Literature DB >> 19515116

Inferior frontal regions underlie the perception of phonetic category invariance.

Emily B Myers1, Sheila E Blumstein, Edward Walsh, James Eliassen.   

Abstract

The problem of mapping differing sensory stimuli onto a common category is fundamental to human cognition. Listeners perceive stable phonetic categories despite many sources of acoustic variability. What are the neural mechanisms that underlie this perceptual stability? In this functional magnetic resonance imaging study, a short-interval habituation paradigm was used to investigate neural sensitivity to acoustic changes within and between phonetic categories. A region in the left inferior frontal sulcus showed a pattern of activation consistent with phonetic invariance: insensitivity to acoustic changes within a phonetic category and sensitivity to changes between phonetic categories. Left superior temporal regions, in contrast, showed graded sensitivity to both within- and between-category changes. These results suggest that perceptual insensitivity to changes within a phonetic category may arise from decision-related mechanisms in the left prefrontal cortex and add to a growing body of literature suggesting that the inferior prefrontal cortex plays a domain-general role in computing category representations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19515116      PMCID: PMC2851201          DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02380.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  36 in total

1.  Real-time 3D image registration for functional MRI.

Authors:  R W Cox; A Jesmanowicz
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Common prefrontal regions coactivate with dissociable posterior regions during controlled semantic and phonological tasks.

Authors:  Brian T Gold; Randy L Buckner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Selection, integration, and conflict monitoring; assessing the nature and generality of prefrontal cognitive control mechanisms.

Authors:  David Badre; Anthony D Wagner
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-02-05       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  A comparison of primate prefrontal and inferior temporal cortices during visual categorization.

Authors:  David J Freedman; Maximilian Riesenhuber; Tomaso Poggio; Earl K Miller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Hearing lips and seeing voices.

Authors:  H McGurk; J MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The perception of voice onset time: an fMRI investigation of phonetic category structure.

Authors:  Sheila E Blumstein; Emily B Myers; Jesse Rissman
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 7.  The mirror-neurons system: data and models.

Authors:  Laila Craighero; Giorgio Metta; Giulio Sandini; Luciano Fadiga
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.453

Review 8.  Perception of the speech code.

Authors:  A M Liberman; F S Cooper; D P Shankweiler; M Studdert-Kennedy
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 9.  The neuroanatomical and functional organization of speech perception.

Authors:  Sophie K Scott; Ingrid S Johnsrude
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 13.837

10.  Analysis of lesions by MRI in stroke patients with acoustic-phonetic processing deficits.

Authors:  D Caplan; D Gow; N Makris
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  50 in total

1.  New method for fMRI investigations of language: defining ROIs functionally in individual subjects.

Authors:  Evelina Fedorenko; Po-Jang Hsieh; Alfonso Nieto-Castañón; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Evaluating the sources and functions of gradiency in phoneme categorization: An individual differences approach.

Authors:  Efthymia C Kapnoula; Matthew B Winn; Eun Jong Kong; Jan Edwards; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  A review and synthesis of the first 20 years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading.

Authors:  Cathy J Price
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-05-12       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  What does the right hemisphere know about phoneme categories?

Authors:  Michael Wolmetz; David Poeppel; Brenda Rapp
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Functional Segregation of Cortical Regions Underlying Speech Timing and Articulation.

Authors:  Michael A Long; Kalman A Katlowitz; Mario A Svirsky; Rachel C Clary; Tara McAllister Byun; Najib Majaj; Hiroyuki Oya; Matthew A Howard; Jeremy D W Greenlee
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Effects of category learning on neural sensitivity to non-native phonetic categories.

Authors:  Emily B Myers; Kristen Swan
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Representations of Invariant Musical Categories Are Decodable by Pattern Analysis of Locally Distributed BOLD Responses in Superior Temporal and Intraparietal Sulci.

Authors:  Mike E Klein; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  The relationship between maternal education and the neural substrates of phoneme perception in children: Interactions between socioeconomic status and proficiency level.

Authors:  Lisa L Conant; Einat Liebenthal; Anjali Desai; Jeffrey R Binder
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Neural Systems Underlying Perceptual Adjustment to Non-Standard Speech Tokens.

Authors:  Emily B Myers; Laura M Mesite
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

10.  Specialization along the left superior temporal sulcus for auditory categorization.

Authors:  Einat Liebenthal; Rutvik Desai; Michael M Ellingson; Brinda Ramachandran; Anjali Desai; Jeffrey R Binder
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-04-09       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.