Literature DB >> 22047376

Analysis of shear strain imaging for classifying breast masses: finite element and phantom results.

Haiyan Xu1, Tomy Varghese, Ernest L Madsen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Features extracted from axial-shear strain images of breast masses have been previously utilized to differentiate and classify benign from malignant breast masses. In this paper, we compare shear strain patterns exhibited by both the full-shear (axial and lateral component) versus only the axial-shear strain component for differentiating between bound masses (malignant) when compared to unbound masses (benign).
METHODS: We examine different breast mass characteristics such as mass shape, asymmetric location of masses, stiffness variations, and mass bonding characteristics to background tissue to assess their impact on shear strain patterns generated due to a uniaxial applied deformation. Two-dimensional finite element simulations of both circular and elliptical inclusions embedded within a uniform background were utilized. Different degrees of bonding were characterized using friction coefficient values ranging from 0.01 to 100 denoting loosely bound to firmly bound masses. Single-inclusion tissue-mimicking phantoms mimicking firmly bound and loosely bound ellipsoidal masses oriented at four different angles to the applied deformation were studied to corroborate the mass differentiation performance.
RESULTS: Our results indicate that the normalized axial-shear strain and full-shear strain area features are larger for bound when compared to unbound masses. A higher stiffness ratio or contrast between the inclusion and background also improves differentiation. Larger applied deformations reduce the discrimination performance for masses with friction coefficients lower than 0.4, due to increased mass slippage with applied deformations. Potential errors with the use of these features would occur for unbound inclusions at larger applied deformations and for asymmetric mass positions within the background normal tissue.
CONCLUSIONS: Finite element and tissue-mimicking phantom results demonstrate the feasibility of utilizing both the normalized axial-shear and full-shear strain area features to classify breast masses. Differentiation between bound or unbound masses was not affected by the mass size or shape for masses where the applied deformation is normal to the mass surface. Shear strain patterns vary significantly especially within unbound masses, when the mass surface is not normal to the applied deformation. Discrimination performance for unbound masses was improved by utilizing only the normalized shear strain area patterns located outside the mass as illustrated in this paper.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22047376      PMCID: PMC3221707          DOI: 10.1118/1.3651461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  37 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound elasticity imaging: definition and technology.

Authors:  J C Bamber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Elastography: ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues.

Authors:  J Ophir; S K Alam; B Garra; F Kallel; E Konofagou; T Krouskop; T Varghese
Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.617

3.  Estimation of displacement vectors and strain tensors in elastography using angular insonifications.

Authors:  U Techavipoo; Q Chen; T Varghese; J A Zagzebski
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Breast lesions: evaluation with US strain imaging--clinical experience of multiple observers.

Authors:  Dawn M Regner; Gina K Hesley; Nicholas J Hangiandreou; Marilyn J Morton; Michelle R Nordland; Duane D Meixner; Timothy J Hall; Michael A Farrell; Jayawant N Mandrekar; W Scott Harmsen; J William Charboneau
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Timothy J Hall; Amy M Sommer; Gina K Hesley; Gale A Sisney; William E Svensson; Jason P Fine; Jinfeng Jiang; Nicholas J Hangiandreou
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Tissue response to mechanical vibrations for "sonoelasticity imaging".

Authors:  K J Parker; S R Huang; R A Musulin; R M Lerner
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 7.  Breast cancer screening.

Authors:  B E Sirovich; H C Sox
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  Intravascular elastography: principles and potentials.

Authors:  E I Céspedes; C L de Korte; A F van der Steen; C von Birgelen; C T Lancée
Journal:  Semin Interv Cardiol       Date:  1997-03

9.  Axial-shear strain imaging for differentiating benign and malignant breast masses.

Authors:  Haiyan Xu; Min Rao; Tomy Varghese; Amy Sommer; Sara Baker; Timothy J Hall; Gale A Sisney; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Semiautomated thermal lesion segmentation for three-dimensional elastographic imaging.

Authors:  U Techavipoo; T Varghese; J A Zagzebski; Q Chen; W Liu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  5 in total

1.  Deformable Registration for Longitudinal Breast MRI Screening.

Authors:  Hatef Mehrabian; Lara Richmond; Yingli Lu; Anne L Martel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Normal and shear strain imaging using 2D deformation tracking on beam steered linear array datasets.

Authors:  Haiyan Xu; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  On the advantages of imaging the axial-shear strain component of the total shear strain in breast tumors.

Authors:  Arun K Thittai; Belfor Galaz; Jonathan Ophir
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  In vivo classification of breast masses using features derived from axial-strain and axial-shear images.

Authors:  Haiyan Xu; Tomy Varghese; Jingfeng Jiang; James A Zagzebski
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.578

5.  Nonlinear characterization of breast cancer using multi-compression 3D ultrasound elastography in vivo.

Authors:  Ahmed Sayed; Ginger Layne; Jame Abraham; Osama Mukdadi
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 2.890

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.