Literature DB >> 22207397

Educational needs of primary care physicians regarding direct-to-consumer genetic testing.

Karen P Powell1, Carol A Christianson, Whitney A Cogswell, Gaurav Dave, Amit Verma, Sonja Eubanks, Vincent C Henrich.   

Abstract

To assess the educational needs of North Carolina primary care physicians (PCPs) about direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing, surveys were mailed to 2,402 family and internal medicine providers in North Carolina. Out of 382 respondents, 323 (85%) felt unprepared to answer patient questions and 282 (74%) reported wanting to learn about DTC genetic testing. A total of 148 (39%) were aware of DTC genetic testing. Among these, 63 (43%) thought DTC genetic testing was clinically useful. PCPs who felt either unprepared to answer patient questions (OR = 0.354, p = 0.01) or that DTC genetic testing was clinically useful (OR = 5.783, p = 0.00) were more likely to want to learn about DTC genetic testing. PCPs are interested in learning about DTC genetic testing, but are mostly unaware of DTC testing and feel unprepared to help patients with DTC testing results. Familiar and trusted channels that provide the information and tools PCPs need to help answer patient's questions and manage their care should be used when creating educational programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22207397     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-011-9471-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  34 in total

1.  Deficient knowledge of genetics relevant for daily practice among medical students nearing graduation.

Authors:  Marieke J H Baars; Albert J J A Scherpbier; Lambert W Schuwirth; Lidewij Henneman; Frits A Beemer; Jan Maarten Cobben; Raoul C M Hennekam; Marian M J J Verweij; Martina C Cornel; Leo P Ten Kate
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 8.822

2.  Long-term outcomes of the "Genetics in Primary Care" faculty development initiative.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Laberge; Kelly Fryer-Edwards; Penny Kyler; Michele A Lloyd-Puryear; Wylie Burke
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  General practice postal surveys: a questionnaire too far?

Authors:  B R McAvoy; E F Kaner
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-21

4.  Cancer genetics--survey of primary care physicians' attitudes and practices.

Authors:  L C Friedman; S E Plon; H P Cooper; A D Weinberg
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Social networkers' attitudes toward direct-to-consumer personal genome testing.

Authors:  Amy L McGuire; Christina M Diaz; Tao Wang; Susan G Hilsenbeck
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.229

6.  Empowering primary care health professionals in medical genetics: how soon? How fast? How far?

Authors:  K Greendale; R E Pyeritz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001

Review 7.  Genetic testing in primary care.

Authors:  Wylie Burke
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 8.929

8.  The current status of medical genetics instruction in US and Canadian medical schools.

Authors:  Virginia Carol Thurston; Paula Sue Wales; Mary Alice Bell; Laura Torbeck; James Joseph Brokaw
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Genetics in primary care: a USA faculty development initiative.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Louise Acheson; Jeffery Botkin; Kenneth Bridges; Ardis Davis; James Evans; Jaime Frias; James Hanson; Norman Kahn; Ruth Kahn; David Lanier; Linda E Pinsky; Nancy Press; Michele A Lloyd-Puryear; Eugene Rich; Nancy Stevens; Elizabeth Thomson; Steven Wartman; Modena Wilson
Journal:  Community Genet       Date:  2002

10.  Genetics of common disease: a primary care priority aligned with a teachable moment?

Authors:  W Gregory Feero
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  21 in total

1.  Primary care providers' experiences with and perceptions of personalized genomic medicine.

Authors:  June C Carroll; Tutsirai Makuwaza; Donna P Manca; Nicolette Sopcak; Joanne A Permaul; Mary Ann O'Brien; Ruth Heisey; Elizabeth A Eisenhauer; Julie Easley; Monika K Krzyzanowska; Baukje Miedema; Sandhya Pruthi; Carol Sawka; Nancy Schneider; Jonathan Sussman; Robin Urquhart; Catarina Versaevel; Eva Grunfeld
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Direct-to-consumer genomic testing from the perspective of the health professional: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Lesley Goldsmith; Leigh Jackson; Anita O'Connor; Heather Skirton
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-01-16

3.  Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing and Personal Genomics Services: A Review of Recent Empirical Studies.

Authors:  J Scott Roberts; Jenny Ostergren
Journal:  Curr Genet Med Rep       Date:  2013-09

4.  "Bridge to the Literature"? Third-Party Genetic Interpretation Tools and the Views of Tool Developers.

Authors:  Sarah C Nelson; Stephanie M Fullerton
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Incorporating direct-to-consumer genomic information into patient care: attitudes and experiences of primary care physicians.

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt; Cara Zayac; Erynn S Gordon; Lisa Wawak; Reed E Pyeritz; Sarah E Gollust
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Do physicians think genomic medicine will be useful for patient care?

Authors:  Sridharan Raghavan; Jason L Vassy
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.512

7.  Utilization of Genetic Counseling after Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.

Authors:  Diane R Koeller; Wendy R Uhlmann; Deanna Alexis Carere; Robert C Green; J Scott Roberts
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Introducing genetic testing for cardiovascular disease in primary care: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jo B Middlemass; Momina F Yazdani; Joe Kai; Penelope J Standen; Nadeem Qureshi
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Interest and informational preferences regarding genomic testing for modest increases in colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  A E Anderson; K G Flores; W Boonyasiriwat; A Gammon; W Kohlmann; W C Birmingham; M D Schwartz; J Samadder; K Boucher; A Y Kinney
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.000

10.  After the revolution? Ethical and social challenges in 'personalized genomic medicine'

Authors:  Eric T Juengst; Richard A Settersten; Jennifer R Fishman; Michelle L McGowan
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 2.512

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.