Literature DB >> 19968666

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: good, bad or benign?

T Caulfield1, N M Ries, P N Ray, C Shuman, B Wilson.   

Abstract

A wide variety of genetic tests are now being marketed and sold in direct-to-consumer (DTC) commercial transactions. However, risk information revealed through many DTC testing services, especially those based on emerging genome wide-association studies, has limited predictive value for consumers. Some commentators contend that tests are being marketed prematurely, while others support rapid translation of genetic research findings to the marketplace. The potential harms and benefits of DTC access to genetic testing are not yet well understood, but some large-scale studies have recently been launched to examine how consumers understand and use genetic risk information. Greater consumer access to genetic tests creates a need for continuing education for health care professionals so they can respond to patients' inquiries about the benefits, risks and limitations of DTC services. Governmental bodies in many jurisdictions are considering options for regulating practices of DTC genetic testing companies, particularly to govern quality of commercial genetic tests and ensure fair and truthful advertising. Intersectoral initiatives involving government regulators, professional bodies and industry are important to facilitate development of standards to govern this rapidly developing area of personalized genomic commerce.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19968666     DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2009.01291.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Genet        ISSN: 0009-9163            Impact factor:   4.438


  30 in total

1.  Current directions in behavioral medicine research on genetic testing for disease susceptibility: introduction to the special section.

Authors:  Kerry A Sherman; Linda D Cameron
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-10

Review 2.  Communicating genetic risk information for common disorders in the era of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Denise M Lautenbach; Kurt D Christensen; Jeffrey A Sparks; Robert C Green
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 8.929

3.  Engagement with Genetic Information and Uptake of Genetic Testing: the Role of Trust and Personal Cancer History.

Authors:  Megan C Roberts; Jennifer M Taber; William M Klein
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Consumer Perspectives on Access to Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Role of Demographic Factors and the Testing Experience.

Authors:  Sarah E Gollust; Stacy W Gray; Deanna Alexis Carere; Barbara A Koenig; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Amy L McGUIRE; Richard R Sharp; Kayte Spector-Bagdady; N A Wang; Robert C Green; J Scott Roberts
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 4.911

5.  The effect of disease risk probability and disease type on interest in clinic-based versus direct-to-consumer genetic testing services.

Authors:  Kerry Sherman; Laura-Kate Shaw; Katrina Champion; Fernanda Caldeira; Margaret McCaskill
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2015-03-27

Review 6.  The perspective from EASAC and FEAM on direct-to-consumer genetic testing for health-related purposes.

Authors:  Robin Fears; Volker ter Meulen
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Direct-to-consumer genomic testing from the perspective of the health professional: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Lesley Goldsmith; Leigh Jackson; Anita O'Connor; Heather Skirton
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-01-16

Review 8.  Nutritional Genomics and Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: An Overview.

Authors:  Marta Guasch-Ferré; Hassan S Dashti; Jordi Merino
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 9.  Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; John W Belmont; Jonathan S Berg; Benjamin E Berkman; Yvonne Bombard; Ingrid A Holm; Howard P Levy; Kelly E Ormond; Howard M Saal; Nancy B Spinner; Benjamin S Wilfond; Joseph D McInerney
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: perspectives from research participants.

Authors:  S E Gollust; E S Gordon; C Zayac; G Griffin; M F Christman; R E Pyeritz; L Wawak; B A Bernhardt
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 2.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.