Literature DB >> 6235317

Effect of lexical status on phonetic categorization.

R A Fox.   

Abstract

To investigate the interaction in speech perception between lexical knowledge (in particular, whether a stimulus token makes a word or nonword) and phonetic categorization, sets of [bVC]-[dVC] place-of-articulation continua were constructed so that the endpoint tokens represented word-word, word-nonword, nonword-word, and nonword-nonword combinations. Experiment 1 demonstrated that ambiguous tokens were perceived in favor of the word token and supported the contention that lexical knowledge can affect the process of phonetic categorization. Experiment 2 utilized a reaction time procedure with the same stimuli and demonstrated that the effect of lexical status on phonetic categorization increased with response latency, suggesting that the lexical effect represents a perceptual process that is separate from and follows phonetic categorization. Experiment 3 utilized a different set of [b-d] continua to separate the effects of final consonant contrast and lexical status that were confounded in Experiments 1 and 2. Results demonstrated that both lexical status and contextual contrast separately affected the identification of the initial stop. Data from these three experiments support a perceptual model wherein phonetic categorization can operate separately from higher levels of analysis.

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6235317     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.10.4.526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  15 in total

1.  The influence of sublexical and lexical representations on the processing of spoken words in English.

Authors:  Michael S Vitevitch
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.346

2.  Context effects on musical chord categorization: Different forms of top-down feedback in speech and music?

Authors:  Bob McMurray; Joel L Dennhardt; Andrew Struck-Marcell
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-07

3.  Do postonset segments define a lexical neighborhood?

Authors:  Rochelle S Newman; James R Sawusch; Paul A Luce
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-09

4.  Subcategorical phonetic mismatches and lexical access.

Authors:  D H Whalen
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1991-10

5.  Lexically guided perceptual learning is robust to task-based changes in listening strategy.

Authors:  Julia R Drouin; Rachel M Theodore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  A distinction between the effects of sentential speaking rate and semantic congruity on word identification.

Authors:  J L Miller; K Green; T M Schermer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-10

7.  Gaining knowledge mediates changes in perception (without differences in attention): A case for perceptual learning.

Authors:  Lauren L Emberson
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 12.579

8.  Temporal cortex reflects effects of sentence context on phonetic processing.

Authors:  Sara Guediche; Caden Salvata; Sheila E Blumstein
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-01-02       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  The strength and time course of lexical activation of pronunciation variants.

Authors:  Mark A Pitt
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Speech perception and lexical effects in specific language impairment.

Authors:  Richard G Schwartz; Frances L V Scheffler; Karece Lopez
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.346

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.