Literature DB >> 30625429

Synthesizing mammogram from digital breast tomosynthesis.

Jun Wei1, Heang-Ping Chan, Mark A Helvie, Marilyn A Roubidoux, Colleen H Neal, Yao Lu, Lubomir M Hadjiiski, Chuan Zhou.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a new method for generating synthesized mammogram (SM) from digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and to assess its potential as an adjunct to DBT. We first applied multiscale bilateral filtering to the reconstructed DBT slices to enhance the high-frequency features and reduce noise. A maximum intensity projection (MIP) image was then obtained from the high-frequency components of the DBT slices. A multiscale image fusion method was designed to combine the MIP image and the central DBT projection view into an SM and further enhance the high-frequency features. We conducted a pilot reader study to visually assess the image quality of SM in comparison to full field digital mammograms (FFDM). For each DBT craniocaudal or mediolateral view, a clinical FFDM of the corresponding view was retrospectively collected. Three MQSA radiologists, blinded to the pathological and other clinical information, independently interpreted the SM and the corresponding FFDM side by side marked with the lesion locations. The differences in the BI-RADS assessments of both MCs and masses between SM and FFDM did not achieve statistical significance for all three readers. The conspicuity of MCs on SM was superior to that on FFDM and the BI-RADS assessments of MCs were comparable while the conspicuity of masses on SM was degraded and interpretation on SM was less accurate than that on FFDM. The SM may be useful for efficient prescreening of MCs in DBT but the DBT should be used for detection and characterization of masses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30625429      PMCID: PMC6438841          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aafcda

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  31 in total

1.  Multiscale contrast enhancement for radiographies: Laplacian Pyramid versus fast wavelet transform.

Authors:  Sabine Dippel; Martin Stahl; Rafael Wiemker; Thomas Blaffert
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Computer-aided detection of breast masses on full field digital mammograms.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Berkman Sahiner; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Heang-Ping Chan; Nicholas Petrick; Mark A Helvie; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Jun Ge; Chuan Zhou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Multiscale bilateral filtering for improving image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Yao Lu; Heang-Ping Chan; Jun Wei; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Ravi K Samala
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis with a wide scan angle compared to full-field digital mammography for the detection and characterization of microcalcifications.

Authors:  Paola Clauser; Georg Nagl; Thomas H Helbich; Katja Pinker-Domenig; Michael Weber; Panagiotis Kapetas; Maria Bernathova; Pascal A T Baltzer
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  Early clinical experience with digital breast tomosynthesis for screening mammography.

Authors:  Melissa A Durand; Brian M Haas; Xiaopan Yao; Jaime L Geisel; Madhavi Raghu; Regina J Hooley; Laura J Horvath; Liane E Philpotts
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program.

Authors:  Per Skaane; Andriy I Bandos; Randi Gullien; Ellen B Eben; Ulrika Ekseth; Unni Haakenaasen; Mina Izadi; Ingvild N Jebsen; Gunnar Jahr; Mona Krager; Loren T Niklason; Solveig Hofvind; David Gur
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-01-07       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Two-view digital breast tomosynthesis screening with synthetically reconstructed projection images: comparison with digital breast tomosynthesis with full-field digital mammographic images.

Authors:  Per Skaane; Andriy I Bandos; Ellen B Eben; Ingvild N Jebsen; Mona Krager; Unni Haakenaasen; Ulrika Ekseth; Mina Izadi; Solveig Hofvind; Randi Gullien
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Comparison of two-dimensional synthesized mammograms versus original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images.

Authors:  Margarita L Zuley; Ben Guo; Victor J Catullo; Denise M Chough; Amy E Kelly; Amy H Lu; Grace Y Rathfon; Marion Lee Spangler; Jules H Sumkin; Luisa P Wallace; Andriy I Bandos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.

Authors:  Julianne S Greenberg; Marcia C Javitt; Jason Katzen; Sara Michael; Agnes E Holland
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings.

Authors:  Ingvar Andersson; Debra M Ikeda; Sophia Zackrisson; Mark Ruschin; Tony Svahn; Pontus Timberg; Anders Tingberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-19       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  2 in total

1.  Technical evaluation of image quality in synthetic mammograms obtained from 15° and 40° digital breast tomosynthesis in a commercial system: a quantitative comparison.

Authors:  Patrizio Barca; Rocco Lamastra; Raffaele Maria Tucciariello; Antonio Traino; Carolina Marini; Giacomo Aringhieri; Davide Caramella; Maria Evelina Fantacci
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2020-11-23

2.  Quantitative assessment of microcalcification cluster image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis, 2-dimensional and synthetic mammography.

Authors:  Andreas E Petropoulos; Spyros G Skiadopoulos; Anna N Karahaliou; Gerasimos A T Messaris; Nikolaos S Arikidis; Lena I Costaridou
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 2.602

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.