Literature DB >> 20828856

Illusions of scientific legitimacy: misrepresented science in the direct-to-consumer genetic-testing marketplace.

Amy B Vashlishan Murray1, Michael J Carson, Corey A Morris, Jon Beckwith.   

Abstract

Marketers of genetic tests often openly or implicitly misrepresent the utility of genetic information. Scientists who are well aware of the current limitations to the utility of such tests are best placed to publicly counter misrepresentations of the science.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh：

Year:  2010        PMID： 20828856     DOI： 10.1016/j.tig.2010.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Genet        ISSN： 0168-9525            Impact factor:   11.639


  9 in total

1.  An exploration of genetic health professionals' experience with direct-to-consumer genetic testing in their clinical practice.

Authors:  Gemma R Brett; Sylvia A Metcalfe; David J Amor; Jane L Halliday
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Risky business: risk perception and the use of medical services among customers of DTC personal genetic testing.

Authors:  David J Kaufman; Juli M Bollinger; Rachel L Dvoskin; Joan A Scott
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Direct-to-consumer genomic testing from the perspective of the health professional: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Lesley Goldsmith; Leigh Jackson; Anita O'Connor; Heather Skirton
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-01-16

4.  Effect of direct-to-consumer genetic tests on health behaviour and anxiety: a survey of consumers and potential consumers.

Authors:  Corin Egglestone; Anne Morris; Ann O'Brien
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Direct-to-consumer genomic testing: systematic review of the literature on user perspectives.

Authors:  Lesley Goldsmith; Leigh Jackson; Anita O'Connor; Heather Skirton
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 6.  Genomics and perinatal care.

Authors:  Joann Bodurtha; Jerome F Strauss
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; John W Belmont; Jonathan S Berg; Benjamin E Berkman; Yvonne Bombard; Ingrid A Holm; Howard P Levy; Kelly E Ormond; Howard M Saal; Nancy B Spinner; Benjamin S Wilfond; Joseph D McInerney
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Current State and Future Prospects of Direct-to-Consumer Pharmacogenetics.

Authors:  E W Chua; M A Kennedy
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Looking back at genomic medicine in 2011.

Authors:  Charles Auffray; Timothy Caulfield; Muin J Khoury; James R Lupski; Matthias Schwab; Timothy Veenstra
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 11.117
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.