results reported by different groups, important details pertaining to the appropriate segmentation threshold needed for - (1) displaying the ASSE as a color-overlay on top of corresponding Axial Strain Elastogram (ASE) and/or sonogram for feature visualization and (2) ASSE feature extraction are not yet fully addressed. In this study, we utilize ASSE from tissue mimicking phantom (with loosely-bonded and firmly-bonded inclusions) experiments and freehand - acquired in vivo breast lesion data (7 benign and 9 malignant) to analyze the effect of segmentation threshold on ASSE feature value, specifically, the "fill-in" feature that was introduced recently. We varied the segmentation threshold from 20% to 70% (of the maximum ASSE value) for each frame of the acquisition cine-loop of every data and computed the number of ASSE pixels within the lesion that was greater than or equal to this threshold value. If at least 40% of the pixels within the lesion area crossed this segmentation threshold, the ASSE frame was considered to demonstrate a "fill-in" that would indicate a loosely-bonded lesion boundary condition (suggestive of a benign lesion). Otherwise, the ASSE frame was considered not to demonstrate a "fill-in" indicating a firmly-bonded lesion boundary condition (suggestive of a malignant lesion). The results demonstrate that in the case of in vivo breast lesion data the appropriate range for the segmentation threshold value seems to be 40-60%. It was noted that for a segmentation threshold within this range (for example, at 50%) all of the analyzed breast lesion cases can be correctly classified into benign and malignant, based on the percentage number of frames within the acquisition cine-loop that demonstrate a "fill-in".
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Axial–shear strain; Benign; Elastography; Malignant; Segmentation threshold

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25173068      PMCID: PMC4185333          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2014.08.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  22 in total

1.  Contrast-transfer efficiency for continuously varying tissue moduli: simulation and phantom validation.

Authors:  F Kallel; C D Prihoda; J Ophir
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Elastographic imaging using staggered strain estimates.

Authors:  S Srinivasan; J Ophir; S K Alam
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.578

3.  Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues.

Authors:  J Ophir; I Céspedes; H Ponnekanti; Y Yazdi; X Li
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.578

Review 4.  Breast elasticity: principles, technique, results: an update and overview of commercially available software.

Authors:  C Balleyguier; S Canale; W Ben Hassen; P Vielh; E H Bayou; M C Mathieu; C Uzan; C Bourgier; C Dromain
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2012-03-24       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: Basic principles and technology.

Authors:  J Bamber; D Cosgrove; C F Dietrich; J Fromageau; J Bojunga; F Calliada; V Cantisani; J-M Correas; M D'Onofrio; E E Drakonaki; M Fink; M Friedrich-Rust; O H Gilja; R F Havre; C Jenssen; A S Klauser; R Ohlinger; A Saftoiu; F Schaefer; I Sporea; F Piscaglia
Journal:  Ultraschall Med       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 6.548

6.  Dynamic frame pairing in real-time freehand elastography.

Authors:  Rongmin Xia; Guozhi Tao; Arun Kumar Thittai
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Elastography: elasticity imaging using ultrasound with application to muscle and breast in vivo.

Authors:  I Céspedes; J Ophir; H Ponnekanti; N Maklad
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 1.578

8.  On the advantages of imaging the axial-shear strain component of the total shear strain in breast tumors.

Authors:  Arun K Thittai; Belfor Galaz; Jonathan Ophir
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Small breast lesion classification performance using the normalized axial-shear strain area feature.

Authors:  Arun K Thittai; Jose-Miguel Yamal; Jonathan Ophir
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Nonlinear characterization of breast cancer using multi-compression 3D ultrasound elastography in vivo.

Authors:  Ahmed Sayed; Ginger Layne; Jame Abraham; Osama Mukdadi
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.890

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.