Literature DB >> 27100909

An fMRI study investigating effects of conceptually related sentences on the perception of degraded speech.

Sara Guediche1, Megan Reilly2, Carolina Santiago3, Patryk Laurent, Sheila E Blumstein4.   

Abstract

Prior research has shown that the perception of degraded speech is influenced by within sentence meaning and recruits one or more components of a frontal-temporal-parietal network. The goal of the current study is to examine whether the overall conceptual meaning of a sentence, made up of one set of words, influences the perception of a second acoustically degraded sentence, made up of a different set of words. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), we presented an acoustically clear sentence followed by an acoustically degraded sentence and manipulated the semantic relationship between them: Related in meaning (but consisting of different content words), Unrelated in meaning, or Same. Results showed that listeners' word recognition accuracy for the acoustically degraded sentences was significantly higher when the target sentence was preceded by a conceptually related compared to a conceptually unrelated sentence. Sensitivity to conceptual relationships was associated with enhanced activity in middle and inferior frontal, temporal, and parietal areas. In addition, the left middle frontal gyrus (LMFG), left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG), and left middle temporal gyrus (LMTG) showed activity that correlated with individual performance on the Related condition. The superior temporal gyrus (STG) showed increased activation in the Same condition suggesting that it is sensitive to perceptual similarity rather than the integration of meaning between the sentence pairs. A fronto-temporo-parietal network appears to consolidate information sources across multiple levels of language (acoustic, lexical, syntactic, semantic) to build, and ultimately integrate conceptual information across sentences and facilitate the perception of a degraded speech signal. However, the nature of the sources of information that are available differentially recruit specific regions and modulate their activity within this network. Implications of these findings for the functional architecture of the network are considered.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Conceptual meaning; Context effects; Degraded speech; Fronto-temporo-parietal network; Sentence integration

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27100909      PMCID: PMC4875831          DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.03.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  51 in total

1.  Real-time 3D image registration for functional MRI.

Authors:  R W Cox; A Jesmanowicz
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex.

Authors:  G A Calvert; R Campbell; M J Brammer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 3.  Corticothalamic feedback and sensory processing.

Authors:  Henry J Alitto; W Martin Usrey
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.627

4.  An event-related fMRI investigation of voice-onset time discrimination.

Authors:  Emmette R Hutchison; Sheila E Blumstein; Emily B Myers
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 5.  A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400.

Authors:  Ellen F Lau; Colin Phillips; David Poeppel
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 34.870

6.  Evidence for Cerebellar Contributions to Adaptive Plasticity in Speech Perception.

Authors:  Sara Guediche; Lori L Holt; Patryk Laurent; Sung-Joo Lim; Julie A Fiez
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  A generalized form of context-dependent psychophysiological interactions (gPPI): a comparison to standard approaches.

Authors:  Donald G McLaren; Michele L Ries; Guofan Xu; Sterling C Johnson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Lexical influences on speech perception: a Granger causality analysis of MEG and EEG source estimates.

Authors:  David W Gow; Jennifer A Segawa; Seppo P Ahlfors; Fa-Hsuan Lin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Functional integration across brain regions improves speech perception under adverse listening conditions.

Authors:  Jonas Obleser; Richard J S Wise; M Alex Dresner; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Speech motor brain regions are differentially recruited during perception of native and foreign-accented phonemes for first and second language listeners.

Authors:  Daniel Callan; Akiko Callan; Jeffery A Jones
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  5 in total

1.  Phonemic restoration in Alzheimer's disease and semantic dementia: a preliminary investigation.

Authors:  Jessica Jiang; Jeremy C S Johnson; Maï-Carmen Requena-Komuro; Elia Benhamou; Harri Sivasathiaseelan; Damion L Sheppard; Anna Volkmer; Sebastian J Crutch; Chris J D Hardy; Jason D Warren
Journal:  Brain Commun       Date:  2022-05-07

2.  Sublexical cues affect degraded speech processing: insights from fMRI.

Authors:  Arkan Al-Zubaidi; Susann Bräuer; Chris R Holdgraf; Inga M Schepers; Jochem W Rieger
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2022-02-16

3.  Effects of temporal order and intentionality on reflective attention to words in noise.

Authors:  T M Vanessa Chan; Bradley R Buchsbaum; Claude Alain
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-03-08

4.  Neural modelling of the semantic predictability gain under challenging listening conditions.

Authors:  Anna Uta Rysop; Lea-Maria Schmitt; Jonas Obleser; Gesa Hartwigsen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Processing of Degraded Speech in Brain Disorders.

Authors:  Jessica Jiang; Elia Benhamou; Sheena Waters; Jeremy C S Johnson; Anna Volkmer; Rimona S Weil; Charles R Marshall; Jason D Warren; Chris J D Hardy
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-03-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.