Literature DB >> 35171498

Considerations for developing regulations for direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a scoping review using the 3-I framework.

Alexandra Cernat1,2, Naazish S Bashir2, Wendy J Ungar3,4.   

Abstract

Direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing exists largely outside of any regulatory schemes, and studies providing a comprehensive overview of the ethical, social, legal, and technological considerations for regulating these types of technologies are lacking. This paper uses the 3-I framework for policy analysis to analyze the ideas, interests, and institutions relevant to policy development for DTC genetic testing in North America and internationally. A scoping review was conducted. Citation databases were searched for papers addressing the ethical, social, legal, and technological implications of DTC genetic testing; stakeholder perspectives on and experiences with DTC genetic testing; or the effect of such testing on the healthcare system. Ninety-nine publications, organizational reports, governmental documents, or pieces of legislation were included. The ideas included are autonomy, informed decision making, privacy, and clinical validity and utility. The interests discussed are those of the public and healthcare providers. The institutions included are regulatory organizations such as the Food and Drug Administration in the United States, laws governing the implementation or delivery of genetic testing in general, and legislation created to protect against genetic discrimination. This analysis clarifies the ethical, social, legal, and technological issues of DTC genetic testing regulation. This information can be used by policy makers to develop or strengthen regulations for DTC genetic testing such as requiring an assessment of the clinical validity of tests before they become publicly available, controlling how tests are marketed, and stipulating requirements for healthcare provider involvement and informed consent.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Direct-to-consumer screening and testing; Genetic testing; Health policy; Health services research; Review

Year:  2022        PMID: 35171498      PMCID: PMC8941003          DOI: 10.1007/s12687-022-00582-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Genet        ISSN: 1868-310X


  75 in total

1.  An exploration of genetic health professionals' experience with direct-to-consumer genetic testing in their clinical practice.

Authors:  Gemma R Brett; Sylvia A Metcalfe; David J Amor; Jane L Halliday
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Health-care referrals from direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Authors:  Monica A Giovanni; Matthew R Fickie; Lisa S Lehmann; Robert C Green; Lisa M Meckley; David Veenstra; Michael F Murray
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2010-10-28

3.  The Golden State Killer investigation and the nascent field of forensic genealogy.

Authors:  Chris Phillips
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.882

4.  Attitudes about regulation among direct-to-consumer genetic testing customers.

Authors:  Juli Murphy Bollinger; Robert C Green; David Kaufman
Journal:  Genet Test Mol Biomarkers       Date:  2013-04-06

5.  Influence of individual differences in disease perception on consumer response to direct-to-consumer genomic testing.

Authors:  D L Boeldt; N J Schork; E J Topol; C S Bloss
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing and Personal Genomics Services: A Review of Recent Empirical Studies.

Authors:  J Scott Roberts; Jenny Ostergren
Journal:  Curr Genet Med Rep       Date:  2013-09

7.  Healthcare professionals' and patients' perspectives on consent to clinical genetic testing: moving towards a more relational approach.

Authors:  Gabrielle Natalie Samuel; Sandi Dheensa; Bobbie Farsides; Angela Fenwick; Anneke Lucassen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 2.652

8.  Primary Care Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Experience with Personal Genetic Testing.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Esther Kim; Rachel A Myers; Geoffrey S Ginsburg
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2019-05-24

9.  Genetic Privacy and Data Protection: A Review of Chinese Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Test Services.

Authors:  Li Du; Meng Wang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 10.  Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Loredana Covolo; Sara Rubinelli; Elisabetta Ceretti; Umberto Gelatti
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.