Nishikant P Deshmukh1, Jesus J Caban2, Russell H Taylor3, Gregory D Hager3, Emad M Boctor3,4. 1. Department of Computer Science, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. nishikant@cs.jhu.edu. 2. National Intrepid Center of Excellence, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA. 3. Department of Computer Science, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. 4. Department of Radiology, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: A five-dimensional ultrasound (US) system is proposed as a real-time pipeline involving fusion of 3D B-mode data with the 3D ultrasound elastography (USE) data as well as visualization of these fused data and a real-time update capability over time for each consecutive scan. 3D B-mode data assist in visualizing the anatomy of the target organ, and 3D elastography data adds strain information. METHODS: We investigate the feasibility of such a system and show that an end-to-end real-time system, from acquisition to visualization, can be developed. We present a system that consists of (a) a real-time 3D elastography algorithm based on a normalized cross-correlation (NCC) computation on a GPU; (b) real-time 3D B-mode acquisition and network transfer; (c) scan conversion of 3D elastography and B-mode volumes (if acquired by 4D wobbler probe); and (d) visualization software that fuses, visualizes, and updates 3D B-mode and 3D elastography data in real time. RESULTS: We achieved a speed improvement of 4.45-fold for the threaded version of the NCC-based 3D USE versus the non-threaded version. The maximum speed was 79 volumes/s for 3D scan conversion. In a phantom, we validated the dimensions of a 2.2-cm-diameter sphere scan-converted to B-mode volume. Also, we validated the 5D US system visualization transfer function and detected 1- and 2-cm spherical objects (phantom lesion). Finally, we applied the system to a phantom consisting of three lesions to delineate the lesions from the surrounding background regions of the phantom. CONCLUSION: A 5D US system is achievable with real-time performance. We can distinguish between hard and soft areas in a phantom using the transfer functions.
PURPOSE: A five-dimensional ultrasound (US) system is proposed as a real-time pipeline involving fusion of 3D B-mode data with the 3D ultrasound elastography (USE) data as well as visualization of these fused data and a real-time update capability over time for each consecutive scan. 3D B-mode data assist in visualizing the anatomy of the target organ, and 3D elastography data adds strain information. METHODS: We investigate the feasibility of such a system and show that an end-to-end real-time system, from acquisition to visualization, can be developed. We present a system that consists of (a) a real-time 3D elastography algorithm based on a normalized cross-correlation (NCC) computation on a GPU; (b) real-time 3D B-mode acquisition and network transfer; (c) scan conversion of 3D elastography and B-mode volumes (if acquired by 4D wobbler probe); and (d) visualization software that fuses, visualizes, and updates 3D B-mode and 3D elastography data in real time. RESULTS: We achieved a speed improvement of 4.45-fold for the threaded version of the NCC-based 3D USE versus the non-threaded version. The maximum speed was 79 volumes/s for 3D scan conversion. In a phantom, we validated the dimensions of a 2.2-cm-diameter sphere scan-converted to B-mode volume. Also, we validated the 5D US system visualization transfer function and detected 1- and 2-cm spherical objects (phantom lesion). Finally, we applied the system to a phantom consisting of three lesions to delineate the lesions from the surrounding background regions of the phantom. CONCLUSION: A 5D US system is achievable with real-time performance. We can distinguish between hard and soft areas in a phantom using the transfer functions.
Keywords:
3D elastography; 3D scan conversion; Computer graphics; Elastography; Five-dimensional ultrasound system; GPU; Medical imaging; OpenGL; Ultrasound; Visualization
Authors: Elizabeth S Burnside; Timothy J Hall; Amy M Sommer; Gina K Hesley; Gale A Sisney; William E Svensson; Jason P Fine; Jinfeng Jiang; Nicholas J Hangiandreou Journal: Radiology Date: 2007-11 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Nishant Uniyal; Hani Eskandari; Purang Abolmaesumi; Samira Sojoudi; Paula Gordon; Linda Warren; Robert N Rohling; Septimiu E Salcudean; Mehdi Moradi Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2014-10-24 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Nishikant P Deshmukh; Hyun Jae Kang; Seth D Billings; Russell H Taylor; Gregory D Hager; Emad M Boctor Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-12-26 Impact factor: 3.240