Literature DB >> 31548103

Large-Strain 3-D in Vivo Breast Ultrasound Strain Elastography Using a Multi-compression Strategy and a Whole-Breast Scanning System.

Yuqi Wang1, Matthew Bayer2, Jingfeng Jiang3, Timothy J Hall4.   

Abstract

Non-linear mechanical properties of breast tissue can be employed to diagnose and differentiate breast tumors. To obtain such non-linear mechanical properties, it is necessary to track tissue motion under large deformation. In this study, a multi-compression strategy was utilized to produce large tissue deformation, and a method to estimate 3-D motion of tissue under large deformation was introduced. Given multiple volumes of ultrasound data, the proposed method first estimates volume-to-volume incremental displacements using a 3-D region-growing motion-tracking method. Then, possible outliers among all incremental displacements are removed to avoid error accumulation. Once large displacement errors have been removed, all incremental displacements are registered together to obtain accumulated displacements under large tissue deformation (e.g., >10%). The proposed method was tested with one set of in vivo tumor-bearing ultrasound data acquired from a human subject. A total of 10 small-strain deformation steps were performed to obtain the final accumulated displacement field, in which the breast lesion and its surrounding were deformed by approximately 6% and 16%, respectively. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the elasticity images obtained with the proposed method were all higher than those obtained with a 2-D tracking method. Furthermore, in three orthogonal views of accumulated axial strain images, the breast lesion was clearly visible with good correspondence between the axial strain and B-mode images.
Copyright © 2019 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3-D strain elastography; Large deformation; Motion tracking; Multi-compression; Ultrasound; Whole-breast ultrasound

Year:  2019        PMID: 31548103      PMCID: PMC6823158          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2019.08.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  22 in total

1.  Nonlinear stress-strain relationships in tissue and their effect on the contrast-to-noise ratio in elastograms.

Authors:  T Varghese; J Ophir; T A Krouskop
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Measuring the elastic modulus of ex vivo small tissue samples.

Authors:  Abbas Samani; Jonathan Bishop; Chris Luginbuhl; Donald B Plewes
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-07-21       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  A nonlinear elasticity phantom containing spherical inclusions.

Authors:  Theo Z Pavan; Ernest L Madsen; Gary R Frank; Jingfeng Jiang; Antonio A O Carneiro; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Optimizing multicompression approaches to elasticity imaging.

Authors:  Huini Du; Jie Liu; Claire Pellot-Barakat; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Error analysis in acoustic elastography. II. Strain estimation and SNR analysis.

Authors:  M Bilgen; M F Insana
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  WFUMB guidelines and recommendations for clinical use of ultrasound elastography: Part 2: breast.

Authors:  Richard G Barr; Kazutaka Nakashima; Dominique Amy; David Cosgrove; Andre Farrokh; Fritz Schafer; Jeffrey C Bamber; Laurent Castera; Byung Ihn Choi; Yi-Hong Chou; Christoph F Dietrich; Hong Ding; Giovanna Ferraioli; Carlo Filice; Mireen Friedrich-Rust; Timothy J Hall; Kathryn R Nightingale; Mark L Palmeri; Tsuyoshi Shiina; Shinichi Suzuki; Ioan Sporea; Stephanie Wilson; Masatoshi Kudo
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  In vivo real-time freehand palpation imaging.

Authors:  Timothy J Hall; Yanning Zhu; Candace S Spalding
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  The effect of age and density of the breast on the sensitivity of breast cancer diagnostic by mammography and ultasonography.

Authors:  I Saarenmaa; T Salminen; U Geiger; P Heikkinen; S Hyvärinen; J Isola; V Kataja; M L Kokko; R Kokko; E Kumpulainen; A Kärkkäinen; J Pakkanen; P Peltonen; A Piironen; A Salo; M L Talviala; M Haka
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Variance and covariance of accumulated displacement estimates.

Authors:  Matthew Bayer; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.578

10.  Linear and nonlinear elasticity imaging of soft tissue in vivo: demonstration of feasibility.

Authors:  Assad A Oberai; Nachiket H Gokhale; Sevan Goenezen; Paul E Barbone; Timothy J Hall; Amy M Sommer; Jingfeng Jiang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  2 in total

1.  A Non-invasive Method to Estimate the Stress-Strain Curve of Soft Tissue Using Ultrasound Elastography.

Authors:  Yuqi Wang; Daniel S Jacobson; Matthew W Urban
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 2.998

2.  Nonlinear Elasticity Assessment with Optical Coherence Elastography for High-Selectivity Differentiation of Breast Cancer Tissues.

Authors:  Ekaterina V Gubarkova; Aleksander A Sovetsky; Lev A Matveev; Aleksander L Matveyev; Dmitry A Vorontsov; Anton A Plekhanov; Sergey S Kuznetsov; Sergey V Gamayunov; Alexey Y Vorontsov; Marina A Sirotkina; Natalia D Gladkova; Vladimir Y Zaitsev
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.748

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.